Muscle Loss with Age (Sarcopenia): Why It Starts Earlier Than You Think
Sarcopenia sounds like something from a nursing home. Yet it begins quietly, often between 30 and 40. If you know the early signs, you can start counteracting it much sooner, with protein and a clear training stimulus.
We talk about muscle as if it were about looks. Yet it is your metabolic organ, your fall protection and your ticket to independence. Muscle is not vanity. Muscle is freedom in later life.
The moment you first notice it
You lift the crate of water bottles out of the car boot. It used to be effortless. Today you feel your back and pause for a moment.
Or you get up from the sofa and, without thinking, push yourself up with your hands. The stairs to the third floor feel longer than they did five years ago. Jam jar lids have somehow become tighter.
I bet you have filed this under normal ageing so far. Maybe with a smile. May I ask you an uncomfortable question? What if these small moments are the first signals of a process you can still influence quite well?
Sarcopenia is not a sudden event at 80. It is more like a savings account with a small amount withdrawn every year. If you take a look at 40, you help decide how much is still in the account at 75.
And now you know why this article is not only written for people over 70.
What sarcopenia means today
For a long time, sarcopenia was simply seen as a loss of muscle mass. That view has changed. Today something else is at the centre: your strength.
Sarcopenia is a muscle disease, and strength comes first
In 2019, the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People, led by Cruz-Jentoft, fundamentally revised its definition.
It describes sarcopenia as muscle failure that builds up from adverse changes across the whole lifespan. Low muscle strength is the key feature. Low muscle quantity or quality confirms the diagnosis, and poor physical performance indicates a severe form. The group explicitly states that sarcopenia can also occur earlier in life.
For you, this means: it is not the tape measure that decides, but the question of what your muscles can still do.
Cruz-Jentoft AJ et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16-31. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afy169How common is it? The figures vary widely depending on which definition is used. A large meta-analysis from Glasgow pooled 151 studies with almost 700,000 people.
The range in younger people is wide and depends heavily on the measurement methods. But it shows that the topic does not only begin at retirement age. A review in the Lancet by Cruz-Jentoft and Sayer also emphasises that sarcopenia can occur in midlife in connection with various diseases.
You do not have to look thin and frail to be affected. A shrinking muscle can also hide behind a normal or higher body weight. The scale only tells you half the story.
And now you know why the modern definition starts with a strength value and not with a weight.
Why the decline starts earlier than you think
Imagine your muscle as a city that is constantly being rebuilt. Every day, old buildings are torn down and new ones are put up. As long as demolition and construction are in balance, the city stays the same size. When construction slows down, it shrinks. Very quietly, street by street.
Relative muscle mass declines from the third decade of life
In 2000, Janssen and colleagues from Queen's University in Canada measured the muscles of 468 women and men aged 18 to 88 using whole-body MRI.
The share of muscle in body weight already declined from the third decade of life. A clear drop in absolute muscle mass appeared toward the end of the fifth decade, especially in the legs.
For you, this means: the course is set between 30 and 50. And the legs that are meant to carry you later are the first to lose.
Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Wang ZM, Ross R. Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18-88 yr. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89(1):81-8. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2000.89.1.81Even more important is what happens to strength. This is the core of why I see sarcopenia as an early warning topic.
Strength is lost about three times faster than mass
In the US Health ABC study, Goodpaster and colleagues followed 1,880 older adults for three years and measured leg strength and muscle mass.
Depending on the group, leg strength declined by 2.6 to 4.1 percent per year. That was about three times faster than the loss of leg muscle mass of roughly one percent per year. Maintaining or gaining mass did not protect against the loss of strength.
For you, this means: muscle quality counts. It is not only about how much muscle you have, but how well it works and how well it is activated.
Goodpaster BH et al. The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass, and quality in older adults: the health, aging and body composition study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(10):1059-64. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/61.10.1059Quiet beginning
Relative muscle mass can decline, especially when everyday movement decreases and body fat increases. Usually nothing is noticeable yet.
First signals
Carrying heavy things, climbing stairs and getting up feel more effortful. In women, the hormonal shift around menopause can additionally speed up the process.
Measurable decline
Absolute muscle mass, especially in the legs, decreases more clearly. Strength declines faster than mass.
Consequences in daily life
Fall risk, frailty and loss of independence move closer. A hospital stay with bed rest can intensify the decline within a short time.
The good news lies in the same timeline. What develops over decades can be influenced over years. Muscle is one of the most adaptable tissues in your body, even at 60, 70 or 80.
And now you know why strength is your most important early warning signal.
How you can recognise early warning signs
You do not need a lab for a first assessment. Two simple tests, which EWGSOP2 also uses, give you an honest look at your strength.
Your quick self-check
- Chair stand test: Sit on a normal chair with your arms crossed over your chest. Stand up and sit down again five times, as quickly as you safely can. More than 15 seconds is considered a sign of low strength according to EWGSOP2.
- Grip strength: Measured with a hand dynamometer. EWGSOP2 gives cut-off values of below 27 kilograms for men and below 16 kilograms for women.
- Everyday signs: You push yourself up when standing, avoid stairs, prefer carrying groceries in several trips, or have tripped recently.
- Walking speed: If others regularly overtake you on walks, that can also be a signal. Slow walking speed is considered a sign of weaker performance in diagnostics.
An abnormal test is not a diagnosis. Joint pain, heart, lungs, thyroid or medication can also affect the values. A self-check is a reason to look more closely, not a verdict.
Why grip strength in particular gets so much attention is shown by one of the largest studies on this topic.
The hand as a window into health
In the PURE study, Leong and colleagues measured the grip strength of almost 140,000 people aged 35 to 70 in 17 countries and followed them for a median of four years.
Every 5 kilograms lower grip strength was associated with a 16 percent higher risk of death. Grip strength even predicted all-cause and cardiovascular mortality more strongly than systolic blood pressure.
For you, this means: strength is not a fitness detail, but a health marker. Whether gaining strength lowers the risk, however, was not examined in this study.
Leong DP et al. Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet. 2015;386(9990):266-73. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62000-6Sarcopenia and falls are closely linked
In 2019, Yeung and colleagues from Amsterdam and Melbourne analysed studies with more than 45,000 older adults.
In prospective studies, people with sarcopenia had 1.89 times higher odds of falling and 1.71 times higher odds of fractures than people without sarcopenia.
For you, this means: muscles are your built-in airbag. They can catch a stumble before it turns into a fall.
Yeung SSY et al. Sarcopenia and its association with falls and fractures in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019;10(3):485-500. DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12411If you push yourself up when standing, that is not a matter of character and no reason for shame. It is information. And information is something you can use.
And now you know why a chair and five repetitions can reveal more about you than some lab values.
Muscle as a metabolic organ: the four lenses
If we only see muscles as an engine, we miss the most important part. From the perspective of KPNI, Clinical Psychoneuroimmunology, muscle is an organ that communicates with the nerves, the immune system, metabolism and hormones.
Metabolism
After a meal, skeletal muscle takes up a large share of blood sugar. Less muscle means less storage space for sugar. This may favour insulin resistance.
Nervous system
With age, motor nerve cells that activate individual muscle fibres are lost. This could explain why strength fades faster than mass.
Immune system
Quiet, chronic inflammation, often called inflammaging, can slow muscle building. Working muscle, on the other hand, releases messenger substances that may have an anti-inflammatory effect.
Hormonal system
Falling levels of testosterone, oestrogen and growth hormone can slow down rebuilding. In women going through menopause, this effect is often clearly noticeable.
More muscle mass goes along with better insulin sensitivity
Srikanthan and Karlamangla from the University of California, Los Angeles, analysed data from 13,644 adults in the US NHANES III survey.
Every 10 percent higher share of muscle in body weight was associated with 11 percent lower insulin resistance and a 12 percent lower prevalence of prediabetes, independent of overweight.
For you, this means: muscles may be one of your most important allies for stable blood sugar. A cross-sectional study, however, shows associations, not causes.
Srikanthan P, Karlamangla AS. Relative muscle mass is inversely associated with insulin resistance and prediabetes. Findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(9):2898-903. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2011-0435Muscle is not only what moves you. Muscle is what supports your blood sugar, your stability and your independence.
This is where what the studies reliably show ends. The connections between nerves, inflammation and hormones are mechanistically well founded, but not every link has yet been shown in detail in humans. I use the four lenses as a map, not as a finished answer.
And now you know why muscle loss is more than a cosmetic problem.
Anabolic resistance: why your muscle needs to be addressed more loudly
Maybe this sounds familiar: you actually eat reasonably well, move now and then, and still little changes. That is not due to a lack of effort. It is due to a phenomenon with an unwieldy name.
Anabolic resistance means that ageing muscle becomes hard of hearing for building signals. Imagine talking to someone whose hearing is getting worse. You do not have to say something different, but you do have to speak more clearly and more loudly. For muscle, louder means more protein per meal and a clear training stimulus.
Older muscles need more protein per meal for the same response
Moore and colleagues from Toronto and Hamilton combined measurements of muscle protein synthesis in healthy older men around 71 years of age and young men around 22.
In the younger men, muscle protein synthesis peaked at about 0.24 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight in one meal. In the older men, this point was at about 0.40 grams.
For you, this means: a small portion of protein that is still enough at 25 might barely trigger a building signal at 70.
Moore DR et al. Protein ingestion to stimulate myofibrillar protein synthesis requires greater relative protein intakes in healthy older versus younger men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015;70(1):57-62. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glu103In their review, Breen and Phillips from McMaster University describe that the basal rate of building and breakdown stays largely the same in healthy ageing. What changes is the response to stimuli. They discuss that spreading protein evenly across the day and getting enough leucine could be useful. Leucine is an amino acid regarded as a kind of start switch for muscle building.
A pattern I often see in people's diets is a low-protein breakfast, a medium-sized lunch and a large dinner. Over the day, the total is sometimes enough. Per meal, however, the muscle often stays below its threshold.
This observation does not replace a study. But it fits well with what metabolic research describes about anabolic resistance.
If training and food seem to do less for you over the years, it does not mean your body has given up. It just needs a clearer signal. That is a task you can work on, not the end of the road.
And now you know why the amount per meal can become more important with age.
Protein: what the professional societies recommend
The classic recommendation for adults is 0.8 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight. For older adults, two European expert groups see it differently.
Older adults need more protein than younger ones
In 2013, the PROT-AGE Study Group led by Bauer reassessed the needs of older adults on behalf of the European Geriatric Medicine Society. A year later, the ESPEN Expert Group led by Deutz reached very similar conclusions.
Both recommend at least 1.0 to 1.2 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day for healthy older adults. PROT-AGE suggests at least 1.2 grams for active people and 1.2 to 1.5 grams in acute or chronic illness. The exception is people with severe kidney disease who are not on dialysis. Both groups emphasise that physical activity and strength training belong in the picture.
For you, this means: protein and movement are a pair. One without the other often falls short of its potential.
Bauer J et al. Evidence-based recommendations for optimal dietary protein intake in older people: a position paper from the PROT-AGE Study Group. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(8):542-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.05.021 · Deutz NE et al. Protein intake and exercise for optimal muscle function with aging: recommendations from the ESPEN Expert Group. Clin Nutr. 2014;33(6):929-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.04.007Good protein sources include eggs, dairy products such as quark, yoghurt and cheese, legumes such as lentils, chickpeas and beans, tofu and tempeh, as well as good-quality meat and poultry. Plant sources combine well, so the amino acid profile becomes more complete.
Protein can enhance the training effect, but within limits
In 2018, Morton and colleagues around Phillips analysed randomised trials with strength training lasting at least six weeks.
Additional protein moderately increased gains in strength and lean mass. Above a total intake of about 1.6 grams per kilogram per day, there was no further gain in lean mass. With increasing age, the additional effect was smaller.
For you, this means: more is not endlessly better. And especially later in life, training is the stimulus that protein responds to.
Morton RW et al. A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength in healthy adults. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(6):376-384. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097608If you have reduced kidney function, diabetes with kidney involvement, or regularly take medication that affects the kidneys, you should agree on your protein amount with a physician. The figures given here are recommendations from the literature, not a personal prescription.
Many people eat less as they get older because their appetite fades, and without realising it they cut back on protein first. That is exactly when the muscle would need more of it. A protein-rich breakfast can be a small but effective lever in everyday life.
And now you know why protein in later life is not a bodybuilder topic, but a health topic.
Strength training: the stimulus everything is waiting for
Maybe strength training makes you think of heavy dumbbells and loud gyms. Maybe you also think it is too late for that now. The data paint a different picture.
Strength gains of roughly a quarter to a third
In 2010, Peterson and colleagues from the University of Michigan pooled studies on strength training in adults aged 50 and over.
Depending on the exercise, strength increased by an average of 24 to 33 percent. Higher training intensity was associated with larger gains.
For you, this means: your muscle can still respond clearly to training in the second half of life. What matters is that the stimulus is challenging enough.
Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Sen A, Gordon PM. Resistance exercise for muscular strength in older adults: a meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2010;9(3):226-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2010.03.004Breen and Phillips also point out that training with lighter loads and more repetitions can trigger a strong building response if it comes close to fatigue. That can be a good entry point for people with sensitive joints.
What about vitamin D and creatine?
These two terms come up almost every time muscles in later life are discussed. Both deserve an honest, balanced assessment.
Vitamin D: a small effect on strength
In 2014, Beaudart and colleagues from the University of Liège analysed randomised trials of vitamin D supplementation.
They found a small positive effect on muscle strength, but no measurable effect on muscle mass or muscle power. The effect was clearer in marked deficiency below 30 nmol/l and in people aged 65 and over.
For you, this means: vitamin D is more of a building block than an engine. It makes sense to measure first rather than supplement blindly.
Beaudart C et al. The effects of vitamin D on skeletal muscle strength, muscle mass, and muscle power: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(11):4336-45. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2014-1742Creatine: added benefit, but only together with training
In 2017, Chilibeck and colleagues from Saskatchewan and Regina pooled studies on creatine during strength training in older adults.
With creatine, lean mass increased on average by 1.37 kilograms more than with placebo. Strength in the chest press and leg press also rose somewhat more.
For you, this means: creatine may enhance the training effect. It cannot replace training. If you have kidney disease, raise the question with a physician beforehand.
Chilibeck PD, Kaviani M, Candow DG, Zello GA. Effect of creatine supplementation during resistance training on lean tissue mass and muscular strength in older adults: a meta-analysis. Open Access J Sports Med. 2017;8:213-226. DOI: 10.2147/OAJSM.S123529For many people, supplements are the most convenient way to start, because they take no willpower. I understand that well. In my view, though, the order matters: first the training stimulus and adequate protein intake, then targeted testing and supplementation where a deficiency exists.
In later life, strength training is not a question of performance, but a question of prevention. You are not training for the gym. You are training for the day you lift up your grandchildren, carry your own suitcase, or stay on your feet after a stumble.
And now you know why the training stimulus is the foundation and everything else builds on it.
Three levers you can start with today
You do not have to rebuild your whole life. A few clear steps that you can keep up over time are often enough.
Measure strength
Do the chair stand test and write down the time. Repeat it every few months. This way you can see your trend long before daily life becomes hard.
Spread protein
Check whether each of your main meals contains a real protein source. Breakfast in particular is often the biggest gap.
Set a stimulus
Schedule fixed times for strength training that challenges your large muscle groups, especially the legs. Get guidance when you start if you have pre-existing conditions.
If you are unsure which amount of protein, which type of training or which lab values are right for you, a conversation with a physician is the right next step. Every body brings its own story.
And now you know why sarcopenia is an early warning topic and not fate.
You might also be interested in
Strength training after 40
Why muscles can be your longevity insurance.
Hormones and exerciseStrength training in menopause
When oestrogen falls and muscles count more than ever.
FastingFasting and muscle loss
What is true about the myth and what is not.
SupplementsTaking vitamin D correctly
The role of magnesium and K2.
MetabolismBlood sugar and insulin resistance
How metabolism and lifestyle are connected.
ExerciseStrengthening mitochondria
What movement can change in your cellular power plants.
Frequently asked questions about sarcopenia and muscle loss
What exactly is sarcopenia?
According to the European Working Group EWGSOP2, sarcopenia is a muscle disease, a form of muscle failure that builds up from adverse changes across the whole lifespan. Today its key feature is reduced muscle strength.
Low muscle quantity or quality confirms the diagnosis, and poor physical performance indicates a severe form. Sarcopenia is common in older adults, but it can also occur earlier in life.
At what age does muscle loss begin?
In an MRI study of 468 women and men aged 18 to 88, relative muscle mass already declined from the third decade of life. A clear drop in absolute muscle mass appeared toward the end of the fifth decade, especially in the legs.
So the process starts quietly, long before you notice it in the mirror or in everyday life.
Why does muscle strength matter more than muscle mass?
In the Health ABC study of 1,880 older adults, leg strength was lost about three times faster than leg muscle mass, which declined by roughly one percent per year. Maintaining or even gaining mass did not protect against the loss of strength.
That is why EWGSOP2 puts strength at the start of the diagnostic process. Besides quantity, strength also reflects muscle quality and how well the nervous system activates the muscle.
How can I test myself to see whether I am at risk?
Two simple tests can give you first clues. In the chair stand test, you stand up from a chair five times in a row without using your arms. If this takes longer than 15 seconds, EWGSOP2 considers it a sign of reduced strength.
Grip strength is measured with a hand dynamometer, and the cut-off values are below 27 kilograms for men and below 16 kilograms for women. An abnormal result is not a diagnosis, but a reason for a medical assessment.
How much protein do older adults need?
The PROT-AGE Study Group and the ESPEN Expert Group recommend at least 1.0 to 1.2 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day for healthy older adults. For active people, PROT-AGE suggests at least 1.2 grams, and 1.2 to 1.5 grams in acute or chronic illness.
An important exception is people with severe kidney disease who are not on dialysis, who may need to limit their protein intake. Your individual amount should always fit your health and your kidney values.
What does anabolic resistance mean?
Anabolic resistance describes how ageing muscles respond more weakly to building stimuli such as protein and strength training. In an analysis by Moore and colleagues, older men only reached maximal muscle protein synthesis at around 0.40 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per meal, while younger men reached it at about 0.24 grams.
This is why spreading protein evenly across meals and getting enough leucine are being discussed.
Is strength training still worth it later in life?
Yes, the evidence here is fairly consistent. A meta-analysis of 47 studies with 1,079 participants aged 50 and over found strength gains of about 24 to 33 percent, depending on the exercise. Higher training intensity was associated with larger gains.
How intensely you can start depends on your starting point, your joints and any pre-existing conditions, and it should be planned individually.
Can vitamin D slow muscle loss?
Vitamin D may make a small contribution, but it is no substitute for training and protein. A meta-analysis of 30 randomised trials with 5,615 participants found a small positive effect on muscle strength, but no measurable effect on muscle mass or muscle power.
The effect was clearer in people with marked deficiency and in those over 65. So it makes sense to measure your level first.
Does creatine make sense for older adults?
Creatine is one of the most thoroughly studied supplements in strength sports. A meta-analysis of 22 studies with 721 older adults found that creatine during strength training led on average to 1.37 kilograms more lean mass and somewhat larger strength gains than placebo.
The effect occurred in combination with training, not instead of it. If you have kidney disease or take medication, you should discuss it with a physician before taking it.
Why does muscle loss raise the risk of diabetes?
Skeletal muscle is one of the most important organs for taking up blood sugar after a meal. In an analysis of 13,644 participants in the US NHANES III survey, every 10 percent higher muscle share was associated with 11 percent lower insulin resistance and a 12 percent lower prevalence of prediabetes.
This is an association from a cross-sectional study, not proof of cause and effect, but it fits well with the physiology.
Sources
All studies were checked via PubMed for title, authors, year, journal and DOI. Figures come from the respective abstracts. The statements on the nervous system, inflammation and hormones in the KPNI section are mechanistically founded, but not supported in every detail by large human studies. The notes from clinical practice are clinical observations, not study results. This article does not replace a medical examination or individual advice.
- Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, Cooper C, Landi F, Rolland Y, Sayer AA, Schneider SM, Sieber CC, Topinkova E, Vandewoude M, Visser M, Zamboni M. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16-31. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afy169 [Review, EWGSOP2 consensus statement]
- Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Sayer AA. Sarcopenia. Lancet. 2019;393(10191):2636-2646. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31138-9 [Review, Lancet Seminar]
- Petermann-Rocha F, Balntzi V, Gray SR, Lara J, Ho FK, Pell JP, Celis-Morales C. Global prevalence of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022;13(1):86-99. DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12783 [Meta-analysis, k=151 studies, n=692,056]
- Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Wang ZM, Ross R. Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18-88 yr. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89(1):81-8. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2000.89.1.81 [Real-world, MRI cross-sectional study, n=468]
- Goodpaster BH, Park SW, Harris TB, Kritchevsky SB, Nevitt M, Schwartz AV, Simonsick EM, Tylavsky FA, Visser M, Newman AB. The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass, and quality in older adults: the health, aging and body composition study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(10):1059-64. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/61.10.1059 [Cohort, Health ABC, n=1,880, 3 years]
- Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Avezum A, Orlandini A, Seron P, Ahmed SH, Rosengren A, Kelishadi R, Rahman O, Swaminathan S, Iqbal R, Gupta R, Lear SA, Oguz A, Yusoff K, Zatonska K, Chifamba J, Igumbor E, Mohan V, Anjana RM, Gu H, Li W, Yusuf S. Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet. 2015;386(9990):266-73. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62000-6 [Cohort, prospective, 17 countries, n=139,691]
- Yeung SSY, Reijnierse EM, Pham VK, Trappenburg MC, Lim WK, Meskers CGM, Maier AB. Sarcopenia and its association with falls and fractures in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019;10(3):485-500. DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12411 [Meta-analysis, k=33 studies, n=45,926]
- Srikanthan P, Karlamangla AS. Relative muscle mass is inversely associated with insulin resistance and prediabetes. Findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(9):2898-903. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2011-0435 [Real-world, cross-sectional analysis NHANES III, n=13,644]
- Moore DR, Churchward-Venne TA, Witard O, Breen L, Burd NA, Tipton KD, Phillips SM. Protein ingestion to stimulate myofibrillar protein synthesis requires greater relative protein intakes in healthy older versus younger men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015;70(1):57-62. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glu103 [Pathophysiology, retrospective analysis of pooled tracer studies]
- Breen L, Phillips SM. Skeletal muscle protein metabolism in the elderly: Interventions to counteract the 'anabolic resistance' of ageing. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2011;8:68. DOI: 10.1186/1743-7075-8-68 [Mechanistic review]
- Bauer J, Biolo G, Cederholm T, Cesari M, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Morley JE, Phillips S, Sieber C, Stehle P, Teta D, Visvanathan R, Volpi E, Boirie Y. Evidence-based recommendations for optimal dietary protein intake in older people: a position paper from the PROT-AGE Study Group. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(8):542-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.05.021 [Review, PROT-AGE consensus position paper]
- Deutz NE, Bauer JM, Barazzoni R, Biolo G, Boirie Y, Bosy-Westphal A, Cederholm T, Cruz-Jentoft A, Krznariç Z, Nair KS, Singer P, Teta D, Tipton K, Calder PC. Protein intake and exercise for optimal muscle function with aging: recommendations from the ESPEN Expert Group. Clin Nutr. 2014;33(6):929-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.04.007 [Review, ESPEN expert recommendation]
- Morton RW, Murphy KT, McKellar SR, Schoenfeld BJ, Henselmans M, Helms E, Aragon AA, Devries MC, Banfield L, Krieger JW, Phillips SM. A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength in healthy adults. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(6):376-384. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097608 [Meta-analysis, k=49 RCTs, n=1,863]
- Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Sen A, Gordon PM. Resistance exercise for muscular strength in older adults: a meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2010;9(3):226-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2010.03.004 [Meta-analysis, k=47 studies, n=1,079]
- Beaudart C, Buckinx F, Rabenda V, Gillain S, Cavalier E, Slomian J, Petermans J, Reginster JY, Bruyère O. The effects of vitamin D on skeletal muscle strength, muscle mass, and muscle power: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(11):4336-45. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2014-1742 [Meta-analysis, k=30 RCTs, n=5,615]
- Chilibeck PD, Kaviani M, Candow DG, Zello GA. Effect of creatine supplementation during resistance training on lean tissue mass and muscular strength in older adults: a meta-analysis. Open Access J Sports Med. 2017;8:213-226. DOI: 10.2147/OAJSM.S123529 [Meta-analysis, k=22 RCTs, n=721]