Which magnesium is the best? The forms in an honest comparison
There is no best magnesium. There is only the one that fits your goal. Here is the map that actually helps you in front of the shelf.
The question "which magnesium is the best" has no answer. It has four. And which of them is yours does not depend on the price, but on what your body currently needs from you.
You are standing in front of the shelf. Twelve tubs, all with the word magnesium on them. One costs 3.95 euros and promises 400 mg. One costs 29 euros and promises bisglycinate, high purity, chelated. And you are thinking what you think about everything on that shelf: is this science or is this marketing?
I understand that very well. I ask myself the same question with every study I read.
The short answer first: both are a little bit true. There are real, measurable differences between the magnesium forms. And there is a lot of label poetry that makes those differences look bigger than they are. The interesting part lies exactly in between.
What you will find here
- Why ranking thinking leads you astray
- The elemental content trap on the label
- Why your blood value says little about your status
- Glycinate and bisglycinate for nerves and sleep
- Citrate for the gut, for better and for worse
- Malate for energy, L-threonate for the brain
- Oxide: cheap, highly dosed, poorly absorbed
- The goal-to-form map from clinical practice
The question about the best magnesium is the wrong question
Imagine someone asks you: which footwear is the best? You would ask back. For what? A marathon, a day at the office, a winter hike, a wedding?
With magnesium we almost never take that step of asking back. We look for a ranking. First place, second place, third place. And the supplement industry delivers exactly that, because rankings sell better than differentiation.
The research is more sober about it. A systematic review from Spain screened 433 studies and analysed 14 of them that compared different magnesium forms directly. The result was less dramatic than the shelf suggests: inorganic compounds appear to be absorbed somewhat less well than organic ones. And the proportion your gut takes up depends strongly on the dose.
Two nutritional scientists from Hannover collected what we know about the absorption of magnesium in the gut. They describe two routes: a passive one that runs between the intestinal cells, and an active one via the transport channels TRPM6 and TRPM7.
Their conclusion is unusually honest for a field in which a lot is being sold. In essence: the type of magnesium salt appears to matter less than is often assumed. Some studies show slightly better availability of organic compounds, others do not. More important, they write, are the dose and your own starting status.
And one more detail that changes more in everyday life than any choice of form: relative absorption is higher when the same amount is spread across the day rather than taken all at once.
Schuchardt JP, Hahn A. Curr Nutr Food Sci. 2017. DOI: 10.2174/1573401313666170427162740You are not looking for the best form. You are looking for the form that fits your goal, your gut and your daily routine.
That sounds less spectacular. But it is the reason why two people with the same symptom may sensibly reach for two different doses.
And now you know why I am not giving you a ranking, but a map.
The elemental content trap: 1000 mg is not 1000 mg
Before we talk about forms, we have to talk about a number. It is on every tub, and it does not mean what most people think it means.
When the pack says "1000 mg magnesium bisglycinate", that is not 1000 mg of magnesium. It is 1000 mg of the whole compound. The magnesium ion is only a small part of it. The rest is the partner it is bound to.
This is not a question of studies, it is chemistry. You can calculate it. And the numbers are surprisingly far apart.
| Compound | Share of elemental magnesium (approx.) | What that means in practice |
|---|---|---|
| Magnesium oxide | around 60 percent | A lot of magnesium per capsule, but poorly absorbed |
| Magnesium citrate | around 16 percent | Large capsules needed, but highly soluble |
| Magnesium malate | around 15 percent | Similar to citrate, with malate as an added argument |
| Magnesium bisglycinate | around 14 percent | A lot of carrier substance, usually gentle on the stomach |
| Magnesium L-threonate | around 8 percent | Very low magnesium share per gram of powder |
A tub with 1000 mg of magnesium bisglycinate delivers roughly 140 mg of elemental magnesium. A tub with 1000 mg of magnesium oxide delivers, on paper, roughly 600 mg. Only your gut takes up a considerably smaller share of it.
This is where the real trick of many labels sits. The big number on the front advertises the compound. The small number in the nutrition table names the elemental magnesium. And only the second one counts.
Ignore the front. Turn the tub around and look for the line with the word elemental, or the nutrition table with the percentage of the reference value. That number is the only one comparable to what is dosed in studies.
A second look is worth it with "glycinate". Some products blend magnesium oxide with free glycine and call it something similar. A genuine chelate appears in the ingredient list as its own compound.
And now you know why a cheap product sometimes contains more magnesium than an expensive one without your body getting more of it.
Why your blood value can lull you into a false sense of security
You have been to the doctor. Serum magnesium: 0.84 mmol per litre. All within range. And still your eyelid has been twitching for three weeks.
I know this pattern very well. And I understand the confusion it creates.
The problem is not the doctor and not the laboratory. The problem is that with the serum value we hold a night watchman's lamp into a dark factory yard and conclude from it that the whole hall is lit.
A review by an American research group worked through exactly this question. More than 99 percent of the magnesium in the body sits inside cells and in bone. Less than one percent floats in the blood serum.
The body keeps this serum value within extremely tight limits. When the level threatens to drop, it draws magnesium from the bone depot. That makes sense, because heart rhythm and nerve excitability depend on it. For diagnostics it is inconvenient: the value can look normal while the reserves are already shrinking.
A second paper in Open Heart describes the same problem even more pointedly and speaks of a subclinical magnesium shortfall that goes unrecognised in many cases.
Workinger JL et al. Nutrients. 2018. DOI: 10.3390/nu10091202 · DiNicolantonio JJ et al. Open Heart. 2018. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000668What follows from that? Not that the serum value is useless. It is important for recognising a real, acute deficiency, and it is indispensable in kidney disease. It is simply not a fine early warning system.
This is where what studies show reliably parts ways with what is discussed clinically. Established is: serum reflects total body stores poorly. Discussed and not yet conclusively standardised are alternatives such as magnesium in whole blood, in the red blood cell, or the ionised fraction. These methods have weaknesses of their own, and so far there is no accepted gold standard.
"All normal" means, with magnesium: "unremarkable in the section we measured". It does not automatically mean "plentiful in your cells".
This is not a reproach aimed at laboratory medicine. It is a property of this mineral that the whole field is wrestling with.
And now you know why the question of form is sometimes only the second question. The first one is: what were you actually looking for?
The forms, sorted by function rather than by rank
Now to the map itself. I am not sorting by better and worse, but by what a form is intended for.
Glycinate and bisglycinate: the quiet variant
Here the magnesium is bound to the amino acid glycine, usually to two of them. Picture it as a mineral wrapped in a soft envelope. The envelope changes how the gut deals with it.
Two reasons make this form popular. First, it has a reputation for being particularly gentle on the stomach, because it irritates the gut less osmotically. Second, glycine itself is an inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system, which many people find a sensible combination for the evening.
How solid is that? Honestly: less solid than the price suggests. A cross-over study with 40 healthy adults found no significant rise in plasma magnesium in the first six hours after taking bisglycinate, while oxide and citrate rose in the short term. That can be read in two ways: as weaker absorption, or as a hint that plasma peaks are a poor yardstick for a compound that enters the cell differently. This study was co-funded by a manufacturer of a competing form, which belongs in the picture.
A Turkish research group compared in mice how much magnesium from different compounds actually arrives in muscle and brain, at three different doses.
They found that magnesium acetyl taurate raised brain magnesium at all doses, and that citrate raised muscle and brain independently of dose. One side finding was also interesting: splitting a high daily dose into two servings did not raise tissue levels sufficiently.
Important for context: this is an animal study. It shows biologically plausible differences between compounds. In humans this is not proven in the same way.
Ates M et al. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s12011-019-01663-0Citrate: the gut motor
Magnesium citrate dissolves well in water. That is exactly why it can do two things at once, and exactly why it is a blessing for some people and a problem for others.
It is the best studied organic form. In a randomised cross-over study with 20 healthy men, the citrate group excreted significantly more magnesium in the urine within 24 hours than the oxide group. More excretion sounds paradoxical, but it is precisely the proof: what was never absorbed cannot be excreted via the kidney either.
The flip side: citrate draws water into the bowel. If your digestive system is fast moving anyway, that can become uncomfortable. If it is sluggish, that same effect may be exactly what you want.
Malate: the energy association
Magnesium malate binds magnesium to malic acid. Malate is a genuine building block in the citric acid cycle, the circuit in which your mitochondria make energy available. That logic is seductive: magnesium plus an energy metabolism molecule.
What we know: in a rat study, magnesium malate had the highest area under the concentration curve of all compounds tested, so it stayed elevated in serum the longest. What we do not know: whether this advantage is relevant in humans, and whether it actually translates into more energy in daily life. That gap deserves to be named.
A research group in Izmir gave rats a single dose of 400 mg per 70 kg and measured over several hours how five magnesium compounds behaved in serum and in tissue.
Malate reached the highest area under the curve pharmacokinetically. Acetyl taurate was absorbed fastest, reached the highest concentration in the brain and went along with less anxious behaviour in the animals. Oxide and citrate performed weakest in this model.
That sits in tension with the human data, in which citrate performs well. Contradictions like these are exactly why I stay cautious with sentences such as "form X is superior".
Uysal N et al. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s12011-018-1351-9L-threonate: the brain hypothesis
Magnesium L-threonate is the newest and most expensive form. The idea behind it is specific: threonate is meant to be more than a transport vehicle, it is meant to contribute something itself.
In cell cultures with hippocampal neurons, threonate raised the magnesium concentration inside the nerve cell, increased the presence of a particular NMDA receptor subunit and raised the density of functional synapses. Other magnesium anions did not do that in the same experiment.
That is an intriguing mechanism. But it is cell culture and an animal model. In humans there is one randomised study with 109 healthy adults in China in which memory tests improved after 30 days. The catch: the preparation also contained phosphatidylserine as well as vitamin C and D. You cannot derive from it what the threonate alone did.
A group at Tsinghua University investigated why magnesium combined with L-threonate arrives in the brain differently from other magnesium salts.
They found threonate occurring naturally in cerebrospinal fluid and showed in cultured hippocampal neurons that threonate directly raised the magnesium concentration inside the cell. The route ran via glucose transporters.
Assessment: mechanistically plausible and cleanly done. For the question of whether you notice anything from it in daily life, it is not enough. Part of the work comes from the environment of the manufacturer.
Sun Q et al. Neuropharmacology. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.05.006Oxide: cheap, highly dosed, weakly absorbed
And now to the form that sits in most discount products.
Magnesium oxide is an inorganic compound with the highest magnesium share per gram. For manufacturers it is perfect: cheap, compact, a big number on the label. For absorption it is the weakest of the common options.
In a randomised double blind study over 60 days with 46 people, magnesium oxide did not differ from placebo in urinary magnesium excretion, while citrate and an amino acid chelate performed better. That is a sobering result for a product sold in the millions.
But now comes the part that the usual "oxide is rubbish" articles leave out. There is one situation in which precisely this poor absorption is the desired effect.
A Japanese research group randomised 90 people with chronic constipation over 28 days to senna, magnesium oxide or placebo.
The response rate was 11.7 percent on placebo, 69.2 percent on senna and 68.3 percent on magnesium oxide. Stool frequency and quality of life also improved clearly compared with placebo.
What that means for you: magnesium oxide is not a good route for topping up your magnesium reserves. As an osmotic agent for sluggish digestion, by contrast, it is well documented.
Morishita D et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021. DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000942Magnesium oxide is not worthless. It is just usually on the shelf for the wrong purpose.
And there are dissenting voices. A study with 61 young women found the strongest rise in ionised magnesium after ten days under oxide of all things. I am showing you this because a body of evidence that points in only one direction has usually been filtered.
It is not the form alone that decides, but the fit between form, goal and gut.
The goal-to-form map
Here is the overview I would have liked when I first started working on this topic. It does not replace medical advice or individual diagnostics. It only brings order to what otherwise sits jumbled on the shelf.
Glycinate / bisglycinate
Usually well tolerated, including in the evening. Glycine itself is an inhibitory messenger in the nervous system.
Downside: a lot of carrier substance, large capsules, higher price. The human data on absorption are thinner than the marketing.
Citrate
Highly soluble, the best studied organic form, draws water into the bowel.
Downside: that very effect can be disruptive with a sensitive gut or a tendency towards irritable bowel.
Malate
Malate is a building block in the energy metabolism of the cell. Longest serum course in the animal model.
Downside: human studies on an energy effect are largely missing. The logic is plausible, not proven.
L-threonate
Mechanistically the most specific form, with data on intracellular magnesium in nerve cells.
Downside: expensive, very low magnesium share, human data often from combination products.
Oxide
Very high magnesium share, inexpensive, well documented as an osmotic agent in constipation.
Downside: weak in several studies as a route for topping up stores.
Other forms
Taurate is discussed for the heart and nervous system, carbonate and sulfate rather for the gut.
Downside: for many of these forms there are almost only animal data, or no comparative studies at all.
It does not say which form is the strongest. It says which side effect you accept and which one you put to work for you.
And now you know why the same question from two people in my practice leads to two different recommendations.
Tolerability, cramps and one uncomfortable study
Now comes the part where I risk disappointing you. I am writing it anyway, because I do not want to offer you a text that only confirms what you would like to hear.
Magnesium for calf cramps is one of the oldest certainties in the family medicine cabinet. And of all things, the evidence for it is weak.
A Cochrane author team analysed eleven randomised studies with a total of 735 participants.
In older people with idiopathic, mostly nocturnal cramps they found no clinically meaningful advantage over placebo. The difference was 0.18 cramps per week, with a confidence interval that clearly includes zero. For pregnancy related cramps the data were inconsistent. Gastrointestinal side effects occurred in 11 to 37 percent depending on the study.
What that means for you: if you take magnesium for cramps and nothing happens, that is not down to you. It fits the evidence.
Garrison SR et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009402.pub3What I see, and what I must not derive from it
In consultations I regularly come across one pattern. People with tension and nocturnal calf cramps report that they "have been taking magnesium for a long time". When I ask further, it often turns out to be: highly dosed magnesium oxide, once daily, often with loose stools as an accompanying effect.
After a switch to bisglycinate, spread across two smaller servings, some of these people describe less tension and calmer nights over the following weeks. Others describe no change at all.
I cannot claim causality from this. There is no control group, no blinding, no way of ruling out placebo effects or spontaneous course. What I can say: the temporal association is documented in the records. That is all it is, and that is all it should be.
Where magnesium performs better than it does for cramps is at the circulatory level. A meta-analysis of 34 randomised double blind studies with 2,028 participants found, at a mean dose of 368 mg daily over roughly three months, a reduction in systolic blood pressure of 2.00 mmHg and in diastolic pressure of 1.78 mmHg. That is not a dramatic effect for the individual. At population level it is relevant.
And on the subject of sleep and restlessness? There too the picture is more honest than many guides present it.
A meta-analysis pooled three randomised studies with 151 older people. Time to fall asleep was on average roughly 17 minutes shorter on magnesium than on placebo. Total sleep time rose by 16 minutes, but that difference was not statistically secured.
The authors themselves rated the quality of the evidence as low to very low. A systematic review of 15 intervention studies and a further one of 18 studies on anxiety and tension arrived at a similar picture: mostly positive signals, consistently small studies, weak methodology.
What that means for you: magnesium may be a sensible building block, especially if your starting status is low. It replaces neither sleep hygiene nor the search for the cause.
Mah J, Pitre T. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021. DOI: 10.1186/s12906-021-03297-z · Rawji A et al. Cureus. 2024. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59317And now you know why with magnesium I speak of building blocks rather than of quick answers.
The four lenses: why magnesium plays a part everywhere at once
In clinical psychoneuroimmunology we look at a symptom through four lenses. Magnesium is a good example of why this is not an esoteric detour, but simply cell biology.
Nervous system
Magnesium sits like a doorman in the NMDA receptor channel and dampens the excitability of the nerve cell. If it is missing, the channel can open more easily. Reviews describe the link to migraine, pain processing and sensitivity to stimuli via exactly this route.
Metabolism
Every molecule of ATP, the energy currency of your cell, is bound to magnesium in the body. Without magnesium, ATP is barely usable biologically. That is why a low status often shows up first as diffuse exhaustion.
Hormonal system
Magnesium is involved in the regulation of the stress axis. Sustained stress increases excretion via the kidney. That can create a spiral: stress lowers magnesium, less magnesium raises excitability, excitability raises stress.
Immune system
Magnesium is a cofactor in enzymes involved in the regulation of inflammatory processes. A low status is linked in reviews with raised inflammatory markers. Cause and consequence are not yet cleanly separated here.
These four lenses explain why magnesium turns up in such different guides: for sleep, for migraine, for blood pressure, for exhaustion, for PMS. Not because it is a cure-all. But because a cofactor involved in many hundreds of enzyme reactions can also make itself felt in many places when it becomes scarce.
This is not about a twitching eyelid. It is about whether you can switch off in the evening. Whether your body really goes into repair mode at night. Whether you have the feeling in the morning that something has been recharged.
This is not a cosmetic topic. This is room to manoeuvre.
Three levers you can put into practice today
No protocol, no weekly plans, no brands. Just three things that lie in your hands.
Lever 1: recalculate your label
- Take your current tub. Look for the line with the elemental magnesium, or the percentage of the reference value.
- Compare that number with what you believed you had been taking. For many people it is a small surprise.
- If it lists magnesium oxide only and your goal is not digestion, that is a good reason for a conversation in the practice.
Lever 2: spread rather than stack
- The review from Hannover is very clear on this point: relative absorption is higher when the same amount is spread across the day.
- The gut has limited transport capacity. A large single dose overwhelms it and ends up in the stool.
- If your goal is calm in the evening, you can shift the emphasis later in the day. If it is digestion, rather earlier.
Lever 3: define your goal before you buy
- Write down in one sentence what should change. Sleep? Tension? Digestion? Concentration?
- Only then look at the map further up. This order saves money and disappointment.
- If symptoms remain, magnesium is rarely the whole story. Then it is worth looking at the thyroid, iron status, vitamin D, sleep architecture and stress load.
With impaired kidney function, magnesium can accumulate in the body. That can become dangerous. Magnesium can also interfere with the absorption of certain antibiotics and of thyroid hormones, which is why spacing them apart in time makes sense.
Higher doses and the choice of form therefore belong under medical supervision, particularly with existing conditions, in pregnancy and with long term medication.
And now you know why the most honest answer to "which magnesium is the best" begins with a question in return.
Common questions about the magnesium forms
Which magnesium is the best?
There is no best magnesium, there is only the one that fits your goal.
For the nervous system and sleep many people reach for glycinate or bisglycinate, because it has a reputation for being particularly gentle on the stomach and because glycine itself has calming properties in the nervous system. Citrate can get the bowel moving and is therefore interesting for people who tend towards constipation. Malate is often used for exhaustion, because malate is a building block in the energy metabolism of the cell. L-threonate is discussed for cognitive questions.
Reviews on absorption reach a sober conclusion: dose and starting status are often more important than the compound. The form mainly decides tolerability and side effects.
Is magnesium oxide really bad?
Bad is too blunt a word. Used for the wrong purpose fits better.
Magnesium oxide is cheap, has the highest magnesium share per gram and is less well absorbed than organic compounds in several human studies. In a study over 60 days, oxide did not differ from placebo in urinary magnesium excretion, while citrate and an amino acid chelate performed better.
At the same time, magnesium oxide is well documented as an osmotic agent in chronic constipation. In a randomised study with 90 people the response rate was 68.3 percent compared with 11.7 percent on placebo.
There are dissenting voices too: a study with 61 young women found the strongest rise in ionised magnesium after ten days under oxide. So the evidence is not as clear cut as many articles claim.
What is the difference between magnesium glycinate and bisglycinate?
In practical terms both words almost always mean the same product.
Bisglycinate describes more precisely, in chemical terms, that one magnesium ion is enclosed by two glycine molecules, as if by two arms. Glycinate is used as the short form.
More important than the name is the question of whether you have a genuine chelate or a blend of magnesium oxide and free glycine that sounds similar on the label. A look at the ingredient list brings clarity: does it list magnesium bisglycinate as its own compound, or are magnesium oxide and glycine listed separately?
Why does the tub say 1000 mg magnesium and yet there is little in it?
Because two completely different numbers carry the same word.
1000 mg of magnesium bisglycinate is not 1000 mg of magnesium, it is roughly 140 mg of elemental magnesium. The rest is glycine. For magnesium citrate the share is around 16 percent, for magnesium malate around 15 percent, for magnesium L-threonate around 8 percent and for magnesium oxide around 60 percent.
What counts is always the line with the word elemental, or the nutrition table with the percentage of the reference value. Everything else is packaging weight.
Which magnesium for sleep problems and inner restlessness?
In practice glycinate or bisglycinate is usually chosen here, because it is well tolerated in the evening and leaves the bowel in peace at night.
The evidence, honestly, is thin. A meta-analysis of three small studies with 151 older people found time to fall asleep around 17 minutes shorter, but rated the quality of the evidence itself as low to very low. A systematic review of 15 intervention studies found mostly positive but methodologically weak signals.
So magnesium may be a sensible building block, especially with a low starting status. It replaces neither sleep hygiene nor the search for the cause.
Which magnesium for constipation, which one for a sensitive gut?
With sluggish digestion you can use exactly what many people fear as a side effect.
Citrate and oxide draw water into the bowel and can soften the stool. For magnesium oxide there is a randomised study on this with a clear advantage over placebo.
With a sensitive gut or a tendency towards irritable bowel, the opposite direction makes more sense: rather glycinate or malate, spread across smaller single doses through the day. The reason is the same as above, only with the sign reversed.
Can magnesium help with calf cramps?
Here I have to be honest, even if it is uncomfortable.
A Cochrane review of eleven randomised studies with 735 participants found no clinically meaningful advantage over placebo in older people with nocturnal cramps. The difference was 0.18 cramps per week. For pregnancy related cramps the data are inconsistent, and the authors see a need for further research there.
Clinically I still see people in whom something changes after a switch of form or of distribution. I cannot derive causality from that. I am describing an observation, not a proven effect.
Why does my blood value say my magnesium is fine?
Because the standard value shows only a tiny section.
More than 99 percent of the magnesium in the body sits in cells and in bone. Less than one percent floats in the serum. The body keeps this serum value within very tight limits, if necessary by drawing magnesium from the bone depot.
A normal serum value therefore does not reliably rule out a shortfall in the tissue. Specialist reviews have described this gap for years as one of the biggest problems in magnesium diagnostics. Alternatives such as whole blood, red cell magnesium or the ionised fraction are discussed, but an accepted gold standard is still missing.
When should I take magnesium, in the morning or in the evening?
There is no universal time of day, but there is one well documented rule.
Relative absorption is higher when the same amount is spread across the day rather than taken all at once. The gut has limited transport capacity, and a large single dose overwhelms it.
If you take magnesium because of evening restlessness, it makes sense to put the emphasis on the evening. If you take it for digestion, often rather on the morning. Discuss the specific distribution with the doctor who knows your values and your medication.
Can you overdose on magnesium?
With healthy kidneys the risk is low, because surplus magnesium is excreted.
The body cannot store magnesium the way it stores fat. It keeps only what it currently needs, the rest goes out via the kidney. The first signal of too much is usually loose stools.
It looks different with impaired kidney function. Here magnesium can accumulate and become dangerous. Interactions with certain antibiotics and with thyroid hormones also need to be kept in mind, which is why spacing them apart in time makes sense. Higher doses belong under medical supervision.
How this topic connects with the others
Magnesium rarely stands alone. If you have the feeling that one building block is not enough, these paths lead further.
Supplements
The guide this article belongs to
You are hereMagnesium and sleep
Which form, which dose, which evidence
Guide Sleep
When magnesium alone is not enough
Guide Gut
Why absorption is decided in the gut
Guide Burnout
Stress raises magnesium excretion
Guide Iron
The second frequently overlooked shortfall
Guide Hormones
Stress axis, cycle and minerals
Sleep hygiene
The frame no supplement replaces
Sources
- Schuchardt JP, Hahn A. Intestinal Absorption and Factors Influencing Bioavailability of Magnesium, An Update. Curr Nutr Food Sci. 2017;13(4):260-278. DOI: 10.2174/1573401313666170427162740 [Review]
- Pardo MR, Garicano Vilar E, San Mauro Martín I, Camina Martín MA. Bioavailability of magnesium food supplements: A systematic review. Nutrition. 2021;89:111294. DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2021.111294 [Systematic review, k=14]
- Kappeler D, Heimbeck I, Herpich C et al. Higher bioavailability of magnesium citrate as compared to magnesium oxide shown by evaluation of urinary excretion and serum levels after single-dose administration in a randomized cross-over study. BMC Nutr. 2017;3:7. DOI: 10.1186/s40795-016-0121-3 [RCT, crossover, n=20]
- Walker AF, Marakis G, Christie S, Byng M. Mg citrate found more bioavailable than other Mg preparations in a randomised, double-blind study. Magnes Res. 2003;16(3):183-191. PMID: 14596323 [RCT, n=46, 60 days]
- Pajuelo D, Meissner JM, Negra T, Connolly A, Mullor JL. Comparative Clinical Study on Magnesium Absorption and Side Effects After Oral Intake of Microencapsulated Magnesium Versus Other Magnesium Sources. Nutrients. 2024;16(24):4367. DOI: 10.3390/nu16244367 [RCT, crossover, n=40, manufacturer funded]
- Ivanovic ND, Radosavljevic B, Zekovic M et al. Effects of short-term magnesium supplementation on ionized, total magnesium and other relevant electrolytes levels. Biometals. 2022;35(2):267-283. DOI: 10.1007/s10534-022-00363-y [Intervention study, n=61]
- Uysal N, Kizildag S, Yuce Z et al. Timeline (Bioavailability) of Magnesium Compounds in Hours: Which Magnesium Compound Works Best? Biol Trace Elem Res. 2018;187(1):128-136. DOI: 10.1007/s12011-018-1351-9 [In vivo, rat]
- Ates M, Kizildag S, Yuksel O et al. Dose-Dependent Absorption Profile of Different Magnesium Compounds. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2019;192(2):244-251. DOI: 10.1007/s12011-019-01663-0 [In vivo, mouse]
- Workinger JL, Doyle RP, Bortz J. Challenges in the Diagnosis of Magnesium Status. Nutrients. 2018;10(9):1202. DOI: 10.3390/nu10091202 [Review]
- DiNicolantonio JJ, O'Keefe JH, Wilson W. Subclinical magnesium deficiency: a principal driver of cardiovascular disease and a public health crisis. Open Heart. 2018;5(1):e000668. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000668 [Review]
- Mah J, Pitre T. Oral magnesium supplementation for insomnia in older adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021;21(1):125. DOI: 10.1186/s12906-021-03297-z [Meta-analysis, k=3, n=151]
- Rawji A, Peltier MR, Mourtzanakis K et al. Examining the Effects of Supplemental Magnesium on Self-Reported Anxiety and Sleep Quality: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2024;16(4):e59317. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59317 [Systematic review, k=15]
- Boyle NB, Lawton C, Dye L. The Effects of Magnesium Supplementation on Subjective Anxiety and Stress, A Systematic Review. Nutrients. 2017;9(5):429. DOI: 10.3390/nu9050429 [Systematic review, k=18]
- Kirkland AE, Sarlo GL, Holton KF. The Role of Magnesium in Neurological Disorders. Nutrients. 2018;10(6):730. DOI: 10.3390/nu10060730 [Review]
- Garrison SR, Korownyk CS, Kolber MR et al. Magnesium for skeletal muscle cramps. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;9(9):CD009402. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009402.pub3 [Meta-analysis, k=11, n=735]
- Morishita D, Tomita T, Mori S et al. Senna Versus Magnesium Oxide for the Treatment of Chronic Constipation: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116(1):152-161. DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000942 [RCT, n=90]
- Zhang C, Hu Q, Li S et al. A Magtein, Magnesium L-Threonate, Based Formula Improves Brain Cognitive Functions in Healthy Chinese Adults. Nutrients. 2022;14(24):5235. DOI: 10.3390/nu14245235 [RCT, n=109, combination product]
- Sun Q, Weinger JG, Mao F, Liu G. Regulation of structural and functional synapse density by L-threonate through modulation of intraneuronal magnesium concentration. Neuropharmacology. 2016;108:426-439. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.05.006 [In vitro, human and animal neurons]
- Zhang X, Li Y, Del Gobbo LC et al. Effects of Magnesium Supplementation on Blood Pressure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trials. Hypertension. 2016;68(2):324-333. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07664 [Meta-analysis, k=34, n=2,028]