Water Filters for Tap Water: When a Filter Makes Sense and What Each Technology Removes
Drinking water in Germany is strictly monitored. A filter can still make sense, for example with local PFAS contamination or with problems in a building's plumbing. With old lead pipes, replacement is what counts, not a filter. And a forgotten filter can itself become a source of germs.
I don't want to make you afraid of your tap. But I also don't want to promise you safety from a filter jug, because that kind of safety doesn't exist. A filter is a tool for a specific problem. Without a problem and without care, it can do more harm than good.
Maybe this very jug is standing in your kitchen. Maybe you bought it because filtered water simply feels safer.
That feeling is understandable. This is about something you drink every day, often by the litre. You don't want to take any risks with it. And when it comes to detox, the question of water almost always ends up on the table at some point.
In this article, we will sort through it together. How good is your tap water? What do the PFAS limits that have applied since 2026 regulate? When can a filter make sense, and when is replacing a pipe the better route? Which technology holds back what? And when does the filter itself become the problem?
How to read the study boxes
- Meta-analysis Statistical summary of several studies in humans
- Humans and everyday life Measurements in people, in households and in water supplies, as well as reviews of such data
- Lab Filter tests and operating trials under controlled conditions
I link legal texts and information from authorities such as the German Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt, UBA), the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) directly in the text.
Does a water filter make sense? The short answer
In short: For water from the public supply, a filter is usually not necessary from a health perspective. But there are clear exceptions.
Have you ever wondered how many checks your glass of water has been through before it comes out of the tap?
Germany's Federal Ministry of Health and the German Environment Agency regularly evaluate the data from the federal states. The current drinking water report covers the years 2020 to 2022. It looks at the large supply zones that deliver more than 1,000 cubic metres per day or supply more than 5,000 people. There, for most microbiological and chemical parameters, more than 99 percent of samples met the requirements of the Drinking Water Ordinance (Trinkwasserverordnung, TrinkwV), Germany's legally binding regulation on drinking water quality.
The Drinking Water Ordinance requires its standards to be met at the point where the water comes out of the tap inside the building. The pipes inside the building are the owners' responsibility. What happens after that in your filter jug is in your hands.
Imagine the waterworks as a strictly inspected commercial kitchen. Whether the food reaches you in good shape also depends on the tray it is carried on for the last few metres. With drinking water, that tray is the plumbing in your building.
If water stands in the pipes for a long time, it can take up substances from pipes and fittings. That is why the German Environment Agency advises against using the first water after a long standing time for drinking or cooking. Let it run until it comes out of the tap cool. How much you should drink at all is a separate question. You can read more about it in the article on kidneys and water.
When a filter can make sense and when it can't
Usually no filter needed
- You get your water from the public supply, and your supplier's values are unremarkable.
- The pipes in your building were laid after 1973 or have since been renewed.
- You would simply like to feel better about it, without a specific reason.
A filter can make sense
- Your supplier reports PFAS levels above the limit value, or the local health authority (Gesundheitsamt) has authorised a temporary deviation from it.
- A test of your water shows a specific problem that a device has been tested for.
- You use your own well and have had your water tested.
- Taste or limescale bother you. That is a question of comfort, not of health.
Clarify or replace instead of filtering
- There are signs of lead pipes. Then the answer is replacement, not filtering.
- Values are unclear or contradictory: have the water tested by an approved laboratory and ask the health authority.
- Pregnant women, infants or young children and suspected lead: bottled water that is suitable for preparing infant food.
The question is rarely whether our tap water is good. Usually it is: what happens over the last few metres to my glass? For that question, you need information first, not a device.
And now you know why a filter only makes sense once you know what it is supposed to protect you from.
What do the PFAS limits in force since 2026 mean?
In short: Since 12 January 2026, a joint limit value has applied to 20 PFAS. From 12 January 2028, a stricter value for four PFAS will be added.
Forever chemicals. The word alone sounds like a problem that will never go away. Maybe you read it in a headline and wondered whether it is in your glass too.
PFAS stands for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. The term covers thousands of industrially manufactured chemicals. Their carbon chains are fully or partly bonded to fluorine, and this bond is extremely stable. That is why PFAS are found in non-stick coatings, outdoor clothing, firefighting foam and packaging. And that is why they barely break down in the environment.
Imagine a chain wrapped all round in a suit of armour made of fluorine. Light, water and bacteria can hardly find a spot where they can get a grip.
The deadlines at a glance
Lead pipes are still being installed in parts of Germany, but nowhere after that. Southern Germany was practically always free of them.
The limit value for lead drops to 0.010 milligrams per litre.
The new Drinking Water Ordinance comes into force.
A limit value of 0.1 micrograms per litre applies to the Sum of PFAS-20. Lead pipes must be removed or decommissioned.
In addition, a limit value of 0.02 micrograms per litre applies to the Sum of PFAS-4. The limit value for lead drops to 0.005 milligrams per litre.
What lies behind the two sums? The Sum of PFAS-20 covers 20 PFAS with carbon chains of different lengths, including short-chain ones. With it, Germany implements the EU Drinking Water Directive, which sets 0.10 micrograms per litre for these 20 substances. The Sum of PFAS-4 covers only PFOA, PFNA, PFHxS and PFOS. Individual values below the limit of quantification are not counted in either sum. From 2028, both limit values must be met at the same time.
How small are these amounts? 0.02 micrograms are 20 nanograms, in other words 20 billionths of a gram per litre. That roughly corresponds to a sugar cube of about three grams spread across around 60 Olympic swimming pools.
Why do lawmakers regulate such tiny amounts? Because some PFAS stay in the body for years. For PFOA, follow-up studies from Germany show that blood levels fall only slowly after an exposure has ended.
Why these four substances in particular?
In 2020, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) set a tolerable weekly intake for exactly these four PFAS: 4.4 nanograms per kilogram of body weight per week. It considered effects on the immune system to be the most sensitive endpoint. The German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment estimates that the average intake in Germany is in the range of this value. For about half of adults, it is above it.
According to the BfR, PFAS are taken up largely through food and drinking water. In the EFSA assessment, fish, fruit and eggs made the largest contribution among foods. So a water filter can only influence the share that comes from the tap.
A team led by Grandjean followed children in the Faroe Islands from birth and measured PFAS as well as antibodies against tetanus and diphtheria after routine vaccinations. In an overall model, a doubling of the concentration of the main PFAS in the children's blood was associated with 49 percent fewer vaccine antibodies. For you, this means: PFAS are also an immune topic, and that is exactly where EFSA bases its guidance value.
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.2034In its German Environmental Survey (GerES) from 2014 to 2017, the German Environment Agency tested the blood plasma of 1,109 children and adolescents aged 3 to 17 for PFAS. PFOS was found in all samples and PFOA in almost all, with geometric means of 2.49 and 1.12 nanograms per millilitre. For you, this means: in Germany, PFAS are a background exposure that affects practically everyone, not just people in known problem areas.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113549What has already happened in Germany
Local contamination happens in Germany too. In 2006, PFOA was found in the drinking water of Arnsberg in the Sauerland region, at 500 to 640 nanograms per litre. For comparison: today's limit value for the Sum of PFAS-20 is 100 nanograms per litre. Around 40,000 people were affected, and their PFOA blood levels were 4.5 to 8.3 times higher than those of comparison groups. In July 2006, activated carbon filtration at the waterworks lowered the levels in the water, mostly to below the limit of detection. In the blood, they then fell by only about 10 to 20 percent per year.
A team from the Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority re-examined 764 people in the district of Altötting whose drinking water had previously been contaminated with PFOA from the fluoropolymer production of an industrial site. After the drinking water was purified, the average PFOA level in the blood fell by 56.9 percent between 2018 and 2022, and by 73.4 percent in children under twelve. For you, this means: where the source is tackled at the waterworks, the burden in the body can fall, but it takes years.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2024.114387And what if your supplier is above the limit value? Then it must inform the health authority and investigate the cause. The health authority can authorise a temporary deviation if no harm to health is to be expected. To do so, it sets an action value (Maßnahmenwert), the maximum level permitted during this period, and a deadline that may not exceed three years. If the deviation is not expected to be remedied within 30 days, the affected households must be informed and particularly vulnerable groups must be advised.
A limit value is not a switch between toxic and harmless. A value just above it is a task for the waterworks and the health authority, not a reason to panic. A value just below it is no reason to lose sight of how things develop.
What does that mean for you? Check your supplier's website for the PFAS values. If the limit value is exceeded or a deviation has been authorised, follow the health authority's advice first. Only after that does the question of a filter arise. You can read further below which technology may be suitable for this.
And now you know why a PFAS value in the water is first a task for the waterworks and only then a question for your kitchen.
Lead pipes at home: why is replacement what counts, not a filter?
In short: Lead pipes have been banned since 12 January 2026. Where they are still in place, the German Environment Agency calls for replacement, not a filter.
An old building, high ceilings, creaking floorboards. And somewhere behind the wall, a pipe that may be older than your grandparents.
According to the German Environment Agency, lead pipes were laid in parts of Germany until 1973, either as the service connection to the building or as pipes inside it. Southern Germany was practically always free of them. Elsewhere, too, far from all older buildings were affected, and most lead pipes have since been replaced. Where water still flows through lead, it usually does not meet the limit value. In water that has been standing in the pipes, the limit is often exceeded many times over.
Why is this so serious? Lead can cause harm even in very small amounts. It accumulates in the body and can impair above all the development of the nervous system and the formation of blood. Unborn babies, infants and toddlers are particularly at risk. In adults, some of the lead is stored in the bones. In phases of increased metabolism, such as pregnancy, it can return to the blood.
An international team led by Lanphear analysed seven long-term studies with 1,333 children who were followed from birth or early childhood to the age of five to ten. According to a correction published in 2019, an increase in blood lead from 2.4 to 10 micrograms per decilitre was associated with 3.8 fewer IQ points, and the loss per increase was particularly large in the low range. For you, this means: even small amounts of lead count, which is why it is worth closing every avoidable source.
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7688 · Correction: 10.1289/EHP5685The US city of Flint shows how quickly water can become a source of lead. It switched to a more corrosive water source without adequate corrosion control for its old pipe network. Afterwards, the proportion of children under five with elevated blood lead rose from 2.4 to 4.9 percent, as a team led by Hanna-Attisha showed.
What the Ordinance has required since January 2026
The Drinking Water Ordinance required the operators of a building's water system, usually the owners, to remove or decommission lead pipes by the end of 12 January 2026. Residents must be informed without delay if lead pipes are present or suspected. Since 13 January 2026, they must also be told in writing that the obligation has been met or that the deadline has been extended. The health authority can only grant an extension in narrowly defined cases. Owners who fail to act commit an administrative offence, and the health authority can order the replacement.
And a filter as a stopgap?
In the USA, certified filters are often handed out when there are lead problems, as a bridge until the pipes are replaced. What do they achieve?
A team from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reviewed 23 studies on filters certified for lead under the US standard NSF/ANSI 53, including tap-mounted, under-sink and jug filters. In field studies, 99 percent of these filters reached the target value, 1,512 of 1,528, while in the lab, under conditions that were partly harsher than those used for certification, only 61 percent did. For you, this means: a certified filter can clearly lower lead in everyday use, provided it is operated and maintained correctly.
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.120425Where filters failed, the review attributed this, among other things, to very high lead levels, to the shape and size of the lead particles, and to incorrect operation and lack of maintenance.
Both fit together. A certified filter can hold back lead in tests. But it leaves the source in the wall, needs maintenance and brings its own hygiene problem. And in Germany, replacement is mandatory anyway.
How to recognise lead pipes
Tips from the German Environment Agency
- Year of construction: Lead pipes are only still found in older buildings constructed before 1973.
- Colour: Unpainted, they are bluish grey to silvery grey.
- Softness: Lead is so soft that it is easy to scratch with a knife or a pointed object.
- Sound: When you tap it, lead sounds dull.
- Routing: Lead pipes were often laid in wide curves, not in tight right angles.
- Where to look: Visible pipes in the basement, before and after the water meter. For pipes concealed in the walls, a plumber can help.
If you rent, ask your landlord first. The property management may also know the year of construction and the material. If the answer is unsatisfactory, your local health authority is the next port of call. If the situation remains unclear, a water test can bring clarity. You will have to pay for it, and the water should have stood in the pipes for at least four hours beforehand.
According to the German Environment Agency, water from lead pipes is generally unsuitable for drinking and preparing food for pregnant women, infants and children up to six years of age. In that case, use bottled water labelled “suitable for the preparation of infant food” (in German: “Geeignet für die Zubereitung von Säuglingsnahrung”). For washing and showering, there are no health concerns related to the lead content.
I describe what lead can do in the body and how it is measured in the article on lead poisoning, its sources and symptoms.
With lead, a filter is at most a plaster on an open pipe. Replacement removes the source. That is why there is a clear order here: first clarify, then replace.
And now you know why, if you suspect lead, your first step is a call to your landlord, not the purchase of a filter.
Which filter technology holds back what?
In short: Jug filters, activated carbon blocks and reverse osmosis do very different things. No device holds back everything, and each one needs care.
In the shop, they stand side by side: the jug, the attachment for the tap, the system that goes under the sink. They all promise pure water. But pure of what?
Two principles lie behind most devices. The first is activated carbon. Imagine it as a sponge with a huge inner surface. Just one gram can have several hundred square metres of internal surface area to which substances stick.
The second is a membrane. In reverse osmosis, water is forced under pressure through an extremely fine layer. Most dissolved substances stay behind, including the minerals.
Jug filter
usually granular activated carbon plus ion exchanger
CanImprove taste and smell and reduce limescale. For PFAS, it depends heavily on the model.
LimitsHolds back short-chain PFAS less well. Does not remove germs, and they can even multiply inside the filter.
CareChange the cartridge as the manufacturer specifies, clean the jug, drink the water promptly.
Activated carbon block
as a tap attachment or under the sink
CanHold back many organic substances, and in real-world use 21 to 99 percent of PFAS, depending on the substance. With the appropriate certification, lead as well.
LimitsWeaker with short-chain PFAS. Without maintenance, germs and bound substances can get back into the water.
CareReplace on schedule, not by feel.
Reverse osmosis
membrane system, usually under the sink
CanHold back PFAS almost entirely in a large field study, regardless of chain length, plus many other dissolved substances.
LimitsAlso removes calcium and magnesium. Part of the water goes down the drain unused. More expensive to buy and maintain.
CarePre-filter, membrane and, if present, the storage tank need regular maintenance.
Ultrafiltration and UV
membranes with very fine pores, or UV light
CanMainly hold back bacteria and other microorganisms or render them harmless.
LimitsAs a rule, they do not hold back dissolved substances such as PFAS or dissolved lead.
CareLamps and membranes have a limited lifespan.
A team from Iwate Prefecture in Japan tested four jug filters on six PFAS, including PFOS and PFOA. The best model held back more than 90 percent over the entire recommended cartridge lifetime, while the weakest dropped below 50 percent towards the end, and in all models performance decreased the shorter the carbon chain. For you, this means: not all jug filters are the same, and performance can drop noticeably shortly before the cartridge is due to be changed.
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-11757-1In real-world use, a team from the Chinese Academy of Sciences measured removal rates of 21 to 99 percent for 14 PFAS in household filters with activated carbon made from coconut shells. How well a substance stuck depended mainly on how water-repellent it is.
A team from Hangzhou analysed tap water from three large bodies of water in East China, a region with a strong PFAS industry, for 81 PFAS and found 64 of them. Household reverse osmosis devices held back most PFAS almost entirely, regardless of chain length and of the initial level of contamination. For you, this means: if PFAS actually are a problem in your water, reverse osmosis is among the most effective household technologies.
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5c03293A team from the University of Genoa compiled what is known about household devices using activated carbon, ion exchange and reverse osmosis against PFAS. Many devices have been tested in the lab, but only five studies assessed their performance in real everyday use, and not all filters were convincing, especially with short-chain PFAS. For you, this means: a lab test mark says little about what your filter achieves after months in the kitchen.
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176764So look for independent testing for exactly the substance you are concerned about. And plan for maintenance from the start. It is as much a part of the device as the filter itself.
The best filter technology is the one that matches your problem and that you maintain reliably. An elaborate device without maintenance can deliver worse water than the tap without a filter.
And now you know why the most important question when buying a filter is not which one is best, but what exactly it is supposed to protect you from.
When does the filter itself become the problem?
In short: Activated carbon not only traps substances, it also offers bacteria a habitat. A forgotten filter can release more germs than were in the tap water.
Back to the jug on the worktop. The cartridge from the spring is still filtering, and the water tastes the same as always. What is happening inside it?
Tap water is not sterile, and it doesn't need to be. It contains a few, mostly harmless bacteria. In the activated carbon, they find a huge surface and nutrients that the carbon itself has fished out of the water. Room temperature and long standing times can make life even easier for them.
A team led by Daschner from environmental medicine in Freiburg tested a commercially available jug filter system in households and in two laboratories. In 24 of 34 filters from households, the germ count in the filtered water rose, in the lab even at 4 °C, and in individual cases it reached 10,000 times the level in the tap water. For you, this means: even a jug kept in the fridge is no reliable protection against germs in the filter.
DOI: 10.1007/BF01591360In the household filters, levels reached up to 6,000 colony-forming units per millilitre. Even the material of 5 of the 13 new filters examined was already contaminated with bacteria or moulds. The study is old, and filters have changed since then. But more recent work shows a similar pattern.
A team from Zhejiang University used genetic analyses to examine six different household devices with activated carbon after 80 days of operation. The filtered water had a greater diversity of bacteria than the tap water, and 29 to 79 percent of the microbes in it came from the biofilm on the carbon, as did some of the antibiotic resistance genes found. For you, this means: over time, the filter itself can become a source of bacteria.
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106394A field study by the University of North Carolina in 17 households with their own wells found another pattern. When little water flowed through the activated carbon filter overall, the odds of finding coliform bacteria in the filtered water were more than 50 times higher.
And what about the silver that is added to some filters? In a 1981 lab study, silver-containing activated carbon did slow down coliform germs, but not the growth of the other bacteria.
There is a similar pattern with chemicals. A full sponge absorbs nothing more, and if you squeeze it, it gives back what it has taken in. The researchers from Genoa point out that poorly maintained activated carbon could even increase PFAS levels in the filtered water.
This very hygiene problem is also the reason why the German Environment Agency advises against filters for lead pipes.
If you filter: how to keep the filter your tool
- Change the cartridge at the latest after the time or number of litres the manufacturer specifies, whichever comes first.
- Clean the jug and lid regularly.
- Drink filtered water promptly and don't leave it standing for days.
- After longer breaks, such as a holiday, it is better to put in a new cartridge.
- If you hardly use the filter, doing without it can be the better choice.
- If your immune system is weakened, during pregnancy and for infants, talk to your doctor or midwife first.
Taste is not a measuring device. The clearest, coolest water from the jug can contain more bacteria than the tap water it was filtered from.
And now you know why the cartridge from the spring is no longer a safety bonus but an open question.
Reverse osmosis and minerals: is purer automatically better?
In short: Reverse osmosis can hold back PFAS almost entirely. But it also strips the water of calcium and magnesium.
Pure water. That sounds like the ultimate ideal. But do you want water in which practically nothing is dissolved any more?
Calcium and magnesium, which make water hard, are dietary minerals. Most of them usually come from food. But hard water can make a contribution. Your supplier can tell you how much of them your water contains: it must publish hardness, calcium, magnesium and potassium online.
A team from Guangzhou pooled ten observational studies with 77,821 cases of coronary heart disease, nine of them from Europe. More magnesium in drinking water was associated with slightly lower mortality from coronary heart disease, with a relative risk of 0.89. For you, this means: minerals in water are not a nuisance, they might even make a small contribution to heart health, but this has not been proven.
DOI: 10.3390/nu8010005An observational study from Chongqing with almost 30,000 schoolchildren found smaller gains in height and more tooth decay at schools with low-mineral water from reverse osmosis systems. Such ecological studies cannot reliably rule out confounding factors. They are a hint, not proof.
Then there are practical points. Depending on the device, part of the water flows unused into the drain as concentrate. And pre-filter, membrane and, if present, storage tank need regular care, otherwise the same hygiene questions arise as with the jug.
Purer is not automatically healthier. Water carries not only substances you want to avoid, but also minerals your body needs.
If reverse osmosis makes sense for you, for example with proven PFAS contamination, pay all the more attention to a mineral-rich diet with vegetables, pulses, nuts and whole grains.
And now you know why the purest technology is not automatically the best choice for your everyday life.
Microplastics in tap water: how much is there?
In short: Measurements found only very few microplastic particles in tap water from well-treated groundwater. But these methods do not capture the smallest particles.
Plastic in the blood, plastic in the brain. After headlines like these, you may look at your tap differently.
A team from the Alfred Wegener Institute examined groundwater and drinking water at various points of a drinking water supply in Germany for plastic particles larger than 20 micrometres. They found 0 to 7 particles per cubic metre, 0.7 on average, in other words less than one particle in 1,000 litres, and the researchers named abrasion from plastic parts during treatment and transport as the likely source. For you, this means: tap water from groundwater can be a very small source of microplastics.
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.178A team from Aalborg University recorded particles from 6.6 micrometres upwards in drinking water networks. It estimated the possible intake via tap water at less than one particle per person per year, provided the water comes from an efficient waterworks.
A paper from Wageningen, in which the World Health Organization was involved, shows how cautiously such figures need to be read. The team assessed 50 studies on microplastics in freshwater and drinking water. The measured amounts differed by ten orders of magnitude, and only four studies met all quality criteria. On top of that, the measurements mentioned only capture particles above a certain size. They say nothing about even smaller particles.
I describe how bottled water compares and which everyday sources carry more weight in the article on microplastics in the body. I have not found any robust study on whether a household filter further lowers the already small amount in German tap water.
When it comes to microplastics, your tap water is, as things stand today, more of a small item. A filter for it has barely been studied and is not the first lever.
And now you know why, for German tap water, microplastics alone are not a strong argument for a filter.
How do you check your water and your pipes? Three steps
In short: Two pieces of information answer most questions: your water supplier's values and the age of your pipes.
You don't want a guess, you want clarity. The good news: much of it is only a few clicks and one conversation away.
-
Read your supplier's values
Under Section 46 of the Drinking Water Ordinance, water suppliers must publish current test results online, each with the limit value and testing frequency. As a rule, the results may not be more than a year old. They also include hardness, calcium, magnesium and potassium. Since the PFAS limit value came into force, values for the Sum of PFAS-20 should be listed there too. If you make a justified request, you can also get the information free of charge in other ways.
-
Check your building's plumbing
Ask when the building and its pipes were built, and take a look at visible pipes in the basement. For a building from before 1973 outside southern Germany, a close look is particularly worthwhile, for example in an old Berlin apartment building (Altbau). The waterworks' values say little about lead in your building, because lead comes mainly from pipes and components inside the building.
-
Have it tested if questions remain
Commission an approved testing laboratory if you are unsure. For lead, the water should have stood in the pipes for at least four hours beforehand. The health authority can tell you which test makes sense in your situation.
Knowledge comes before technology. Only when you know what is in your water can you decide whether a filter makes sense, and which one.
And now you know why your supplier's website and a look in the basement can bring more clarity than any test mark on a package.
What do the four KPNI lenses show, and what does that mean for you?
In short: The substances that matter in drinking water touch all four major regulatory systems. That is a reason for care, not for fear.
Perhaps you are now wondering: if so much is well regulated, why look so closely at all?
In clinical psychoneuroimmunology, KPNI for short, I look at four systems that are constantly talking to each other: the nervous system, the immune system, metabolism and the hormonal system. For drinking water, this results in a clear picture, but in some places also in open questions.
Nervous system
Lead can impair the development of the nervous system even in small amounts. In the pooled analysis of seven cohorts, the IQ loss per increase was particularly large in the low range. Unborn babies and young children are the most sensitive.
Immune system
For PFAS, a weaker vaccine response in children is considered the most sensitive finding, and EFSA's guidance value is based on it. Filters colonised by germs are a second, very practical question for your immune defences, especially when they are weakened.
Metabolism
EFSA emphasises that its PFAS guidance value is also intended to protect against other possible effects observed in humans. In observational studies, magnesium in water was associated with slightly fewer deaths from coronary heart disease.
Hormonal system
Whether PFAS influence the thyroid is an open question. A meta-analysis from Seoul found weak associations with total T4 in adults, but overall the picture remains inconsistent. Lead from the bones can return to the blood in phases of increased metabolism such as pregnancy.
I describe the connection between PFAS and hormones in more detail in the article on PFAS as a hormone topic.
Well established
- Tap water from large supply zones almost always meets the requirements.
- Lead harms the developing nervous system even in small amounts.
- Activated carbon filters can become colonised by germs, especially without care.
- Reverse osmosis can largely hold back PFAS.
Plausible, but not conclusively proven
- That household filters work as well over months of everyday use as in lab tests.
- That magnesium in drinking water influences heart health.
Open
- What role microplastics from tap water play for health.
- How strongly PFAS influence the thyroid.
- Whether filters further lower the small amount of microplastics in German tap water.
For me, this is where the biggest gain lies. You don't have to look at every glass of water with suspicion. And you don't have to buy every device that promises pure water. Freedom here means knowing the two questions that are usually enough: what does my supplier say? And what is inside my walls? Fear narrows your world. Knowledge brings calm.
Three levers for this week
- Check the values: Look up the current test results on your water supplier's website, including the Sum of PFAS-20.
- Clarify your pipes: Ask when your pipes were installed, look in the basement, and after a long standing time let the water run until it comes out cool.
- Take an honest look at your filter: If you filter, change the cartridge on schedule. If you have no specific reason, you are allowed to put the jug away in the cupboard.
Clean water does not begin with a device, but with a question. If you ask the right question, you often don't need a filter. And if you do need one, you will then know which.
I describe what detox in everyday life can look like without a programme in the article on gentle everyday detox.
And now you know why composure and care go well together when it comes to drinking water.
Frequently asked questions about water filters and tap water
Is a water filter for tap water worth it in Germany?
From a health perspective, a filter is usually not necessary for water from the public supply. In the report by the Federal Ministry of Health and the German Environment Agency (UBA) for 2020 to 2022, more than 99 percent of samples from large supply zones met the German Drinking Water Ordinance for most parameters. A filter can make sense with local PFAS contamination, with a specific test result from your pipes or if you have your own well. With lead pipes, the way forward is replacement, not a filter. And every filter needs care, otherwise it can itself become a source of germs.
Which PFAS limit values have applied to drinking water since 2026?
Since 12 January 2026, a limit value of 0.1 micrograms per litre has applied to the sum of 20 specific PFAS, the Sum of PFAS-20. From 12 January 2028, a limit value of 0.02 micrograms per litre will also apply to the sum of PFOA, PFNA, PFHxS and PFOS, the Sum of PFAS-4. From then on, both values must be met. Individual values below the limit of quantification are not counted in the sum. The four substances in the Sum of PFAS-4 are the same ones for which EFSA set a joint tolerable weekly intake in 2020.
Does a jug filter remove PFAS?
That depends heavily on the model and on the condition of the cartridge. In a test from Japan, the best of four jug filters held back more than 90 percent of six PFAS over the entire recommended lifetime, while the weakest held back less than 50 percent towards the end. Short-chain PFAS were held back less well in all models. A review from Genoa stresses that there are hardly any measurements from real everyday use. If PFAS are a proven problem in your water, reverse osmosis is among the more effective technologies.
What does reverse osmosis remove, and what is lost in the process?
In reverse osmosis, water is forced through a very fine membrane that holds back most dissolved substances. In a study from East China, household devices held back most PFAS almost entirely, regardless of chain length. At the same time, the water loses a large part of its calcium and magnesium. In observational studies, more magnesium in drinking water was associated with slightly lower mortality from coronary heart disease. In addition, depending on the device, part of the water goes down the drain unused, and the system needs regular maintenance.
Can a water filter remove lead from old pipes?
Filters certified for lead can clearly lower lead levels in tests. A review by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found values at or below the target value for 99 percent of these filters in field studies, and failures were linked, among other things, to incorrect operation and lack of maintenance. Even so, the German Environment Agency (UBA) does not consider filters for removing lead to be advisable, because they can unnecessarily contaminate drinking water with pathogens. In Germany, lead pipes have been banned since 12 January 2026 and must be removed or decommissioned. Replacement removes the source, a filter does not.
How do I recognise lead pipes in my building?
Lead pipes are only still found in older buildings constructed before 1973, and practically never in southern Germany. Unpainted, they are bluish grey to silvery grey, they are easy to scratch and they sound dull when tapped. They were often laid in wide curves rather than at right angles. Look at visible pipes in the basement before and after the water meter, and ask your landlord. For pipes concealed in the walls, a plumber can help, and if the situation is unclear, a water test can too.
Can water filters become contaminated with germs?
Yes, especially filters with activated carbon. In a study from Freiburg, the germ count in the filtered water rose in 24 of 34 jug filters from households, in the lab even at 4 °C, in individual cases up to 10,000 times the level in the tap water. A more recent genetic analysis found that 29 to 79 percent of the microbes in the filtered water came from the biofilm on the carbon. Rarely used filters appear to be particularly susceptible. Regular cartridge changes, clean jugs and drinking the water promptly can lower the risk.
How often should I change the filter cartridge?
At the latest after the time or the number of litres the manufacturer specifies, whichever comes first. Towards the end of its lifetime, filter performance can also drop noticeably. In one test, it fell below 50 percent for PFAS in one model. After longer breaks, such as a holiday, it is better to put in a new cartridge. If you hardly use the filter, doing without it can be the better choice. Taste is no yardstick here, because you cannot taste bacteria or PFAS.
Where can I find my water supplier's values?
Under the German Drinking Water Ordinance, water suppliers must publish current test results online, each with the limit value and testing frequency. As a rule, the results may not be more than a year old. They also include water hardness, calcium, magnesium and potassium. If you make a justified request, you can also get the information free of charge in other ways. The values describe the water from the mains network, not the pipes in your building.
Do water filters remove microplastics from tap water?
For German tap water, I have not found any robust study on this. The starting point is favourable, though: in drinking water from groundwater, a team from the Alfred Wegener Institute found an average of 0.7 plastic particles larger than 20 micrometres per cubic metre, in other words less than one in 1,000 litres. A research group from Aalborg estimated the possible intake via tap water at less than one particle per person per year. However, these measurements do not capture very small particles. For microplastics alone, a filter is therefore hardly the first lever.
What applies to pregnant women, infants and young children?
If there are lead pipes, the German Environment Agency (UBA) considers the water generally unsuitable for drinking and preparing food for pregnant women, infants and children up to six years of age. The alternative is bottled water labelled “suitable for the preparation of infant food” (in German: “Geeignet für die Zubereitung von Säuglingsnahrung”). For washing and showering, there are no health concerns related to the lead content. If you filter during these phases of life, pay particular attention to hygiene. If you have questions, talk to your midwife, your gynaecologist or your paediatrician.
What happens if my water supplier exceeds the PFAS limit value?
The operator must inform the local health authority (Gesundheitsamt) and investigate the cause. The health authority can authorise a temporary deviation if no harm to health is to be expected and the supply cannot reasonably be maintained in any other way. An action value (Maßnahmenwert) then applies, and the period may not exceed three years, with a one-off extension only in exceptional cases. If the deviation cannot be remedied within 30 days, the affected households must be informed and particularly vulnerable groups must be advised. In this case, follow the health authority's advice first.
Is hard water unhealthy?
Calcium and magnesium, which make water hard, are dietary minerals. In a meta-analysis of ten observational studies, more magnesium in drinking water was associated with slightly lower mortality from coronary heart disease, with a relative risk of 0.89. That is not proof of cause and effect. Limescale is more of an issue for kettles and coffee machines. A filter against limescale is therefore mainly a decision about comfort.
Further reading
All articles in the Detox Guide
- Liver detox: what counts and what is marketing
- Phase 1 and phase 2 of liver detoxification explained
- Raised liver values: the next steps
- Glutathione, the master antioxidant
- Coffee, cruciferous vegetables, garlic: foods for the detox phases
- Sulforaphane and broccoli
- Bitter compounds: dandelion, artichoke and digestion
- The gut, elimination and the enterohepatic circulation
- Alcohol and the liver: breakdown and protection
- Stimulating and supporting the lymphatic system
- Kidneys and water in detoxification
- Raised creatinine: kidneys, muscles or creatine?
- Sauna and sweating for detox
- Detox through the skin: myth and benefit
- Tongue coating, bad breath, rashes: detox signals?
- Fasting as detox: autophagy instead of “waste deposits”
- Tired and drained: is detoxification behind it?
- Detox programmes, juice cleanses and detox teas: a critical look
- Alkaline cleanses and overacidification
- Gentle everyday detox without a programme
- Detox after antibiotics and medication
- Microplastics in the body: what studies show
- Pesticides on fruit and vegetables
- The glymphatic system: clearing up during sleep
Sources
- Umweltbundesamt, Bundesministerium für Gesundheit. Bericht des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit und des Umweltbundesamtes an die Verbraucherinnen und Verbraucher über die Qualität von Wasser für den menschlichen Gebrauch (Trinkwasser) in Deutschland (2020-2022). Umwelt & Gesundheit 03/2025. Februar 2025. Online: umweltbundesamt.de [Government document, report to consumers]
- Verordnung über die Qualität von Wasser für den menschlichen Gebrauch (Trinkwasserverordnung, TrinkwV), in Kraft seit 24. Juni 2023, insbesondere § 10, § 17, § 46, § 52, § 66 und Anlage 2. Online: gesetze-im-internet.de [Government document, statutory ordinance]
- EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM), Schrenk D, Bignami M, Bodin L et al. Risk to human health related to the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances in food. EFSA J. 2020;18(9):e06223. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6223 [Government document, EFSA scientific opinion]
- Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung. Gekommen, um zu bleiben: Per- und polyfluorierte Alkylsubstanzen (PFAS) in Lebensmitteln und der Umwelt. Fragen und Antworten, Stand 31.03.2026. Online: bfr.bund.de [Government document, BfR questions and answers]
- Grandjean P, Andersen EW, Budtz-Jørgensen E et al. Serum vaccine antibody concentrations in children exposed to perfluorinated compounds. JAMA. 2012;307(4):391-397. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.2034 [Cohort, prospective birth cohort, n=587]
- Duffek A, Conrad A, Kolossa-Gehring M et al. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in blood plasma: Results of the German Environmental Survey for children and adolescents 2014-2017 (GerES V). Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2020;228:113549. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113549 [Real-World, population-representative biomonitoring, n=1,109]
- Hölzer J, Göen T, Rauchfuss K et al. One-year follow-up of perfluorinated compounds in plasma of German residents from Arnsberg formerly exposed to PFOA-contaminated drinking water. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2009;212(5):499-504. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2009.04.003 [Cohort, one-year follow-up, n=288]
- Lahne H, Gerstner D, Völkel W et al. Human biomonitoring follow-up study on PFOA contamination and investigation of possible influencing factors on PFOA exposure in a German population originally exposed to emissions from a fluoropolymer production plant. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2024;259:114387. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2024.114387 [Cohort, follow-up study, n=764]
- Umweltbundesamt. Bleirohre: Blei im Trinkwasser ist gesundheitsgefährdend. Umwelttipps für den Alltag, aktualisiert am 04.08.2026. Online: umweltbundesamt.de [Government document, consumer information]
- Umweltbundesamt. Verbot von Trinkwasserrohren aus Blei. Verbot gilt seit dem 12. Januar 2026. Faltblatt, Stand Juni 2026. Online: umweltbundesamt.de (PDF) [Government document, leaflet]
- Lanphear BP, Hornung R, Khoury J et al. Low-level environmental lead exposure and children's intellectual function: an international pooled analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(7):894-899. Berichtigung: Environ Health Perspect. 2019;127(9):99001. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7688 and 10.1289/EHP5685 [Cohort, pooled analysis of seven cohorts, n=1,333]
- Hanna-Attisha M, LaChance J, Sadler RC, Champney Schnepp A. Elevated blood lead levels in children associated with the Flint drinking water crisis: a spatial analysis of risk and public health response. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(2):283-290. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.303003 [Real-World, retrospective spatial analysis]
- Tang M, Lytle D, Achtemeier R, Tully J. Reviewing performance of NSF/ANSI 53 certified water filters for lead removal. Water Res. 2023;244:120425. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.120425 [Review, 23 studies, 1,678 filters]
- Iwabuchi K, Sato I. Effectiveness of household water purifiers in removing perfluoroalkyl substances from drinking water. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021;28(9):11665-11671. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-11757-1 [In vitro, lab test of four jug filters]
- He A, Lu Y, Chen F et al. Exploring the origin of efficient adsorption of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances in household point-of-use water purifiers: deep insights from a joint experimental and computational study. Sci Total Environ. 2022;831:154988. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154988 [Real-World, field measurement plus mechanistic analysis]
- Zhang X, Wang D, Wang K et al. Legacy and novel per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in tap water from East China: impact from water sources and risk mitigation by household purifiers. Environ Sci Technol. 2025;59(32):17210-17221. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5c03293 [Real-World, tap water and household devices in East China]
- MacKeown H, Magi E, Di Carro M, Benedetti B. Removal of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances from tap water by means of point-of-use treatment: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2024;954:176764. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176764 [Review, overview of household devices against PFAS]
- Daschner FD, Rüden H, Simon R, Clotten J. Microbiological contamination of drinking water in a commercial household water filter system. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996;15(3):233-237. DOI: 10.1007/BF01591360 [Real-World, testing of 34 filters from households plus lab test]
- Zhou Z, Xu L, Zhu L et al. Metagenomic analysis of microbiota and antibiotic resistome in household activated carbon drinking water purifiers. Environ Int. 2021;148:106394. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106394 [In vitro, operating trial with six devices, metagenomics]
- Mulhern R, Stallard M, Zanib H et al. Are carbon water filters safe for private wells? Evaluating the occurrence of microbial indicator organisms in private well water treated by point-of-use activated carbon block filters. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2021;238:113852. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113852 [Real-World, field study in 17 households]
- Tobin RS, Smith DK, Lindsay JA. Effects of activated carbon and bacteriostatic filters on microbiological quality of drinking water. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981;41(3):646-651. DOI: 10.1128/aem.41.3.646-651.1981 [In vitro, lab and field test of three activated carbon filters]
- Jiang L, He P, Chen J et al. Magnesium levels in drinking water and coronary heart disease mortality risk: a meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2016;8(1):5. DOI: 10.3390/nu8010005 [Meta-analysis, k=10, 77,821 cases]
- Huang Y, Wang J, Tan Y et al. Low-mineral direct drinking water in school may retard height growth and increase dental caries in schoolchildren in China. Environ Int. 2018;115:104-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.02.021 [Real-World, ecological observational study, n=29,884]
- Mintenig SM, Löder MGJ, Primpke S, Gerdts G. Low numbers of microplastics detected in drinking water from ground water sources. Sci Total Environ. 2019;648:631-635. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.178 [Real-World, measurement along a drinking water supply]
- Kirstein IV, Hensel F, Gomiero A et al. Drinking plastics? Quantification and qualification of microplastics in drinking water distribution systems by µFTIR and Py-GCMS. Water Res. 2021;188:116519. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116519 [Real-World, measurement in drinking water networks]
- Koelmans AA, Mohamed Nor NH, Hermsen E et al. Microplastics in freshwaters and drinking water: critical review and assessment of data quality. Water Res. 2019;155:410-422. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.02.054 [Review, quality assessment of 50 studies]
- Kim MJ, Moon S, Oh BC et al. Association between perfluoroalkyl substances exposure and thyroid function in adults: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0197244. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197244 [Meta-analysis, k=12]
Putting the evidence in context: All studies were checked via PubMed against title, authors, year, journal and DOI, and key papers were additionally checked via Consensus and the DOI registry. Figures on study results come from the respective abstracts, and for the lead study from the correction published in 2019. Limit values and deadlines come from the text of the Ordinance and from publications by the German Environment Agency.
Well established are the quality of drinking water in large supply zones, the harmfulness of lead to the developing nervous system and the colonisation of activated carbon filters by germs. How household filters perform over months of everyday use, on the other hand, has barely been studied, and many data come from lab tests or from outside Germany. Associations between minerals in water and health come from observational studies and do not prove cause and effect.
This article is for information only and does not replace medical advice, a water test or information from your local health authority. It contains no recommendation for specific products or brands.