Sports Guide · Training and the Nervous System

HIIT or calm endurance training: Which fits your nervous system?

The first question may not be the type of training, but your stress state. A decision logic based on resilience rather than a matter of belief.

SJShukri Jarmoukli · Physician, Integrative Medicine · ViveCura Berlin
My starting point

The question "HIIT or endurance?" is usually argued like a war of beliefs. I see it differently. A more useful question may be: How much stress can your system process today?

Do you know this feeling after a workout?

You gave it everything. Forty seconds flat out, twenty seconds rest. Eight rounds. Afterwards you lie on the mat and feel strong.

And then the night comes. You lie awake. Your heart is still pounding at midnight. The next morning you feel irritable and tired at the same time.

Or you know the opposite. You jog calmly through the park. No ambition, no heart rate at the limit. And afterwards you feel as if everything has been put back in order.

Both can be the same person. On different days. In different phases of life. That is exactly what this article is about.

Reframe

Training is not only muscle work. Training is a message to your nervous system. Whether that message arrives as a growth stimulus or as an additional alarm may depend on the state your system is in when it receives it.

HIIT and endurance: two languages for your body

Imagine your stress system as a music amplifier. HIIT turns the dial all the way up for a short time. Calm endurance training keeps it at medium volume for a long time.

Both signals can trigger adaptation. But they speak to different parts of your physiology.

HIIT

  • Short, very intense efforts with rest periods
  • Strong stimulus for oxygen uptake and insulin sensitivity
  • Marked short-term rise in ACTH and cortisol
  • Needs a stable stress axis and good recovery

Calm endurance (Zone 2)

  • Long sessions at a pace where you can still talk
  • Can also support mitochondria and endurance
  • Smaller stress stimulus for the hormonal axis
  • Often well tolerated, even in demanding phases

What does research say about the pure performance question? Here the data are fairly clear.

Meta-analysis · Humans

A team led by Zoran Milanović analyzed 28 controlled studies with 723 healthy adults. Both endurance training and HIIT clearly improved maximal oxygen uptake, with HIIT ahead by only about 1.2 ml/kg/min. For you, this means: both paths can make you fitter, and the difference is smaller than the fitness world often suggests.

Milanović Z et al. Sports Med. 2015;45(10):1469-81. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-015-0365-0
Meta-analysis · Humans

A team from the Diabetes Research Centre at the University of Leicester pooled 50 studies on HIIT and glucose metabolism. HIIT lowered insulin resistance more than no exercise and slightly more than continuous training, and in people with type 2 diabetes or at risk of it, fasting glucose also fell. For your metabolism, HIIT can therefore be a particularly efficient stimulus.

Jelleyman C et al. Obes Rev. 2015;16(11):942-61. DOI: 10.1111/obr.12317

If HIIT is so efficient, why not always do HIIT? Because performance is only one side of the equation. The other side is your stress budget.

And now you know why the question "which is better?" may not have a good answer without considering your current state.

What happens in your stress axis at high intensity?

Maybe you have already noticed that some sessions charge you up and others drain you. That is not just in your head. Endocrinology may help explain it.

Your HPA axis, meaning hypothalamus, pituitary and adrenal glands, responds to intensity a bit like a smoke detector responds to heat. Below a threshold it stays quiet. Above it, it goes off.

Controlled study · Humans

A research group at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill had twelve trained men exercise for 30 minutes each at 40, 60 and 80 percent of their maximal oxygen uptake. Cortisol rose by about 40 percent at 60 percent and by about 83 percent at 80 percent, while at 40 percent a slight decrease was even seen after correction. For you, this means: calm training may ease the load on your stress axis, while intense training deliberately challenges it.

Hill EE et al. J Endocrinol Invest. 2008;31(7):587-91. DOI: 10.1007/BF03345606
Randomized crossover study · Humans

An Australian and New Zealand team led by Jonathan Peake compared a HIIT session with a moderate session of the same workload in ten cyclists. Immediately after HIIT, ACTH, cortisol and growth hormone were higher than after the moderate session. So even with the same energy expenditure, intensity appears to send a different hormonal signal.

Peake JM et al. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014;307(7):E539-52. DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00276.2014

In a well-rested system, this rise in cortisol is a healthy training stimulus. It is part of adaptation. The problem may begin when the stimulus hits a system that has already been on alert all day.

A shift in perspective

Cortisol is not your enemy. It is the messenger that tells your body: performance is needed now. But if you are already constantly receiving messengers from work, lack of sleep and worries, one more loud messenger might mean overload rather than growth.

And now you know why the same HIIT session may feel very different on a relaxed vacation day than after a week full of deadlines.

The four KPNI lenses: why intensity affects more than muscles

From the perspective of Clinical Psychoneuroimmunology, training is an event for the whole organism. Four systems are listening at the same time.

Nervous system

HIIT activates the sympathetic nervous system, your inner accelerator. Afterwards, the vagus nerve, your brake, has to take over again. HRV can show how well this switch works.

Hormonal system

Above a certain intensity, ACTH and cortisol rise. With a chronically strained axis, this additional impulse might shift the daily rhythm further.

Metabolism

Intense stimuli can strongly trigger the signals for new mitochondria and may improve insulin sensitivity. Moderate continuous training can also increase mitochondria.

Immune system

Muscle work releases messenger substances that communicate with the immune system. With exhaustion or after infections, too strong a stimulus might rather disturb the balance. Mechanistically plausible, human studies still limited.

Mechanistic review · Humans

Martin MacInnis and Martin Gibala from McMaster University summarized how intensity steers muscle adaptation. The signals for building new mitochondria depend strongly on intensity, yet moderate continuous training also increases mitochondrial content. For you, this means: there is more than one way to support your cellular power plants.

MacInnis MJ, Gibala MJ. J Physiol. 2017;595(9):2915-2930. DOI: 10.1113/JP273196
What is supported and what is not: Meta-analyses support the effects of HIIT and endurance training on oxygen uptake and insulin resistance. The intensity-dependent rise in cortisol is well documented. Mechanistically plausible, but not yet tested in large human studies, is the idea that an already overloaded stress axis responds less well to intense stimuli. This decision logic is my reasoned clinical interpretation, not a guideline.

And now you know why I never look at training in isolation, but always in interplay with sleep, stress and metabolism.

How can you tell whether your stress axis is stable?

Maybe you are now wondering: How am I supposed to know what state my system is in right now? Good news. Your body sends signals. You only need to learn to read them.

The most important measurement window is called heart rate variability. Imagine it as the swell of your heartbeat. A relaxed heart varies finely between beats. A stressed heart beats rigidly like a metronome.

RCT · Humans

A Finnish team led by Antti Kiviniemi divided 26 men into three groups. One group trained according to a fixed plan, another trained hard only when morning HRV was stable and trained easy or not at all when it fell below the personal reference value. Only the HRV-guided group increased its maximal oxygen uptake significantly, from 56 to 60 ml/kg/min.

Kiviniemi AM et al. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007;101(6):743-51. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-007-0552-2
Meta-analysis · Humans

Peter Düking and colleagues from the University of Würzburg analyzed 8 studies with 198 participants on HRV-guided training. The HRV groups mostly completed fewer intense sessions, improved submaximal values more and had fewer non-responders. Less intensity, applied in a targeted way, therefore does not appear to mean less progress.

Düking P et al. J Sci Med Sport. 2021;24(11):1180-1192. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2021.04.012
Controlled study · Humans

A Spanish group led by Alejandro Javaloyes compared HRV-guided training with block periodization in 20 trained cyclists over eight weeks. The HRV group improved several performance values, the block group mainly one, but in the direct group comparison the results were similar. The timing of training load therefore seems to play a role, though the effect is subtle rather than dramatic.

Javaloyes A et al. J Strength Cond Res. 2020;34(6):1511-1518. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003337

What matters is your personal trend. Daniel Plews and colleagues describe that, especially in very fit people, only longer-term observation reveals an individual "HRV fingerprint". A single morning value says little. The trend over a week says much more.

Self-check: How stable is your axis right now?

  • HRV: Is your weekly average within your own usual range, or has it been below it for several days?
  • Resting heart rate: Is it noticeably higher than usual in the morning?
  • Sleep: Do you fall asleep easily and wake up rested, even after intense days?
  • Mood: Do you look forward to exertion, or does it feel like an obligation?
  • Performance: Is it rising, staying stable or falling despite training?
Reframe

A calm day after a drop in HRV is not a step backwards. It is precise training. You set the stimulus when your body is also able to respond to it.

And now you know why I prefer working with your trend rather than with a ready-made weekly plan from the internet.

The KPNI decision logic: HIIT or endurance training based on resilience

Instead of either/or, I suggest a traffic light. It does not replace a medical assessment. But it can give you a direction.

1

Green: stable stress axis

HRV within your own normal range, good sleep, desire for exertion, stable performance. Here HIIT can be a valuable stimulus for the heart, mitochondria and insulin sensitivity. Plenty of calm endurance still makes sense as the foundation.

2

Yellow: strained axis

HRV below your usual range for a few days, more restless sleep, a lot of pressure in daily life. Here calm endurance may be the better choice. Intense sessions can be postponed until the signals are stable again.

3

Red: exhaustion

Persistent fatigue, declining performance, burnout symptoms or worsening after exertion. Here a medical assessment comes first. Movement remains possible, but gentle, dosed and without a performance goal.

Review · Humans

The Norwegian sports scientist Stephen Seiler analyzed the training habits of successful endurance athletes. About 80 percent of their sessions are in the low intensity range, and only about 20 percent are high intensity. So even elite athletes rely on a lot of calm and a few targeted peaks.

Seiler S. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010;5(3):276-91. DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.5.3.276
+83 %Cortisol rise after 30 min at 80 % of VO2max (Hill 2008)
80 / 20Ratio of calm to intense sessions in endurance athletes (Seiler 2010)
1.2ml/kg/min advantage of HIIT for VO2max (Milanović 2015)

And now you know why I answer the question "HIIT or endurance training" with a counter-question: How is your nervous system doing right now?

When training becomes a stressor: overtraining, burnout, Long Covid

Some people train harder the more exhausted they are. As if the body could be forced into shape with enough willpower.

Typical strain pattern

A common pattern looks like this: everyday stress rises, and training becomes more and more intense as an outlet. More pressure during the day, harder intervals in the evening.

At some point the system may tip over. Sleep becomes shallower, performance drops, and so does mood. The impulse is then often: train even more.

The lesson: if training feels like an escape, it may be worth looking at your stress axis before you increase intensity.

Consensus statement · ECSS and ACSM

The European and American sports medicine societies, with Romain Meeusen as lead author, published a joint consensus on overtraining. They describe a gradual transition from functional overreaching through non-functional overreaching to overtraining syndrome. So far, no single marker meets all criteria for a reliable diagnosis, which is why the overall picture counts.

Meeusen R et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(1):186-205. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318279a10a
Systematic review · Humans

A team from Radboud University led by Lea Naczenski analyzed ten studies on exercise and burnout. In intervention studies, they found strong indications that physical activity may reduce exhaustion, although only one study met high quality standards. Movement can therefore be a useful building block with burnout when the dose fits your state.

Naczenski LM et al. J Occup Health. 2017;59(6):477-494. DOI: 10.1539/joh.17-0050-RA

Long Covid has its own framework. Here it is not about training stimuli, but about post-exertional malaise, a delayed worsening after exertion.

Case-control study · Humans

An Amsterdam research group led by Brent Appelman and Rob Wüst examined muscle samples from people with Long Covid before and after provoked exertion. After exertion, metabolic disturbances and muscle abnormalities increased. For people with post-exertional malaise, this speaks against the motto "push through".

Appelman B et al. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):17. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-44432-3
A shift in perspective

With exhaustion, the goal is not to get fitter. The goal is to become resilient again. These are two different tasks, and they need different intensities.

And now you know why "more exercise" is not automatically the right recommendation when you are exhausted.

Sleep: the quiet referee of your training choice

Maybe you are wondering whether you can simply decide by feel. You can. And your sleep is one of the most honest advisors in that process.

Meta-analysis · Humans

A group at Boston University led by Alexandra Kredlow analyzed 66 studies on exercise and sleep. Regular exercise moderately improved sleep quality and slightly increased total sleep time, and intensity was not a significant factor. At the group level, what matters most is that you move. Individually, it is worth observing what your sleep tells you.

Kredlow MA et al. J Behav Med. 2015;38(3):427-49. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-015-9617-6

If you lie awake for a long time after a late HIIT session, that is a signal. Maybe the time of day does not suit you. Maybe the intensity does not suit you right now. You are free to adjust both.

For me, this is where the bigger gain lies. It is not about a few extra milliliters of oxygen uptake. It is about trusting your body again. Sensing when it wants to push and when it needs rest. This ability is a kind of freedom. It can stay with you far beyond any workout.

Three levers you can use starting tomorrow

  • Observe your mornings for one week. HRV if you use a device, otherwise resting heart rate, how you slept and your mood. This way you get to know your own normal range.
  • Make calm endurance your foundation. A pace at which you can still speak in full sentences. Add intense sessions on top as targeted peaks.
  • Let your signals help decide the intensity. If they are stable, it can get intense. If they have been dampened for days, choose the calm option on that day.
Key takeaway

HIIT and endurance training are not opponents. They are two tools. The art lies in choosing the right tool for the state you are in today.

Frequently asked questions about HIIT or endurance training

Is HIIT or endurance training better?

Neither form is better across the board. In a meta-analysis of 28 studies, both clearly improved maximal oxygen uptake, with HIIT ahead by only a small margin. What may matter most is how resilient your stress system is right now. With a stable stress axis, HIIT can be a strong stimulus. With exhaustion, calm endurance training may be the more suitable choice.

Does HIIT raise cortisol?

Yes, in the short term. In a controlled study, cortisol rose by about 40 percent after 30 minutes at 60 percent of maximal oxygen uptake and by about 83 percent at 80 percent. At 40 percent, a slight decrease was even seen after correction. In a healthy system, this rise is a normal training signal. In an axis that is already overloaded, it might add further strain.

What is Zone 2 training?

Zone 2 describes calm endurance training at a pace where you can still talk in full sentences. It roughly corresponds to the low intensity range in which, according to observational data, endurance athletes complete about 80 percent of their sessions. Moderate continuous training can also increase the mitochondrial content of muscle. The stress stimulus for the hormonal axis is considerably smaller.

How can I use HRV to guide my training?

In a randomized study, participants trained hard when their morning HRV was stable and trained easy or not at all when it fell clearly below their own reference value. This group improved its oxygen uptake significantly. A meta-analysis shows small benefits and fewer non-responders. What matters is your own trend over several days, not a single value or a comparison with other people.

How can I tell that HIIT is not doing me good right now?

Possible signs include poor sleep after intense sessions, an HRV that has dropped over several days, an elevated resting heart rate, irritability and declining performance despite training. According to the consensus of European and American sports medicine, there is no single marker that reliably indicates overtraining. That is why the overall picture from several signals may be more informative.

Can I exercise with burnout?

Movement can be a useful building block with burnout. A systematic review found strong evidence from intervention studies that physical activity may reduce the exhaustion component, although only one study was of high quality. With pronounced exhaustion, there are good reasons to start at a calm intensity and to consider intense stimuli only later.

What should I keep in mind with Long Covid and post-exertional malaise?

With post-exertional malaise, symptoms often worsen after exertion with a delay. A study in Nature Communications found an increase in muscle abnormalities and metabolic disturbances in people with Long Covid after provoked exertion. A different framework applies here than in sport: pacing instead of a training stimulus, with medical support. HIIT is generally not the right approach in this situation.

Does exercise improve sleep, and does intensity play a role?

A meta-analysis of 66 studies found that regular exercise may moderately improve sleep quality. In this analysis, intensity was not a significant factor. Individually, though, it can still make a difference when and how hard you train. If you sleep poorly after late intense sessions, that is a signal you can take seriously.

Is HIIT good for insulin sensitivity?

A meta-analysis of 50 studies found that HIIT may lower insulin resistance more than no exercise and slightly more than continuous training. In people with type 2 diabetes or at risk of it, fasting glucose fell compared with control. For metabolism, HIIT can therefore be an interesting stimulus, provided your stress axis can carry it.

More in the Sports Guide

Connections to other topics

About the author

Shukri Jarmoukli

Licensed physician with a focus on Integrative Medicine and Clinical Psychoneuroimmunology (KPNI). In his practice ViveCura in Berlin, he combines laboratory diagnostics, lifestyle medicine and training guidance into individual concepts.

ViveCura Berlin · Skalitzer Straße 137, Berlin

Sources

Clinical: RCT / meta-analysis Human observation / review Animal model Cell culture
  1. Milanović Z, Sporiš G, Weston M. Effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIT) and Continuous Endurance Training for VO2max Improvements: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials. Sports Med. 2015;45(10):1469-81. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-015-0365-0 [Meta-analysis, 28 studies, n=723]
  2. Jelleyman C, Yates T, O'Donovan G et al. The effects of high-intensity interval training on glucose regulation and insulin resistance: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015;16(11):942-61. DOI: 10.1111/obr.12317 [Meta-analysis, 50 studies]
  3. Hill EE, Zack E, Battaglini C, Viru M, Viru A, Hackney AC. Exercise and circulating cortisol levels: the intensity threshold effect. J Endocrinol Invest. 2008;31(7):587-91. DOI: 10.1007/BF03345606 [RCT, randomized order, n=12]
  4. Peake JM, Tan SJ, Markworth JF et al. Metabolic and hormonal responses to isoenergetic high-intensity interval exercise and continuous moderate-intensity exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014;307(7):E539-52. DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00276.2014 [RCT, crossover, n=10]
  5. MacInnis MJ, Gibala MJ. Physiological adaptations to interval training and the role of exercise intensity. J Physiol. 2017;595(9):2915-2930. DOI: 10.1113/JP273196 [Mechanistic review]
  6. Kiviniemi AM, Hautala AJ, Kinnunen H, Tulppo MP. Endurance training guided individually by daily heart rate variability measurements. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007;101(6):743-51. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-007-0552-2 [RCT, n=26]
  7. Düking P, Zinner C, Trabelsi K et al. Monitoring and adapting endurance training on the basis of heart rate variability monitored by wearable technologies: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2021;24(11):1180-1192. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2021.04.012 [Meta-analysis, 8 studies, n=198]
  8. Javaloyes A, Sarabia JM, Lamberts RP, Plews D, Moya-Ramon M. Training Prescription Guided by Heart Rate Variability Vs. Block Periodization in Well-Trained Cyclists. J Strength Cond Res. 2020;34(6):1511-1518. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003337 [Controlled intervention study, n=20]
  9. Plews DJ, Laursen PB, Stanley J, Kilding AE, Buchheit M. Training adaptation and heart rate variability in elite endurance athletes: opening the door to effective monitoring. Sports Med. 2013;43(9):773-81. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-013-0071-8 [Review]
  10. Seiler S. What is best practice for training intensity and duration distribution in endurance athletes? Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010;5(3):276-91. DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.5.3.276 [Review]
  11. Meeusen R, Duclos M, Foster C et al. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the overtraining syndrome: joint consensus statement of the European College of Sport Science and the American College of Sports Medicine. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(1):186-205. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318279a10a [Review, consensus statement ECSS and ACSM]
  12. Naczenski LM, de Vries JD, van Hooff MLM, Kompier MAJ. Systematic review of the association between physical activity and burnout. J Occup Health. 2017;59(6):477-494. DOI: 10.1539/joh.17-0050-RA [Systematic review, 10 studies]
  13. Appelman B, Charlton BT, Goulding RP et al. Muscle abnormalities worsen after post-exertional malaise in long COVID. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):17. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-44432-3 [Case-control, longitudinal]
  14. Kredlow MA, Capozzoli MC, Hearon BA, Calkins AW, Otto MW. The effects of physical activity on sleep: a meta-analytic review. J Behav Med. 2015;38(3):427-49. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-015-9617-6 [Meta-analysis, 66 studies]

This article is for information purposes only and does not replace a medical examination. The decision logic presented is a clinical interpretation based on the cited studies and not a guideline recommendation.

Have questions or want to book an appointment?

We'd be happy to advise you personally at our practice.

Book appointment