Walking Barefoot: What Direct Ground Contact Can Do for Your Feet and Posture
Biomechanics instead of the electron hypothesis. How your foot muscles, the soles of your feet and your gait can respond to less shoe, and when the ground becomes a strain.
From an early age, we wrap our feet in cushioning and support. That is comfortable, and sometimes it is necessary. But a foot is not a parcel. It is a sensory organ with its own muscles, and muscles want to work.
Do you remember the first day of a holiday by the sea? You walk barefoot through the sand. In the evening, you feel muscles in your feet and calves that you never knew you had.
Maybe you also know the other extreme. You eagerly bought barefoot shoes and ran your usual loop on the very first weekend. By Monday, you could barely put your foot down.
Both experiences tell the same story. Your foot can do more than you give it credit for. And it needs time to learn it again.
This article is about muscles, nerves, bones and tendons. In other words, about what can be measured. And about the question: for whom is direct ground contact a good stimulus, and for whom is it not?
When the topic is going barefoot, the word grounding comes up quickly. It refers to the idea that electrons from the Earth flow into the body through bare skin and might dampen inflammation there.
The studies on this are so far small and methodologically limited. I have assessed them one by one in a separate article on grounding and earthing. Here, I deliberately set this hypothesis aside. For your feet, there is an explanation that works without it: biomechanics.
What to expect in this article
- Why your foot is a power plant in its own right
- What less shoe does to your foot muscles
- How the soles of your feet help steer balance and posture
- What forefoot and heel mean for your knee
- Barefoot, flat or stable with knee osteoarthritis
- What children's feet need
- Why switching too fast is risky
- When you are better off not going barefoot
- The four KPNI lenses on the bare foot
- Three levers for your everyday life
Your foot: not a shock absorber, but a power plant
When did you last consciously feel what you are walking on? For most of us, the foot is a body part that is simply supposed to work. Until it hurts.
Yet inside every foot is an astonishing piece of architecture: 26 bones, many joints, ligaments, tendons and two groups of muscles.
Imagine the longitudinal arch as an arched bridge. The bones are the stones. The muscles are tension cables that readjust with every step. They let the arch give a little when your foot lands and tighten it again when you push off.
The large muscles for this sit in the lower leg and reach into the foot via long tendons. The small ones, the so-called intrinsic foot muscles, lie within the foot itself. They are inconspicuous. But they keep the arch finely balanced.
In the British Journal of Sports Medicine, McKeon and colleagues from the USA described the foot as a core system of its own. They compare the small foot muscles to the deep stabilizers of the trunk.
The authors criticize that foot problems are more often supported from the outside instead of training these muscles in the way they are built.
What this means for you: Your foot has its own stability system. It might become weaker if it is rarely challenged, and it can be trained.
McKeon PO, Hertel J, Bramble D, Davis I. Br J Sports Med. 2015. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092690A foot arch is not a rigid component that you prop up from below. It is more like an arch with living tension cables.
An insole or a supportive shoe can make sense in individual cases. It does not train the tension cables. Only movement can do that.
And now you know why a foot is more than a shock absorber. It is an active system, and active systems respond to training.
What less shoe does to your foot muscles
Try picking up a towel from the floor with your toes. Or lifting only your big toe while the others stay on the ground. For many adults, this is surprisingly hard.
That is no reason to worry. It rather shows how little we challenge these muscles in everyday life. A sturdy, well-cushioned shoe does a lot of their work for them. The question is: what happens when we give some of that work back?
Key point: Less shoe can measurably strengthen your foot muscles. Randomized studies show this, but the overall evidence is still thin.
Ridge and colleagues from Brigham Young University randomly assigned 57 runners to three groups. One group walked more and more in minimalist shoes in everyday life, one did strengthening exercises for the feet, and one remained a control group.
After eight weeks, all measured foot muscles in both intervention groups were larger and stronger, some of them already after four weeks. In the control group, nothing changed.
What this means for you: Walking in minimalist shoes was about as effective here as an exercise program. The number of steps in the new shoes was increased slowly, week by week.
Ridge ST, Olsen MT, Bruening DA et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001751Curtis and colleagues from the University of Liverpool had adults wear minimalist shoes in everyday life for six months. For comparison, they examined a group with an average of 2.5 years of experience in such shoes.
After six months, foot strength had risen by an average of 57.4 percent. At the end, the experienced group had similar foot strength to the intervention group.
What this means for you: A large part of the adaptation might happen in the first months. Without random group assignment, however, this remains an observation, not proof.
Curtis R, Willems C, Paoletti P, D'Août K. Sci Rep. 2021. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98070-0A systematic review by Xu and colleagues summarized nine controlled studies. Depending on the study, foot muscle strength rose by 9 to 57 percent and muscle size by 7.05 to 10.6 percent. That sounds impressive. How robust it is only becomes clear under the strictest look at the data.
Peters-Dickie and colleagues from Louvain and Leuven analyzed 28 randomized studies with 1,399 participants on foot exercises and minimalist shoes.
Minimalist shoes were associated with more strength in toes two to five. Foot exercises were associated with less drop of the longitudinal arch during running. For muscle size, the results were contradictory, and the authors rated the certainty of the evidence as low to very low.
What this means for you: The direction looks right, but large, clean studies are still missing. An honest training stimulus, not a magic bullet.
Peters-Dickie JL, Detrembleur C, Guallar-Bouloc M et al. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106417Do regular shoes make feet weak?
It is not quite that simple. But a comparison of two populations offers a clue.
Holowka, Wallace and Lieberman from Harvard University compared men from northwestern Mexico, who traditionally wear only minimal footwear, with men from the USA in conventional shoes.
The men with minimal footwear had higher and stiffer longitudinal arches during walking and larger foot muscles. The larger the big toe abductor muscle, the stiffer the arch.
What this means for you: Here, modern shoes go hand in hand with weaker foot muscles. Whether they are the cause, a comparison like this cannot prove, because the groups differ in many ways.
Holowka NB, Wallace IJ, Lieberman DE. Sci Rep. 2018. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-21916-7A minimalist shoe is not a magic bullet. It is a piece of training equipment.
And as with any training equipment, the dose decides. Too little does nothing, too much at once overwhelms. In between lies the range in which your foot can grow stronger.
And now you know why less shoe can mean more muscle. Not overnight, but over weeks and months.
Posture begins in the soles of your feet
Stand on one leg for a moment and close your eyes. Can you feel your foot working? Your toes press down, the arch gives and tightens again, the pressure under your sole shifts.
What you are feeling is proprioception. That is the name for the body's ability to sense its own position and movement. It is like an internal position sensor that constantly sends data to the spinal cord and brain.
Posture is therefore not a state you adopt once. It is an ongoing balancing act. And an important part of the data for it comes from below.
Key point: The sole of your foot is a sensory organ for balance. Cushioning protects, but it can take away part of that information.
Kennedy and Inglis used fine electrodes on the tibial nerve of 13 healthy people to record the signals of individual skin receptors in the sole of the foot. The receptors were distributed across the entire sole and behaved differently from those of the hand. The authors see this as an indication of their role in standing and in controlling movement.
A review by Viseux summarizes what happens when this information fades. With age and with nerve damage, for example from diabetes or chemotherapy, the sensitivity of the sole decreases. This often goes along with poorer postural control and more falls.
For a paper in Nature, Holowka and colleagues studied people in Kenya and the USA who often walk barefoot and compared them with people who mostly wear shoes.
Those who walked barefoot a lot had thicker and harder calluses. Unlike shoes, this protective layer did not come at the expense of tactile sensitivity, and it did not change the impact forces during walking.
What this means for you: A callus is a sole that can feel. Cushioned shoes protect and make walking comfortable, but according to the authors, at the expense of tactile sensitivity.
Holowka NB, Wynands B, Drechsel TJ et al. Nature. 2019. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1345-6Your gait changes without shoes, too. A systematic review by Franklin and colleagues found: barefoot, steps become shorter and quicker, the foot lands flatter, and the forefoot spreads under load. People who habitually walk barefoot had lower peak pressures under the sole. Those who are used to shoes and suddenly walk barefoot, on the other hand, had higher ones.
This last point matters. A foot that has been cushioned for years does not immediately distribute pressure as well as a foot that is used to going without. Adaptation takes time.
Even a thin sole can make a difference. Wallace and colleagues studied Tarahumara, Indigenous farmers from Mexico who traditionally wear simple sandals, and people from the USA. In both groups, people stepped more gently barefoot than in minimal sandals.
And what does this mean as you get older?
Over the years, every step becomes a little more of a calculation. And a fall can change an entire chapter of your life.
Mickle and colleagues from Wollongong examined the feet of 312 people between 60 and 90 years of age and followed them for one year.
During this time, 35 percent of them fell. Those who fell had, on average, less strength in the big toe, 11.6 versus 14.8 percent of body weight, and less strength in the other toes.
What this means for you: Toe strength is not a minor detail. It is one of the factors linked to fall risk in older age.
Mickle KJ, Munro BJ, Lord SR, Menz HB, Steele JR. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.08.011Koepsell and colleagues in the USA observed 1,371 people aged 65 and over for two years. They compared 327 people after a fall with 327 matched controls.
Barefoot or in socks, the risk of falling was markedly increased, with an odds ratio of 11.2. The confidence interval, at 2.4 to 51.8, was very wide. Athletic shoes were associated with the lowest risk.
What this means for you: For older people, walking barefoot in everyday life is not a harmless fitness program. Smooth floors, slippery socks and a sense of balance that can decline with age are a risky combination.
Koepsell TD, Wolf ME, Buchner DM et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52412.xIn a study published in the BMJ, Spink and colleagues from Melbourne randomly assigned 305 older people with disabling foot pain and an increased risk of falling to two groups.
One group received insoles, footwear advice, a subsidy for shoes, foot and ankle exercises for home and information on fall prevention. Over one year, this group fell 36 percent less often than the group receiving usual podiatry care. The proportion of people who fell, however, did not differ significantly.
What this means for you: Strong feet and suitable shoes belong together. Which component contributed how much cannot be separated in this study.
Spink MJ, Menz HB, Fotoohabadi MR et al. BMJ. 2011. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d3411For older people, the message is not: shoes off. It is: make your feet strong, practice barefoot on safe ground with something to hold on to, and wear well-fitting, non-slip shoes in everyday life.
Whether walking barefoot changes the posture of the spine or back pain has barely been studied. I am not making you any promises about that. What the data do show: balance is a team effort between the soles of your feet, your muscles and your brain.
And now you know why posture also begins where you touch the ground.
From foot to knee: what happens one floor down
The knee that wanted to give way on the stairs
I know this pattern very well. A middle-aged man who sits a lot for work and likes to run on weekends. For a few months, his knee had been giving him trouble.
The knee itself had been thoroughly examined, without any clear damage. When he stood on one leg, something else caught the eye. His longitudinal arch sank noticeably, his knee drifted inward, and his toes could barely build up pressure against the floor.
We did not ignore the knee. But we turned our attention one floor down: short exercises for the foot muscles in everyday life, barefoot at home, still his usual shoes outdoors, and a temporary reduction in his running volume.
After a few months, he told me the stairs felt predictable again. His knee felt “more guided”, he said.
Why might the foot have a say in the knee? Imagine a chain of links. When the lowest link gives way, the position of every link above it changes. If the arch tips strongly inward under load, the shin can rotate along with it, and the knee ends up in a different position. This is biomechanically plausible. Whether it plays a role in an individual case needs a careful look.
Mølgaard and colleagues from Aalborg studied 40 adults with pain behind the kneecap whose heel tilted noticeably inward when standing.
One group did only knee-focused exercises, the other additionally did foot exercises and received insoles. After four months, the pain score in the foot group had improved by 8.9 points more. After twelve months, the difference was no longer significant.
What this means for you: With some kinds of knee pain, the foot can be part of the plan. The study was small, and the contributions of exercises and insoles cannot be separated.
Mølgaard CM, Rathleff MS, Andreasen J et al. J Sci Med Sport. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.05.019And when running: heel or forefoot?
When you start jogging barefoot, something fundamental changes. Without a cushioned heel, landing on your heel feels hard. Your body looks for a different way.
Lieberman and colleagues from Harvard University published a study in Nature with runners who habitually run either barefoot or in shoes.
Habitual barefoot runners often landed on the forefoot, runners in shoes mostly on the heel. Even on hard surfaces, the barefoot forefoot strikers generated smaller impact forces than heel strikers in shoes.
What this means for you: The foot can cushion the impact itself when it lands differently. Whether this prevents injuries was not examined in this study.
Lieberman DE, Venkadesan M, Werbel WA et al. Nature. 2010. DOI: 10.1038/nature08723Kulmala and colleagues from Finland compared 19 female runners with a natural forefoot strike with 19 female heel strikers.
The forefoot strikers had lower forces in the kneecap joint, 4.3 versus 5.1 times body weight. In return, the forces on the Achilles tendon were higher, 6.3 versus 5.1 times body weight.
What this means for you: A forefoot strike can take load off the knee and instead demand more from the calf and Achilles tendon. The load does not disappear. It moves.
Kulmala JP, Avela J, Pasanen K, Parkkari J. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31829efcf7Anderson and colleagues from La Trobe University analyzed 53 studies on foot strike during running.
Forefoot and midfoot running were associated with lower loading rates and less pressure in the kneecap joint, but with more load on the ankle and calf. Only retrospective data showed fewer injuries. Prospective comparisons were missing, and running economy did not improve.
What this means for you: The authors do not advise healthy heel strikers to switch. So do not change something that does not hurt just because it happens to be trendy.
Anderson LM, Bonanno DR, Hart HF, Barton CJ. Sports Med. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-019-01238-yThere is no single right foot strike for everyone. There is a shift in load: away from the knee, toward the calf, Achilles tendon and midfoot.
Whether that makes sense for you depends on which structure in your body needs protection right now and which one tolerates load well.
And now you know why the foot can have a say in the knee. And why a new running style is no shortcut.
Knee osteoarthritis: barefoot, flat or stable?
When the knee already shows wear and tear, the question of shoes suddenly becomes very concrete. Every step counts. And every piece of advice sounds different.
Biomechanics offers a first direction. Shakoor and Block analyzed the gait of 75 people with knee osteoarthritis, once in their everyday shoes and once barefoot. Barefoot, the peak loads on the hip and knee dropped. The torque that loads the inner side of the knee was 11.9 percent lower.
A Brazilian research group led by Trombini-Souza randomly assigned 56 older women with osteoarthritis on the inner side of the knee to two groups. One group wore an inexpensive minimalist shoe for at least six hours a day for six months. In this group, pain and function improved, and a measure of load on the inner side of the knee fell by 21.8 percent.
In the Annals of Internal Medicine, Paterson and colleagues from Melbourne tested whether flat, flexible shoes perform better than stable, supportive ones in knee osteoarthritis. For six months, 164 people wore one of the two models for at least six hours a day.
Contrary to the team's expectations, the stable shoes improved walking pain more. Adverse events occurred more often with flat shoes, at 32 versus 15 percent.
What this means for you: Less joint load in the lab does not automatically mean less pain in everyday life. With osteoarthritis, choosing shoes calls for an individual weighing of pros and cons.
Paterson KL, Bennell KL, Campbell PK et al. Ann Intern Med. 2021. DOI: 10.7326/M20-6321What speaks for it: Barefoot and in flat shoes, the load on the inner side of the knee drops. A smaller randomized study found less pain with minimalist shoes.
What speaks against it: In the largest randomized study, stable shoes did better for pain and were less often associated with complaints.
My conclusion: With knee osteoarthritis, there is no shoe that fits everyone. Try, observe and, when in doubt, decide with support from a physician or physiotherapist.
And now you know why there should be no shoe dogma when it comes to knee osteoarthritis.
Children's feet: shoes as protection, not as a corset
Have you ever watched a toddler learning to walk? The toes spread, grip and feel their way across the floor. Every step is a small experiment.
Children's feet are still under construction. The arches, the muscles and their interplay with balance develop over years. What happens during this time might shape the foot for later life.
Key point: In studies, children who spend a lot of time barefoot more often show higher foot arches and, in some cases, better balance. Most of this is observational data.
In India, Rao and Joseph analyzed the footprints of 2,300 children between 4 and 13 years of age.
Of the children who wore shoes, 8.6 percent had flat feet, compared with 2.8 percent of the children without shoes. Flat feet were most common with closed shoes, less common with sandals and slippers.
What this means for you: Early, constant wearing of closed shoes went along with flatter feet. An observation, but one that fits with later studies.
Rao UB, Joseph B. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.74B4.1624509Later data point in the same direction. In a multicenter study, Hollander and colleagues from Hamburg, Jena and Stellenbosch compared children and adolescents growing up barefoot with matched peers who habitually wear shoes. In all age groups, wearing shoes was associated with a lower foot arch and differences in the position of the big toe.
Zech and colleagues studied 810 children and adolescents from South Africa and Germany, 385 of whom were growing up barefoot. Children aged 6 to 10 who grew up barefoot performed better in balance and in the standing long jump. Children who wore shoes, however, sprinted faster.
Quinlan and colleagues from Sydney had 70 children between 9 and 12 years of age wear either standard shoes or moderate minimalist shoes at school for nine months. The assignment was random.
In the minimalist shoe group, dynamic balance improved markedly. Foot muscles and toe strength increased moderately, but not to a statistically significant degree.
What this means for you: Even a more flexible school shoe might support balance. In this study, it was not clearly enough for more muscle mass.
Quinlan S, Sinclair P, Hunt A, Fong Yan A. Gait Posture. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.12.009A follow-up study by the same research group used genuine minimalist shoes as regular school shoes over two school terms. Of 30 children, 17 completed the study. Compared with the control group, their foot muscles became larger and stronger, and their arches became higher. Without random assignment and with many dropouts, this is a clue, not proof.
Above all, a child's shoe needs to protect: from broken glass, cold and injuries. It does not need to do the walking itself.
Barefoot time at home, in the garden or on the beach is a simple movement stimulus for healthy children. For outdoors, they need a shoe that bends easily and gives the toes room.
A child's foot that looks flat is not automatically a problem, because the arch is still developing. If there is pain, limping, clear differences between the left and right side, or if your child tires unusually quickly, the foot belongs in the hands of a specialist.
And now you know why barefoot time is more than a nostalgic feeling for children's feet.
Too fast, too much: when the ground becomes a strain
Enthusiasm makes a poor coach. You read about strong feet, buy barefoot shoes and want to get going right away. This is exactly where most problems start.
Key point: In studies, muscles respond within weeks. In the same period, bones and tendons already show signs of overload in some people.
Ridge and colleagues examined 36 experienced recreational runners with MRI before and after ten weeks. Of these, 19 gradually switched to five-toe shoes, while 17 kept running in their usual shoes.
In the transition group, 10 of 19 participants showed an increase in bone marrow edema in at least one foot bone, markedly more than in the control group. Such edema is considered a sign of additional stress, and in its most severe grade, a stress fracture.
What this means for you: Even a planned, gradual transition over ten weeks was too fast for many. The authors advise a very slow transition.
Ridge ST, Johnson AW, Mitchell UH et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182874769A case series from Boston described ten experienced runners who were injured on average 2.8 months after switching to minimalist shoes. Eight had stress fractures of the metatarsal bones, one of the heel bone, and one a tear of the plantar fascia. All of them recovered and returned to their previous running level.
Ryan and colleagues from Australia and Canada randomly assigned 103 recreational runners to a cushioned neutral shoe, a partially minimalist shoe or a fully minimalist shoe. All of them trained for a ten-kilometer race for twelve weeks.
Of 23 injuries, 4 occurred in the neutral shoe and 12 in the partially minimalist shoe. The group in the fully minimalist shoe reported more shin and calf pain.
What this means for you: If you are new to minimalist shoes and training toward a race goal at the same time, you are asking your body for two adaptations at once.
Ryan M, Elashi M, Newsham-West R, Taunton J. Br J Sports Med. 2014. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-092061Fuller and colleagues from Adelaide followed 61 trained heel strikers over 26 weeks. They were randomly switched to minimalist or conventional shoes and slowly increased their running time in them.
In minimalist shoes, pain was greater, clearly noticeable above 35 kilometers per week. The injury risk rose with body weight: from 71.4 kilograms, an injury in the minimalist shoe became more likely, and at 85.7 kilograms the risk was about twice as high.
What this means for you: Heavier runners and high weekly mileage call for particular patience when switching.
Fuller JT, Thewlis D, Buckley JD et al. Am J Sports Med. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/0363546516682497Sánchez-Del Río and colleagues from Spain summarized twelve studies on switching to minimalist shoes, seven of them with 313 participants in a meta-analysis.
The switch was associated with a moderately increased risk of injury. The most common problems were bone marrow edema in the midfoot, Achilles tendon complaints and calf pain, linked to the change to a forefoot strike.
What this means for you: The authors see supervised transition programs of at least twelve weeks as a possible way to lower the risk.
Sánchez-Del Río E, Galán-Arriero I, Palomo-Fernández I et al. Gait Posture. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110614It is interesting to look at people who have gone barefoot all their lives. A systematic review by Hollander and colleagues with 15 studies and 8,399 participants found no different injury rates in them compared with people who wear shoes. They had wider feet and fewer foot deformities, but more foot complaints of other kinds. The authors rate the evidence as limited to very limited.
So a foot that has lived barefoot since childhood is something different from a foot that is suddenly expected to do everything at once after decades in shoes.
How long should the transition take?
A set duration cannot be derived from the studies. Muscles responded after four to eight weeks, while in a similar period, bones in many people still showed signs of overload. A 2026 meta-analysis names supervised programs of at least twelve weeks as a possible framework. If you want to run in minimalist shoes, think in months rather than weeks.
Warning signs that mean you should pause and get checked
- Pain in the midfoot that increases under load
- Pinpoint tenderness on a metatarsal bone
- Swelling on the top of the foot
- Calf or shin pain that lasts for several days
- Morning pain in the heel or Achilles tendon
- Pain that makes you limp
If you only listen to your muscles, you will outpace your skeleton.
Muscle soreness speaks up loudly and early. Bones and tendons often only speak up once they are already overloaded. Building up slowly is therefore not a sign of weakness, but of wisdom.
And now you know why the ground is not an opponent, but also no place for impatience.
When you are better off not going barefoot
For some people, the foot is not a piece of training equipment, but a sensitive organ that needs protection. That is not weakness. It is self-care.
If you have diabetes, especially with reduced sensation in your feet or with circulatory problems, please do not go barefoot, not even at home, unless you have discussed it with your doctor.
With neuropathy, you often do not notice small injuries, blisters or pressure spots. These can turn into ulcers that close only slowly and can become infected. Have your feet checked regularly and look at them yourself every day.
The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot has updated its guideline on preventing diabetic foot ulcers based on a systematic review of the literature.
It recommends instructing people at risk in foot care and advising them not to walk without suitable foot protection. People with diabetes should be screened regularly for loss of sensation and peripheral artery disease. For low to moderate risk, foot and ankle exercise, ideally supervised, can be considered, and an increase of 1,000 steps per day is considered probably safe.
What this means for you: Even with diabetes, movement can be worthwhile for your feet, ideally coordinated with your care team. Unprotected ground contact, however, is too risky for feet at risk.
Bus SA, Sacco ICN, Monteiro-Soares M et al. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3651Other situations where caution makes sense
Circulatory problems (PAD)
When blood flow to the legs is poor, small wounds close more slowly, and germs have an easier time.
Nerve damage from other causes
Sensation in the sole of the foot can also decrease after chemotherapy or with other neuropathies.
Open wounds and skin infections
As long as the skin on the sole of your foot is not intact, it should be protected.
Previous stress fractures or osteoporosis
If your bones have already reacted to load in the past, any transition should be especially gentle and supervised.
Acute problems in the Achilles tendon or sole
A forefoot strike places greater demands on the calf and Achilles tendon. With acute complaints, this is the wrong moment.
Older age with a risk of falling
Practicing barefoot, yes, on safe ground and with something to hold on to. In everyday life, non-slip shoes protect better than socks.
With rheumatic diseases, marked foot deformities or after foot surgery, your capacity to handle load should also be assessed by a professional beforehand.
And now you know why the same natural force can be training for one person and a risk for another.
The four KPNI lenses on the bare foot
In clinical psychoneuroimmunology, we look at four systems together: the nervous system, immune system, metabolism and hormonal system. Through this lens, walking barefoot falls into place surprisingly clearly.
Nervous system
The receptors in the sole of the foot report pressure, stretch and unevenness to the spinal cord and brain. These signals feed into the control loops for balance and posture. Cushioned shoes protect, but they can cost tactile sensitivity. It is well documented that declining sensitivity in the sole goes along with poorer postural control.
Immune system
The skin on the sole of the foot is a barrier. Calluses can protect it without dulling sensation. With neuropathy or poor circulation, every unnoticed injury becomes an entry point for germs. And an overloaded bone can react with edema, a stress response in the tissue.
Metabolism
Muscles are metabolic organs, including the small ones in the foot. Strong feet might make walking easier, and more walking can support glucose metabolism. At the same time, diabetic neuropathy is a metabolic consequence that makes the foot vulnerable. Movement, yes. Unprotected ground contact when you are at risk, no.
Hormonal system
Bone is constantly being remodeled, regulated among other things by estrogen, parathyroid hormone and vitamin D. With low estrogen after menopause or with vitamin D deficiency, bone might react more sensitively to new loads. This is physiologically plausible, but it has not been studied directly for barefoot walking itself.
Well documented or plausible
- Minimalist shoes and foot exercises can increase foot strength
- Barefoot, stride length, foot strike and pressure distribution change
- A forefoot strike can take load off the knee and place more demand on the Achilles tendon
- Switching too fast goes along with overload in the midfoot
- More flexible school shoes can support children's balance
- Weak toes go along with more falls in older age
Open or contradictory
- Whether barefoot running prevents running injuries in the long term
- Whether it changes spinal posture or back pain
- Which shoes are best for knee osteoarthritis
- Whether flat feet in adults can be reversed
- Electrons from the ground as a health factor
The ground is not a medicine. It is a training partner that tells your feet something new every day. Whether this training strengthens you or overwhelms you depends on the dose.
That is what this topic is about for me. Not a new shoe model. But feet that can still carry you safely down a flight of stairs at 80. Feet that walk across a meadow without you having to think about every step. Strong, alert feet are freedom of movement. And freedom of movement is quality of life.
And now you know why, when it comes to walking barefoot, I look above all at muscles, nerves and dose.
Three levers for your everyday life
If you now feel like trusting your feet with more: good. Here are three directions you can try without much effort. Provided, of course, that you do not belong to the groups for whom I advise caution above.
Start at home, not on asphalt
Walk barefoot at home, in the garden or on a lawn, at first for a few minutes a day. Varied ground such as grass, sand or forest floor can give the soles of your feet more information than a smooth floor. Build up over weeks, not days.
Train your feet in a targeted way
Spread your toes, lift your big toe on its own, actively raise your arch without curling your toes, stand on one leg. Exercises like these fit into everyday life, for example while brushing your teeth. In a randomized study, foot exercises increased foot strength about as much as minimalist shoes.
Build up slowly and keep your running style for now
If you want to run in minimalist shoes, start with walking, then with very short running distances. Do not force a forefoot strike. With a higher body weight or high weekly mileage, double patience applies, and a supervised transition over at least twelve weeks can be a sensible framework.
Barefoot is not a goal. It is a tool. Sometimes the best step for your feet is a good shoe, and sometimes it is the step out of it.
With persistent foot, knee or back pain, a thorough examination is worthwhile before any major change. Walking barefoot can be a nice building block. It does not replace a diagnostic workup.
Frequently asked questions about walking barefoot
Is walking barefoot healthy?
For healthy feet, walking barefoot can be a worthwhile training stimulus if you build up slowly. In randomized studies, walking in minimalist shoes made the small foot muscles larger and stronger.
A meta-analysis of 28 randomized studies confirms a gain in strength, but rates the certainty of the evidence as low to very low. When people switch too quickly, studies show overload in the midfoot, calf and Achilles tendon. If you have diabetes with reduced sensation, circulatory problems or open wounds, you should not walk barefoot.
How do I start walking barefoot without getting injured?
The safest way to start is at home and on soft ground, with a few minutes a day. First increase the time you spend walking, and only much later the distance you run.
In one study, 10 of 19 participants showed new bone marrow edema in the foot after a gradual ten-week switch to five-toe shoes. A 2026 meta-analysis names supervised transition programs of at least twelve weeks as a possible framework. Targeted foot exercises can accompany the transition, and pain that increases under load is a reason to take a break.
How long does it take to switch to barefoot shoes?
There is no set duration, because muscles and bones adapt at different speeds. In a randomized study, some foot muscles were measurably larger after just four weeks, and all measured muscles after eight weeks.
Over six months of observation, foot strength rose by an average of 57.4 percent. People with around 2.5 years of experience had similar foot strength to the group after six months. For bones and tendons, the studies on overload argue for more patience, so plan for months rather than weeks.
Are barefoot shoes just as good as going barefoot?
Not quite, because even a thin sole changes the way you step. Tarahumara from Mexico, who traditionally wear sandals, and people from the USA stepped more gently barefoot than in minimal sandals.
In the sandals, impact peaks were higher and impact impulses were larger. For everyday life, minimalist shoes are still a good compromise. They protect against broken glass, cold and dirt and let your foot do its work. In a randomized study, simply walking in minimalist shoes increased foot strength.
Can walking barefoot influence knee pain?
It is possible, but not with every form of knee pain and not automatically. In a randomized study with 40 people with pain behind the kneecap, symptoms improved more when foot exercises and insoles were added to knee exercises.
The advantage was measurable after four months, but no longer significant after twelve months. When running, a forefoot strike can take load off the knee joint, but it puts more strain on the calf and Achilles tendon. Have the cause of knee pain checked before you fundamentally change your footwear or running style.
Are flat, flexible shoes better for knee osteoarthritis?
The evidence is contradictory. In a gait analysis of 75 people with knee osteoarthritis, walking barefoot lowered the torque on the inner side of the knee by 11.9 percent. In a study with 56 older women, minimalist shoes were associated with less pain.
In the largest randomized study with 164 participants, however, stable, supportive shoes improved walking pain more than flat, flexible ones. Adverse events occurred more often with flat shoes, at 32 versus 15 percent. With knee osteoarthritis, choosing shoes therefore calls for an individual weighing of pros and cons.
Can walking barefoot change flat feet?
There are indications for children, but good data for adults are lacking. In an Indian survey of 2,300 children, 8.6 percent of the children who wore shoes had flat feet, but only 2.8 percent of the children without shoes.
In a controlled study, arch height increased in schoolchildren who wore genuine minimalist shoes. Men who traditionally wear hardly any shoes had higher and stiffer longitudinal arches than men in conventional shoes. Whether walking barefoot can reverse an existing flat foot in adults has not been shown.
Should children go barefoot as much as possible?
For healthy children, a lot speaks in favor of regular barefoot time. In a study with 810 children and adolescents from South Africa and Germany, children aged 6 to 10 who grew up barefoot performed better in balance and the standing long jump, while children who wore shoes sprinted faster.
In a randomized study with 70 schoolchildren, moderate minimalist shoes improved balance over nine months. For outdoors, a shoe that protects, leaves room for the toes and bends easily remains a sensible choice. If there is pain or limping, a child's foot belongs in the hands of a specialist.
Can I walk barefoot if I have diabetes?
With diabetes, you should not walk barefoot until your feet have been examined by a doctor. If you have reduced sensation or circulatory problems, you should avoid it as a rule.
The 2023 international IWGDF guideline recommends advising people at risk not to walk without suitable foot protection. With neuropathy, you often do not notice small injuries, and these can turn into ulcers. According to the guideline, foot and ankle exercise, ideally supervised, can be considered for people at low to moderate risk. Training, yes. Unprotected ground contact, no.
Is walking barefoot a good idea for older people?
Strong feet are valuable in older age, but walking barefoot in everyday life is not necessarily safe. In a study with 312 people aged 60 to 90, those whose toes had less strength fell more often.
In a case-control study with people aged 65 and over, the risk of falling was markedly higher barefoot or in socks, with considerable statistical uncertainty. Athletic shoes were associated with the lowest risk in that study. A combination makes sense: train your feet in a targeted way, practice barefoot on safe ground with something to hold on to, and wear well-fitting, non-slip shoes in everyday life.
Forefoot or heel: which running style is better?
Neither is better for everyone. The difference lies in how the load is distributed. Habitual barefoot runners often land on the forefoot and generate smaller impact forces than heel strikers in cushioned shoes.
In one study, female forefoot strikers had lower forces in the kneecap joint, but higher forces on the Achilles tendon. A meta-analysis of 53 studies found no advantage for running economy and advises healthy heel strikers against switching. Prospective data on whether a running style prevents injuries are still lacking.
Which warning signs should I take seriously when switching?
Above all, take pain seriously if it increases under load and does not subside overnight. Pinpoint tenderness on a metatarsal bone can point to a stress reaction in the bone.
In a case series, ten experienced runners were injured on average 2.8 months after switching to minimalist shoes, eight of them with stress fractures of the metatarsal bones. Persistent calf or shin pain and Achilles tendon problems are also typical signs of overload. In that case: reduce your volume and have it checked by a doctor.
What does walking barefoot have to do with grounding?
Less than is often claimed. Grounding describes the hypothesis that electrons from the Earth enter the body through bare skin and might influence inflammation there. The studies on this are so far small and methodologically limited.
The effects of walking barefoot on foot muscles, balance and gait, by contrast, can be explained biomechanically and have been measured in randomized studies. If you feel good after walking barefoot, you do not need an electron theory to explain it. You can find a detailed assessment in my article on grounding and earthing.
More from the Guide to Natural Forces
Further topics in this cluster
- Using natural forces in everyday life: the overview
- Grounding and earthing: what there is to it
- Forest bathing: what happens in the body
- Forest bathing for stress and burnout
- Fresh air and oxygen
- Morning light and the internal clock
- Natural rhythms and the biological clock
- How much sun does the body need
- Vitamin D deficiency in winter
- Ice bathing for beginners
- Cold showers in the morning
- Contrast showers and Kneipp in everyday life
- Sauna and the heart: how often
- Breathing techniques and the vagus nerve
- Weather sensitivity, air pressure and joints
If muscles, joints and metabolism keep you thinking
Sarcopenia: muscle loss in older age
Why strength in older age can help determine independence
Strength training after 40
Muscles as an investment in the second half of life
Turmeric for joint pain and osteoarthritis
What studies on joint pain show and where they end
Strength training for diabetes and insulin resistance
Exercise as a metabolic lever, with well-protected feet
Sitting as a health risk
What prolonged sitting can change in the body
Recognizing overtraining
Warning signs when load and recovery fall out of step
Sources
All information was checked against the original abstracts in PubMed, and the figures are taken from the abstracts. Many studies on barefoot walking are small, short or compare populations in a cross-sectional design. Large, long-term randomized trials on injuries, posture and back pain are still lacking. The most comprehensive meta-analysis on foot exercises and minimalist shoes rates the certainty of the evidence as low to very low. Animal and cell studies were not used for this article.
- McKeon PO, Hertel J, Bramble D, Davis I. The foot core system: a new paradigm for understanding intrinsic foot muscle function. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(5):290. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092690 [Review, concept paper]
- Ridge ST, Olsen MT, Bruening DA, Jurgensmeier K, Griffin D, Davis IS, Johnson AW. Walking in minimalist shoes is effective for strengthening foot muscles. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(1):104-113. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001751 [RCT, n=57]
- Curtis R, Willems C, Paoletti P, D'Août K. Daily activity in minimal footwear increases foot strength. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):18648. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98070-0 [Real-world, six-month intervention study without randomization]
- Xu J, Saliba SA, Jaffri AH. The effects of minimalist shoes on plantar intrinsic foot muscle size and strength: a systematic review. Int J Sports Med. 2023;44(5):320-328. DOI: 10.1055/a-1908-8867 [Systematic review, 9 controlled studies]
- Peters-Dickie JL, Detrembleur C, Guallar-Bouloc M, Rastelli M, Lobet S, Hidalgo B, Deschamps K. The effects of foot core exercises and minimalist footwear on foot muscle sizes, foot strength, and biomechanics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2025;122:106417. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106417 [Meta-analysis, 28 RCTs, n=1,399, certainty of evidence low to very low]
- Holowka NB, Wallace IJ, Lieberman DE. Foot strength and stiffness are related to footwear use in a comparison of minimally- vs. conventionally-shod populations. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3679. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-21916-7 [Real-world, cross-sectional comparison of two populations]
- Kennedy PM, Inglis JT. Distribution and behaviour of glabrous cutaneous receptors in the human foot sole. J Physiol. 2002;538(Pt 3):995-1002. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013087 [Basic research in humans, microneurography, n=13]
- Viseux FJF. The sensory role of the sole of the foot: review and update on clinical perspectives. Neurophysiol Clin. 2020;50(1):55-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2019.12.003 [Review]
- Holowka NB, Wynands B, Drechsel TJ, Yegian AK, Tobolsky VA, Okutoyi P, Mang'eni Ojiambo R, Haile DW, Sigei TK, Zippenfennig C, Milani TL, Lieberman DE. Foot callus thickness does not trade off protection for tactile sensitivity during walking. Nature. 2019;571(7764):261-264. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1345-6 [Real-world, cross-sectional study in Kenya and the USA]
- Franklin S, Grey MJ, Heneghan N, Bowen L, Li FX. Barefoot vs common footwear: a systematic review of the kinematic, kinetic and muscle activity differences during walking. Gait Posture. 2015;42(3):230-239. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.05.019 [Systematic review, 15 studies]
- Wallace IJ, Koch E, Holowka NB, Lieberman DE. Heel impact forces during barefoot versus minimally shod walking among Tarahumara subsistence farmers and urban Americans. R Soc Open Sci. 2018;5(3):180044. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.180044 [Real-world, biomechanical comparison study, n=65]
- Mickle KJ, Munro BJ, Lord SR, Menz HB, Steele JR. ISB Clinical Biomechanics Award 2009: toe weakness and deformity increase the risk of falls in older people. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2009;24(10):787-791. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.08.011 [Cohort, prospective, n=312]
- Koepsell TD, Wolf ME, Buchner DM, Kukull WA, LaCroix AZ, Tencer AF, Frankenfeld CL, Tautvydas M, Larson EB. Footwear style and risk of falls in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(9):1495-1501. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52412.x [Case-control, nested in a cohort of 1,371 people, 327 cases and 327 controls]
- Spink MJ, Menz HB, Fotoohabadi MR, Wee E, Landorf KB, Hill KD, Lord SR. Effectiveness of a multifaceted podiatry intervention to prevent falls in community dwelling older people with disabling foot pain: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2011;342:d3411. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d3411 [RCT, n=305]
- Mølgaard CM, Rathleff MS, Andreasen J, Christensen M, Lundbye-Christensen S, Simonsen O, Kaalund S. Foot exercises and foot orthoses are more effective than knee focused exercises in individuals with patellofemoral pain. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(1):10-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.05.019 [RCT, n=40]
- Lieberman DE, Venkadesan M, Werbel WA, Daoud AI, D'Andrea S, Davis IS, Mang'eni RO, Pitsiladis Y. Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners. Nature. 2010;463(7280):531-535. DOI: 10.1038/nature08723 [Real-world, biomechanical comparison study in Kenya and the USA]
- Kulmala JP, Avela J, Pasanen K, Parkkari J. Forefoot strikers exhibit lower running-induced knee loading than rearfoot strikers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(12):2306-2313. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31829efcf7 [Real-world, biomechanical cross-sectional study, n=38]
- Anderson LM, Bonanno DR, Hart HF, Barton CJ. What are the benefits and risks associated with changing foot strike pattern during running? A systematic review and meta-analysis of injury, running economy, and biomechanics. Sports Med. 2020;50(5):885-917. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-019-01238-y [Meta-analysis, 53 studies]
- Shakoor N, Block JA. Walking barefoot decreases loading on the lower extremity joints in knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(9):2923-2927. DOI: 10.1002/art.22123 [Real-world, gait analysis barefoot versus everyday shoes, n=75]
- Trombini-Souza F, Matias AB, Yokota M, Butugan MK, Goldenstein-Schainberg C, Fuller R, Sacco ICN. Long-term use of minimal footwear on pain, self-reported function, analgesic intake, and joint loading in elderly women with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2015;30(10):1194-1201. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.08.004 [RCT, n=56]
- Paterson KL, Bennell KL, Campbell PK, Metcalf BR, Wrigley TV, Kasza J, Hinman RS. The effect of flat flexible versus stable supportive shoes on knee osteoarthritis symptoms: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174(4):462-471. DOI: 10.7326/M20-6321 [RCT, n=164]
- Rao UB, Joseph B. The influence of footwear on the prevalence of flat foot. A survey of 2300 children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74(4):525-527. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.74B4.1624509 [Real-world, cross-sectional study, n=2,300]
- Hollander K, de Villiers JE, Sehner S, Wegscheider K, Braumann KM, Venter R, Zech A. Growing-up (habitually) barefoot influences the development of foot and arch morphology in children and adolescents. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):8079. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07868-4 [Real-world, multicenter cross-sectional study]
- Zech A, Venter R, de Villiers JE, Sehner S, Wegscheider K, Hollander K. Motor skills of children and adolescents are influenced by growing up barefoot or shod. Front Pediatr. 2018;6:115. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2018.00115 [Real-world, cross-sectional study, n=810]
- Quinlan S, Sinclair P, Hunt A, Fong Yan A. The long-term effects of wearing moderate minimalist shoes on a child's foot strength, muscle structure and balance: a randomised controlled trial. Gait Posture. 2022;92:371-377. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.12.009 [RCT, n=70 children]
- Fong Yan A, Quinlan S, Cheung RTH. Minimalist school shoes improve intrinsic foot muscle size, strength, and arch integrity among primary school students. J Sports Sci. 2024;42(12):1157-1163. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2024.2386213 [Real-world, controlled intervention study without randomization, 17 of 30 children completed]
- Ridge ST, Johnson AW, Mitchell UH, Hunter I, Robinson E, Rich BS, Brown SD. Foot bone marrow edema after a 10-wk transition to minimalist running shoes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(7):1363-1368. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182874769 [RCT, n=36]
- Salzler MJ, Bluman EM, Noonan S, Chiodo CP, de Asla RJ. Injuries observed in minimalist runners. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(4):262-266. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0262 [Case series, n=10]
- Ryan M, Elashi M, Newsham-West R, Taunton J. Examining injury risk and pain perception in runners using minimalist footwear. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(16):1257-1262. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-092061 [RCT, n=99 analyzed]
- Fuller JT, Thewlis D, Buckley JD, Brown NAT, Hamill J, Tsiros MD. Body mass and weekly training distance influence the pain and injuries experienced by runners using minimalist shoes: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(5):1162-1170. DOI: 10.1177/0363546516682497 [RCT, n=61]
- Sánchez-Del Río E, Galán-Arriero I, Palomo-Fernández I, Marcos-Tejedor F, Martín-Casado L. Injury risk associated with the transition to minimalist footwear in runners: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gait Posture. 2026;131:110614. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110614 [Meta-analysis, 12 studies, 7 of them pooled with 313 participants]
- Hollander K, Heidt C, van der Zwaard BC, Braumann KM, Zech A. Long-term effects of habitual barefoot running and walking: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(4):752-762. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001141 [Systematic review with meta-analysis, 15 studies, n=8,399]
- Bus SA, Sacco ICN, Monteiro-Soares M, Raspovic A, Paton J, Rasmussen A, Lavery LA, van Netten JJ. Guidelines on the prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2023 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024;40(3):e3651. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3651 [Systematic review, international guideline IWGDF 2023]