Guide Burnout · Recovery

Recovery after burnout: why regeneration is often not linear

After burnout, many people expect a line that rises steadily. Long-term studies point more towards different speeds and courses, and many people experience recovery in waves. In a Swedish clinical cohort, mood and anxiety mostly improved early, exhaustion took considerably longer, and after seven years reduced stress tolerance was the most common residual symptom. Setbacks can be part of this path.

SJ
Shukri Jarmoukli · Physician, Integrative Medicine · ViveCura Berlin
Long-term data from Sweden, the Netherlands and Denmark Waves instead of a straight line Return to work, with data 45 studies, 44 of them with DOI, plus 3 guidelines and the WHO classification
If things feel very dark right now If you are thinking about suicide: please get help immediately

Burnout and depression often overlap. If you are thinking about taking your own life, or you no longer feel safe, do not wait for your next appointment and do not read on here before you have got help.

  • Telefonseelsorge (German crisis line): 0800 111 0 111 and 0800 111 0 222, around the clock and free of charge
  • In acute danger: emergency number 112
  • Or go directly to the nearest psychiatric hospital or emergency department, even without an appointment

These are German numbers. If you are outside Germany, please use the crisis line and emergency number of the country you are in.

You do not have to carry this alone. Getting help is the most important step in this moment, and it is not a sign of weakness.

Before you read on

When you should not wait for recovery

Recovery takes time. Some signs should still be assessed by a doctor promptly, because they can point to something other than a slow course.

Mental health red flags: suicidal thoughts, self-harm, psychotic symptoms such as hearing voices or fixed beliefs that nobody else shares, marked loss of drive lasting weeks, unintended weight loss, or if you are barely managing to look after yourself with food, drink and personal hygiene.

Physical red flags: chest pain or shortness of breath on exertion, fever or night sweats without explanation, falling asleep at the wheel, pauses in breathing during sleep observed by others.

About medication: if you take an antidepressant, a mood stabiliser, an antipsychotic, a sleeping pill, thyroid hormones or any other prescribed medication, this article is no reason to change anything about it. Stopping abruptly carries its own risks. After longer use of benzodiazepines or so-called Z-drugs it can even be dangerous, up to and including seizures. Any change, including tapering, belongs in the hands of the doctor who prescribed it.

Why I am writing this

After burnout, I rarely hear the question of what someone has. I hear a different one: Why am I still not feeling better after weeks of rest? This question deserves data rather than rules of thumb.

You had imagined the first weeks of sick leave differently. Finally some rest. No inbox, no pressure. You thought the battery would now recharge.

Instead, you sleep for a long time and still wake up tired. A trip to the supermarket feels like a working day. You read the same book up to the middle three times. And on a good day you tidy the basement, only to be flat on your back for two days afterwards.

Many people know this pattern and draw a conclusion that hurts: I am recovering the wrong way.

Let us look at what long-term studies report about duration, waves, supporting building blocks and the path back to work.

The essentials in 60 seconds
  • In a Swedish clinical cohort, after 18 months of treatment one third still had clinical burnout symptoms. After seven years, 16 percent felt fully recovered, 59 percent much better, 21 percent better.
  • Depressive symptoms and anxiety there mostly declined within the first three months. Stress tolerance, concentration and memory often took considerably longer.
  • Recovery rarely follows a straight line. Setbacks are common and are not the same as a relapse. No study source could be found for the widely quoted relapse rate of 50 to 60 percent.
  • Detachment, sleep, carefully dosed activity, people and nature can support recovery. Psychotherapy is a central building block.
  • Several findings suggest that returning to unchanged conditions can increase the risk of another breakdown. With persistent exhaustion, a medical assessment of iron, thyroid, sleep apnoea and depression can be worthwhile. On vitamin D, views are divided.
RCT / Meta randomised or pooled Human cohort, register, observation, interviews Guideline recommendation of a professional society

This article starts where the acute crisis eases. If you are right at the beginning, Burnout, what to do? The first steps is the better place to start. Forms of therapy are described in Burnout treatment and therapy, and the main article Burnout gives the big picture.

How long does recovery after burnout take? What long-term studies show

How much longer? This question is often in the room as early as the second week. With the employer, in the family, in your own head.

The answers online sound surprisingly certain. Three months. Six months. As long as it took to get there. What does exist are follow-up data. They are more honest than any rule of thumb, and more reassuring than they look at first glance.

Cohort, n=232 The first 18 months

A Swedish team led by Glise followed 232 people with Exhaustion Disorder, a diagnosis used mainly in Sweden for severe stress-related exhaustion, through 18 months of multimodal treatment at a stress clinic.

After 18 months, one third still had symptoms of clinical burnout. Depressive symptoms and anxiety, present in 34 and 65 percent at the start, declined faster, mostly within the first three months, and at the end were found in only one in ten. The duration of symptoms before the first treatment predicted recovery from the burnout symptoms.

What this means for you: if your mood lifts but the exhaustion remains, something is not necessarily going wrong. This very sequence was seen frequently.

Glise K, Ahlborg G Jr, Jonsdottir IH. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:18. PMID: 22409935 · DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-18 [Cohort, clinical, n=232]
Cohort, 7 years, n=217 Seven years later

The same team followed 217 former patients with Exhaustion Disorder over seven years, and 163 of them were also examined clinically.

After seven years, 16 percent reported being fully recovered, 59 percent felt much better, 21 percent better, and 4 percent unchanged or worse. The clinical examination confirmed that about one third were still assessed as having stress-related exhaustion.

What this means for you: much better is common. Exactly as before is less common. Both belong to an honest expectation, and neither is a prediction for you.

Glise K, Wiegner L, Jonsdottir IH. BMC Psychol. 2020;8(1):26. PMID: 32188513 · DOI: 10.1186/s40359-020-0395-8 [Cohort, 7-year follow-up, n=217]

A Dutch cohort study followed working people, not patients, for four years with questionnaires. With burnout alone, 40 percent recovered and the course was chronic in 2 percent. When prolonged fatigue was added, it was chronic in 29 percent (Leone 2008). This is not directly comparable with the clinical data. Together, however, both show that there is no single course.

Clinical data tend to reflect severe courses, and none of these figures is a prognosis for you. I found no study for the rule of thumb that recovery takes as long as the path into burnout. The closest thing to it is that the duration of symptoms before treatment predicted recovery, an association and not a formula. If you only sought help late, that is not a reproach, but one more reason to be patient with yourself. The well-known stage models are discussed in the article on burnout phases.

How high is the risk of relapse after burnout?

On several websites you can read that the risk of relapse after burnout is 50 to 60 percent. I have not found a study that this figure comes from. That does not mean relapses are rare. It means that this figure is not supported by evidence. What does exist are register data on renewed sick leave.

Cohort, register, n=9,904 Renewed sick leave

A Dutch team led by Koopmans analysed register data from 9,904 employees who were on sick leave for the first time because of a common mental disorder, such as distress, adjustment disorder or depression. A recurrence was defined as a new episode of sick leave after at least 28 days of full return.

Over seven years, 1,925 of them, that is 19 percent, went on sick leave again. 90 percent of these recurrences occurred within three years. The authors recommend conversations on relapse prevention for three years after the return.

What this means for you: the first three years after returning deserve attention, not fear. What was counted was sick leave, not symptoms, and not burnout specifically.

Koopmans PC, Bültmann U, Roelen CA, Hoedeman R, van der Klink JJ, Groothoff JW. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011;84(2):193-201. PMID: 20449605 · DOI: 10.1007/s00420-010-0540-4 [Cohort, register, n=9,904]
Reframe

The question How much longer? has a more honest sister: How do I notice that things are moving in the right direction? For the first, there is no reliable number for you personally. For the second, there are answers, and they are what the rest of this article is about.

And now you know why a serious answer to the question of duration begins with a range and not with a date.

When the mind needs longer than the body: concentration, memory, capacity to handle demands

The fatigue is easing, you can cook again and meet friends. And yet you lose the thread after one page of reading, and two conversations at once feel like noise.

Many people get a fright at exactly this point, because they had expected a clear head to return along with the energy.

In the Swedish seven-year study, the most common residual symptom was not fatigue. 73 percent reported reduced stress tolerance. According to the study's table, 46 percent named extreme fatigue, 42 percent memory problems and 36 percent concentration problems (Glise 2020).

Cohort with control group Three years later

A Swedish team led by Jonsdottir tested people with stress-related exhaustion neuropsychologically at baseline and on average three years later, and compared them with healthy controls.

Half still reported psychological symptoms. Cognitive performance barely changed over time and remained significantly weaker than in the controls, especially for speed, attention and memory. The authors write that this should be taken into account in treatment and in conversations about returning to work.

What this means for you: if your mind takes longer than you expected, that is a described pattern and not a sign that you are not trying hard enough.

Jonsdottir IH, Nordlund A, Ellbin S, Ljung T, Glise K, Währborg P, Sjörs A, Wallin A. Scand J Psychol. 2017;58(6):504-509. PMID: 29023756 · DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12394 [Cohort with control group, n=30 vs 27]

Data from Denmark offer more hope. A team led by Eskildsen tested people with work-related stress complaints one year apart and compared them with matched healthy people. Prospective memory and processing speed improved, while at the same time memory problems became visible after the acute phase (Eskildsen 2016). After four years, a team led by Dalgaard found a significant, small difference from healthy people in the same group only for immediate memory. The biggest step came in the first year. More than half felt only slightly or partially recovered, while participation in working life had increased considerably (Dalgaard 2021).

So the ability to work can return before you feel fully recovered. Both are real. Honesty also requires this: in a Swedish survey 7 to 12 years after diagnosis, even people who had recovered clinically reported more cognitive problems and more fatigue than healthy people, and the authors consider it possible that individual residual symptoms remain in some (Ellbin 2021). This is a cautious group finding and not a prediction for you.

Cohort, n=45 Felt and measured

A Swedish team led by Österberg re-examined 45 former burnout patients after one and a half years, with memory and attention tests and with salivary cortisol over the course of the day.

Several tests of short-term memory and attention showed improvements. Self-rated problems decreased markedly, but without any connection to the test results. Cortisol over the course of the day and the rise after waking did not change. The authors describe the impairment as mild and reversible to a measurable extent.

What this means for you: how clear your head feels and how it performs in tests can diverge. And according to these data, a daily cortisol profile is not suitable as a thermometer for your recovery. More on this in Cortisol and the HPA axis in burnout.

Österberg K, Karlson B, Malmberg B, Hansen ÅM. Stress. 2012;15(6):589-600. PMID: 22168599 · DOI: 10.3109/10253890.2011.648972 [Cohort, n=45, 1.5 years]

A very small Swiss study of twelve men with burnout found better executive functions after twelve weeks in which the participants did regular aerobic exercise. According to the title, these functions can recover to the level of healthy people (Beck 2013). Twelve people without a comparison group that did not train: a hint, not proof.

Can cognitive recovery be supported in a targeted way? A Swedish team led by Malmberg Gavelin gave 132 people with Exhaustion Disorder twelve weeks of cognitive training, aerobic training or no addition, on top of rehabilitation. Cognitive training was associated with a small but lasting improvement in global cognitive performance, while mental health and work ability improved equally in all groups (Malmberg Gavelin 2018). After 4.5 years, the cognitive training group still showed effects, for example on episodic memory, although only 56 of the 132 took part in this follow-up (Aronsson 2026).

Reframe

The capacity to handle demands is not the same as energy. The ability to carry a lot at once, to cope with interruptions and to think clearly under time pressure often comes later. So do not measure your progress by whether your old working day is already possible again, but by whether something is easier today than it was six weeks ago.

If concentration problems are very pronounced or do not fit the course, it is also worth looking at physical causes such as iron deficiency. More on this below and in Iron deficiency and brain fog.

And now you know why a clear head sometimes takes longer than hoped, and why that is no proof that something has been lost.

Why recovery comes in waves

Tuesday was a good day. You tidied up, made phone calls, went for a walk. On Wednesday and Thursday you were flat on your back. And then the thought: I am back at the beginning.

Many people know this rollercoaster. It is one of the most common reasons why people doubt themselves during the regeneration phase after burnout.

Cohort, trajectory groups, n=85 Not one curve, but several

A Finnish team led by Hätinen followed 85 people through a one-year burnout rehabilitation and six months afterwards, and looked for typical trajectory groups.

They found three: 39 people with low burnout scores, 29 with high scores who benefited, and 17 with high scores who did not benefit. Recovery was associated with more resources and fewer demands at work, as well as with higher job satisfaction and fewer depressive symptoms.

What this means for you: there is no single recovery curve. And whether things move upwards does not depend only on you, but also on what changes around you.

Hätinen M, Kinnunen U, Mäkikangas A, Kalimo R, Tolvanen A, Pekkonen M. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2009;22(3):341-360. PMID: 19283645 · DOI: 10.1080/10615800802567023 [Cohort, trajectory groups, n=85]

A Swedish study led by Eklöf compared the records of 150 people with Exhaustion Disorder at diagnosis and 7 to 12 years later. Neither adverse childhood experiences nor the stressors at diagnosis were associated with long-lasting exhaustion, but ongoing responsibility was: leadership roles and caring responsibility for a child were reported more often in the group that remained exhausted, for caring responsibility 24 versus 6 percent (Eklöf 2022). People who carry responsibility for others are not doing anything wrong. They are recovering under different conditions.

When things get worse as soon as the pressure drops

Many people describe it in the first weeks of sick leave or on the first holiday after a long period of overload: just as things calm down, headaches, infections and leaden fatigue appear. Here I have to say clearly how thin the evidence is. For burnout itself, I have not found a study that examines this phenomenon directly. There are only small findings from neighbouring fields.

Cross-sectional and case-control, pilot study Ill when work pauses

A Dutch team led by Vingerhoets surveyed a representative sample of 1,128 men and 765 women about weekend and vacation sickness, and compared 114 affected people with 56 controls.

Among the men, 3.6 and 3.2 percent recognised themselves in the weekend and vacation variants, among the women 2.7 and 3.2 percent, mainly with headache or migraine, fatigue, muscle pain and nausea. Risk factors were a high workload, difficulty adjusting to time off work, a strong need to achieve and a strong sense of responsibility towards work.

What this means for you: that your body speaks up precisely when you rest is a described pattern and no proof that rest is wrong. People with burnout were not studied here.

Vingerhoets AJ, Van Huijgevoort M, Van Heck GL. Psychother Psychosom. 2002;71(6):311-317. PMID: 12411765 · DOI: 10.1159/000065992 [Cross-sectional and case-control, pilot study]

In a US diary study led by Lipton with 17 people with migraine included in the analysis, a drop in stress from one evening to the next was associated with more attacks in the following 6, 12 and 18 hours, with odds ratios between 1.5 and 1.9 (Lipton 2014). A model for thinking about a let-down effect, not evidence for burnout.

Mechanistically plausible, human studies thin

Why rest might at first feel restless

  1. Under sustained pressure, the stress axis and the sympathetic nervous system can run in heightened mode for a long time. This could mask symptoms for a while.
  2. When the pressure drops, the system presumably has to switch over. This switch can itself be a transition and not immediate calm.
  3. At the same time, attention can be freed up, so that symptoms that were previously masked can be perceived more strongly.

Derived from mechanisms and neighbouring fields, not tested for burnout.

How fleeting breaks alone can be is shown by a meta-analysis led by de Bloom of seven studies with healthy employees: vacations had small positive effects, d = +0.43, which faded quickly after the return to work, d = −0.38 (de Bloom 2009). Like a battery that charges and can quickly run flat again in the old device. Recovery therefore needs not only a break, but also a look at the device.

In clinical practice I observe

Setbacks often follow good days. On a day with energy, people catch up on what has been left undone, and one or two days later the slump comes. This is an observation from my consultations, not a study result. But it explains why comparing one day with the next is so often discouraging.

Remember this sentence

Setbacks can be part of the course of recovery. They are not a failure.

A setback is a bad day or a bad week within a movement that can go forward overall. A relapse is a renewed, lasting breakdown. Compare weeks with weeks and months with months, because a single day says little about your direction.

And there is a limit: if a low lasts for weeks or red flags appear, this is not a setback to sit out, but a reason for a prompt conversation with a doctor.

And what if the issue is not overload, but emptiness?

Not all exhaustion comes from too much. With boreout, chronic underload, people also feel empty and tired, but for a different reason. Recovery from overload starts with relief and gradual rebuilding. With boreout, it is less about more rest and more about meaning and stimulation. If you recognise yourself more there, read Boreout: recognising chronic underload as a phenomenon in its own right.

And now you know why a bad Thursday does not mean you are back at the beginning.

Recovery experiences: detachment, relaxation, mastery, control

You are lying on the sofa. A series is playing. And in your head, the email you could no longer answer three weeks ago is playing too. Physically, this is rest. Inwardly, it is work.

This is where a concept from occupational psychology comes in. Its basics are covered in Burnout prevention. Here, the focus is on the time after the breakdown.

Validation study, N=930 Four sides of recovery

Sabine Sonnentag and Charlotte Fritz developed a questionnaire that captures how people recover from work in their free time, and tested it in a total of 930 people.

Four separate recovery experiences could be distinguished: psychological detachment from work, relaxation, mastery and control. They were moderately associated with job stressors and with well-being, and mostly only weakly with personality.

What this means for you: recovery is not simply doing nothing. It has at least four sides, and each can be looked at on its own.

Sonnentag S, Fritz C. J Occup Health Psychol. 2007;12(3):204-221. PMID: 17638488 · DOI: 10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204 [Validation study, N=930]
Detachment

Not being at work in your thoughts. Not only physically away, but also in your head.

Relaxation

Low activation, physically and mentally. Rest that also feels like rest.

Mastery

Small new challenges outside work that give a sense of competence.

Control

Being able to decide for yourself what you do with your free time and how.

A meta-analysis led by Wendsche with 91 samples and 38,124 people found that those who were better able to detach reported, on average, less exhaustion, better sleep and less fatigue, with small to medium effects, but without a significant association with physiological stress markers. High work investment went along with more difficulty detaching (Wendsche 2016). These are associations, not evidence of cause and effect.

Reframe

If you find it hard to detach, that is not a character flaw and not a matter of lacking discipline. In the data, high work investment went along with more difficulty detaching. Detachment is therefore not a question of willpower, but a skill that can be learned anew. There are data on this.

Meta-analysis, k=30, N=3,725 Detachment can be learned

A team led by Karabinski pooled 30 studies with 34 interventions and 3,725 participants that specifically aimed to improve detachment from work.

On average, the programmes improved detachment with an effect size of d = 0.36. Longer and more intensive programmes performed better. Older participants and people with existing health-related or recovery-related impairments benefited more.

What this means for you: especially people who are already struggling seem, in these data, to gain more from practice, particularly over a longer period rather than in a crash course.

Karabinski T, Haun VC, Nübold A, Wendsche J, Wegge J. J Occup Health Psychol. 2021;26(3):224-242. PMID: 34096763 · DOI: 10.1037/ocp0000280 [Meta-analysis, k=30, 34 interventions, N=3,725]

How much time this takes is shown by a non-randomised study led by Hahn with 95 employees and two training sessions: after three weeks they reported more recovery experiences, for mastery only after one week, along with better sleep quality and less perceived stress. Emotional exhaustion did not change (Hahn 2011). Recovery seems to need more time than a seminar.

What this can mean, as a direction and not as a plan

  • Detachment can come more easily with boundaries that are not renegotiated every day. A work phone that does not lie on the bedside table can be one such boundary.
  • Mastery does not mean performance. A new recipe, a few chords, a flower bed: small experiences of competence where nothing depends on the outcome.
  • Control means that at least part of your day belongs to you and does not have to be scheduled or justified.

Mastery, by the way, is in my view exactly the part that often falls short in chronic underload. With boreout, what is needed tends to be more of it rather than more rest.

And now you know why sofa and series do not always feel like recovery: the body is resting, but the mind has not yet detached.

The building blocks with evidence: sleep, exercise, light, people, nature, mindfulness

Sleep more. Do sport. Get out into nature. Meditate. Perhaps this list has put you under more pressure rather than taking pressure off. That is why each building block is considered here on its own, with the question of how robust the evidence is.

Sleep as the foundation

Cohort with sleep laboratory, n=23 vs 16 Sleep as a building block and as a yardstick

A team led by Ekstedt examined 23 people who had been on sick leave for burnout for more than three months, and 16 healthy people, in the sleep laboratory, at baseline and after 6 to 12 months of rehabilitation.

With recovery, sleep became more consolidated. The burnout group improved on all symptom measures without reaching the level of the healthy participants. Recovery from fatigue was associated with fewer arousals during sleep and was the best predictor of returning to work.

What this means for you: calmer, less fragmented sleep can be both a building block of recovery and a sign that it is progressing.

Ekstedt M, Söderström M, Akerstedt T. Biol Psychol. 2009;82(3):267-273. PMID: 19699775 · DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.08.006 [Cohort with polysomnography, n=23 vs 16]

More on how the two interact is in Burnout and sleep disorders, and on cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia in CBT-I and sleep restriction. If you take sleeping pills: after longer use of benzodiazepines or Z-drugs, stopping abruptly can be dangerous, up to and including seizures. Tapering should be supervised by a doctor.

Exercise, carefully dosed

Exercise is considered a universal remedy, but in burnout the evidence is more nuanced. In a meta-analysis led by Ochentel, the confidence interval of the pooled effect size ranged from −0.41 to 0.09, with no clear difference from the control condition. The authors do not see the widespread assumption that exercise therapy successfully relieves burnout symptoms as supported by their work (Ochentel 2018).

RCT, n=88 Memory yes, sticking with it is hard

A Swedish team led by Eskilsson randomised people with Exhaustion Disorder to an additional twelve weeks of moderate to high intensity aerobic training or no additional training.

51 percent of the training group and 78 percent of the control group completed the intervention period. The training group improved its maximal oxygen uptake and its episodic memory. No additional improvement in burnout, depression or anxiety was seen.

What this means for you: aerobic training can support fitness and memory. At this intensity, it was hard to sustain for almost half of the participants, and the authors name feasibility as a challenge.

Eskilsson T, Slunga Järvholm L, Malmberg Gavelin H, Stigsdotter Neely A, Boraxbekk CJ. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):322. PMID: 28865430 · DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1457-1 [RCT, open-label, n=88]

In the study led by Malmberg Gavelin, too, aerobic training improved aerobic capacity and episodic memory only directly after the training, without long-term benefit (Malmberg Gavelin 2018), and after 4.5 years it showed no extended effect on cognitive performance (Aronsson 2026).

What follows from this? Not that exercise is harmful. What is documented is that intensive programmes can be hard to sustain in this phase and that an effect on burnout scores remains unclear. Too much too soon can be overwhelming. The more cautious direction is a dose guided by how you feel the following day rather than by your earlier training plan, agreed with a doctor or physiotherapist. More in Training despite burnout, while Recovery after sport deals with recovery after training, not after exhaustion.

One distinction: if symptoms regularly worsen after exertion with a delay and for days, this can point to exertion intolerance as in ME/CFS. This should be assessed by a doctor, see Exercise with chronic exhaustion and ME/CFS viewed individually.

Daylight and rhythm

I have not found any studies of their own on daylight or light therapy in burnout. In the neighbouring field, the German National Disease Management Guideline (NVL) Unipolar Depression recommends offering a trial of light therapy for depression with a seasonal pattern, as a "should" recommendation with moderate certainty of evidence. Without a seasonal pattern a trial can be offered, with very low certainty of evidence. As a rule, light therapy is used there in addition to other treatments [Guideline].

Mechanistically plausible, human studies for burnout are lacking: morning light is considered an important timekeeper for the internal clock, which can help to organise sleep, wakefulness and hormonal rhythms. On sick leave, it is often precisely the timekeepers of the working day that fall away. More in Chronobiology and morning light.

People and connection

After burnout, many people withdraw. Not out of lack of interest, but because every conversation costs energy. A meta-analysis led by Halbesleben found that support from the work environment was more closely related to exhaustion than to the other burnout dimensions, while for support from outside work it was the other way round (Halbesleben 2006). Both sources count, in different places.

A Finnish team led by Salminen spoke with twelve people whose burnout scores had decreased during rehabilitation. Their process began with support from professionals, the group, family and friends, went on to acknowledging their own needs and limits, and ended with regained joy (Salminen 2015). Twelve interviews cannot be generalised, but the pattern is still remarkable.

Reframe

In these accounts, connection is a starting condition and not a reward. You do not have to function again first before you are allowed to have people around you. And if nobody comes to mind right now, that is not a failing, but a topic that deserves room in treatment.

Nature

RCT, active control, n=84 Nature compared with an established treatment

A Danish team led by Stigsdotter compared nature-based therapy with an established treatment based on cognitive behavioural therapy in 84 people with stress-related illnesses.

Both were associated with a significant increase in well-being and a decrease in burnout scores, and both persisted after 12 months. No significant difference between the two approaches was found.

What this means for you: nature can be a serious setting for recovery. But no measurable difference in one study is not the same as being equally well proven, and it does not make nature a substitute for psychotherapy.

Stigsdotter UK, Corazon SS, Sidenius U, Nyed PK, Larsen HB, Fjorback LO. Br J Psychiatry. 2018;213(1):404-411. PMID: 29793558 · DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2018.2 [RCT, active control, n=84]

For the general population, a meta-analysis led by Twohig-Bennett found that more time spent in green space was associated with lower salivary cortisol, lower heart rate and higher heart rate variability, with study quality that was weak in part (Twohig-Bennett 2018). More in Forest bathing.

Mindfulness and relaxation methods

A Swedish team led by Grensman compared 20 weeks of traditional yoga, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy in groups, in people on 50 to 100 percent sick leave because of burnout. All three were associated with improvements in quality of life, for example in well-being, cognitive function and sleep, with no statistical differences between the treatments and without an untreated control group (Grensman 2018).

Meta-analysis, Cochrane, 117 RCTs In the short term yes, with low certainty

A Cochrane team led by Tamminga pooled 117 randomised trials with 11,119 healthcare workers on individual-level interventions against occupational stress.

Approaches that focus on the experience of stress, such as cognitive behavioural therapy or mindfulness, may have reduced stress symptoms in the short term, corresponding to about 4.6 points less on the emotional exhaustion scale. Approaches that shift the focus away from stress, such as relaxation or exercise, came to about 6.8 points less. The certainty of evidence was low, and long-term effects remained unclear.

What this means for you: such approaches can reduce stress symptoms. The data, however, come from healthcare professions and mostly from prevention, not from the return after clinical burnout.

Tamminga SJ, Emal LM, Boschman JS, Levasseur A, Thota A, Ruotsalainen JH, Schelvis RM, Nieuwenhuijsen K, van der Molen HF. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;5(5):CD002892. PMID: 37169364 · DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002892.pub6 [Meta-analysis, Cochrane, 117 RCTs, 11,119 participants]

Breathing and vagus exercises are a field of their own. More on this in Vagus nerve and stress regulation in burnout and Breathing techniques and the nervous system.

Reframe

None of these building blocks is a compulsory exercise. Several approaches performed similarly in studies, and that takes the pressure off. Choose the approach you can sustain in this phase, together with the people treating you, and in addition to treatment, not in its place.

And now you know why a short list of suitable building blocks can carry more than a long list with all of them.

Psychotherapy and work-related support: what Cochrane and meta-analyses show

Perhaps you already have a place in therapy. Perhaps you are still waiting. And perhaps you are wondering whether therapy will get you back to work faster.

First of all: psychotherapy is a central building block of treatment after burnout, especially with depressive symptoms, anxiety or entrenched patterns. Nothing here is a reason to postpone therapy. The question is narrower: what shortens the time until return, and what relieves symptoms? These are two goals that studies measure separately. The forms of therapy are described in Burnout treatment and therapy.

Meta-analysis, Cochrane, 9 studies Time to return as the endpoint

A Cochrane team led by Arends pooled nine studies with 1,546 participants on interventions to facilitate return to work in adjustment disorders, a related field in which burnout is not reported separately.

For the endpoint time to return, cognitive behavioural therapy, with moderate quality of evidence, showed a similar time to partial return after one year as no treatment. In the untreated comparison groups, the assumed time to partial return was 88 days, and to full return 252 days. Problem-solving therapy significantly shortened the time to partial return compared with non-guideline-based care, by 17 days on average, but not the time to full return.

What this means for you: this finding concerns a single endpoint, the time to return. It says nothing about the value of psychotherapy for your symptoms and your well-being.

Arends I, Bruinvels DJ, Rebergen DS, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Madan I, Neumeyer-Gromen A, Bültmann U, Verbeek JH. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12(12):CD006389. PMID: 23235630 · DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006389.pub2 [Meta-analysis, Cochrane, k=9, 1,546 participants]

In the neighbouring field of depression, a Cochrane team led by Nieuwenhuijsen pooled 45 studies with 12,109 participants. Combining a work-directed and a clinical intervention probably reduced sick leave days in the first year, by about 25 days in one year, with moderate certainty of evidence. A specific work-directed intervention on its own, by contrast, might even increase sick leave days compared with usual work-related care, with low certainty of evidence (Nieuwenhuijsen 2020). In these data, the strongest case was therefore for combining treatment with a work focus.

Meta-analysis, 8 studies, clinical burnout Symptoms and return are two separate tasks

A team led by Perski pooled eight controlled studies on treatments for clinically relevant burnout.

The treatments shortened the time to return compared with usual care or waiting-list groups, with a hazard ratio of 4.5, with considerable heterogeneity and signs of publication bias. No significant effect was found on full return, nor on exhaustion, depression or anxiety. Successful programmes included counselling by occupational specialists that enabled those affected to enter into dialogue with their employer.

What this means for you: for the return, dialogue with the workplace seems to play a special role. For the symptoms, something else is often needed as well.

Perski O, Grossi G, Perski A, Niemi M. Scand J Psychol. 2017;58(6):551-561. PMID: 29105127 · DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12398 [Meta-analysis, k=8, clinical burnout]

How much time new patterns can take is shown by a Swedish follow-up led by Stenlund. After one year of cognitively oriented behavioural rehabilitation plus qigong, people on long-term sick leave because of burnout reported three years later that they were significantly better recovered, and they had lower burnout scores than the group with qigong alone. Sick leave rates did not differ, and both groups had improved. The authors write that it takes time to put cognitive tools into practice and to establish new behaviours (Stenlund 2012).

And more is not automatically faster. In a Swedish randomised trial led by Lindegård, 142 people with Exhaustion Disorder received standard treatment or, in addition, one to four individually tailored interventions. After 15 months, 30 percent in the intervention group and 34 percent in the control group were completely off sick leave, and the additional interventions reduced neither sick leave days nor burnout symptoms (Lindegård 2022).

If it becomes clear over time that depression is more in the foreground, this changes the treatment. More on this in Burnout, depression and exhaustion depression.

Reframe

If therapy does not get you back to your desk faster, that does not mean it achieves nothing. How you are doing, how you deal with limits, whether old patterns lose their power: these are goals in their own right. The follow-up by Stenlund suggests that such changes sometimes only become measurable years later.

And now you know why therapy and returning to work belong together, but do not measure the same thing.

Returning to work after burnout: step by step, and why unchanged conditions can be a risk

At some point the question comes: when are you coming back? And with it, a knot in your stomach. Not because you do not want to. But because you wonder whether anything there has changed.

Sick leave, rehabilitation and the Hamburg model, the German form of graded reintegration, are described in Burnout sick leave and return to work. Here, the focus is on what studies report about a successful return.

A Dutch team led by Vendelbosch analysed register data on 37,523 employees with mental health diagnoses, including 3,644 with burnout. In their introduction, the team describes the return to work with mental disorders as often being a process of gradually increasing working hours. In the data, the same four typical trajectories emerged for all diagnoses, including burnout, and depending on the diagnosis 82.4 to 92.0 percent returned fully and comparatively quickly (Vendelbosch 2024). So a step-by-step return is not an exception.

Controlled study, not randomised When work is adapted too

A Swedish team led by Karlson accompanied 74 people on sick leave because of burnout through a workplace-oriented intervention, with conversations between those affected and their supervisors about how person and work could fit together again. The comparison group consisted of 74 people who had declined to take part.

In the intervention group, the return rose steadily over one and a half years, and at the end 89 percent were back at least partially. In the comparison group, the rise came to a standstill after six months, at 73 percent.

What this means for you: where work was adapted as well, the return continued. However, the groups were not randomly assigned, and partially back includes part-time.

Karlson B, Jönsson P, Pålsson B, Abjörnsson G, Malmberg B, Larsson B, Osterberg K. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:301. PMID: 20515510 · DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-301 [Cohort, controlled, not randomised, n=74 vs 74]

The follow-up tempers this finding. After 130 weeks, 82.4 percent of the intervention group and 77.9 percent of the comparison group had returned, with no significant difference. A lasting advantage was suggested only in younger people, and partial sick leave did not predict a later stable full-time return (Karlson 2014).

A Finnish review led by Kärkkäinen found, across ten studies, favourable associations with good communication, undisturbed sleep and partial sick leave, and unfavourable ones with low control over work, covert coping and sick leave lasting more than six months (Kärkkäinen 2017). The latter may also reflect more severe courses and is no reason to shorten a necessary period of sick leave. The favourable finding on partial sick leave does not quite fit with the follow-up led by Karlson, in which partial sick leave did not predict a later stable full-time return. The two studies do, however, measure different things.

Why unchanged conditions can be a risk

Imagine a bridge that has developed cracks under constant load. If, after being closed, it is reopened to the same heavy traffic, the next problem may be foreseeable. The image does not mean that something is wrong with you. It refers to the load.

A Dutch team led by Arends followed 158 people after their return from sick leave due to common mental disorders. Conflict with a supervisor predicted renewed sickness absence, with an odds ratio of 2.21 (Arends 2014). Together with the findings on resources and demands (Hätinen 2009) and on fading vacation effects (de Bloom 2009), this suggests that returning to exactly the conditions that contributed to the breakdown can increase the risk of another breakdown.

What guidelines say

Two orientations for the return, neither specifically for burnout

NICE NG146, United Kingdom [Guideline]
The guideline recommends discussing adjustments that could make the return easier, such as flexible working hours, a phased return, reduced hours or modified duties. These should be recorded with timescales in a written return-to-work plan and reviewed regularly.
German National Disease Management Guideline (NVL) Unipolar Depression [Guideline]
In its section on incapacity for work in depressive disorders, which is aimed at cases without clear incapacity for work, the guideline group recommends in its clinical considerations that when incapacity for work looks set to last more than six weeks, GP care and psychiatric or psychotherapeutic care should coordinate, and advice on returning to work should be given in good time, for example on graded reintegration. It also points out that absence from the workplace can bring risk factors such as a lack of daily structure and loss of social contacts. The recommendations in this section explicitly do not refer to people who are clearly unable to work because of marked symptoms or the severity of their impairments. This does not call a necessary sick leave into question.

Both are orientation and not legal advice. Which form of return suits you is something to clarify with the people treating you and your employer.

Because 90 percent of the renewed episodes of sick leave in the Dutch register study occurred in the first three years, the authors recommend thinking about relapse prevention over three years (Koopmans 2011). What a personal early warning system can look like is described in Burnout prevention.

What can be derived as a direction

  • Think of the return as a process, not as a deadline, and talk about tasks, hours and availability beforehand.
  • Raise conflicts that are still open, with a neutral person if necessary, instead of carrying them along as a private matter.
  • Take residual cognitive symptoms seriously. The researchers led by Jonsdottir explicitly write that they should be taken into account in conversations about the return.
Reframe

A step-by-step return to work is not a sign that you cannot manage. It is a common path and is named in guidelines as an adjustment. And the wish that something at work should change is not a sense of entitlement, but, according to the data, a reasonable question about the conditions you are returning to.

And now you know why the day of your return counts for less than the conditions you return to.

What can additionally slow recovery: iron, thyroid, vitamin D, sleep apnoea, depression

It has been months now, and yet an exhaustion clings to you that does not match what has already changed. Then the question is worth asking: is all of this burnout?

The WHO lists burnout in ICD-11 as an occupational phenomenon and explicitly not as a medical condition [Classification]. The German National Disease Management Guideline (NVL) Unipolar Depression names burnout as a risk factor for mental illness and states that burnout symptoms can be a sign of an underlying depression and should be taken seriously [Guideline].

The S3 guideline on fatigue of the German College of General Practitioners and Family Physicians (DEGAM) recommends basic laboratory tests for primarily unexplained fatigue: blood glucose, full blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate or CRP, transaminases or gamma-GT, and TSH. Further tests should only follow if there are abnormal findings or specific indications [Guideline]. Burnout itself is explicitly not covered by this guideline, but it is still useful as orientation.

You will deliberately not find a table of normal values here: reference ranges depend on the laboratory, the measurement method, and often also on age and sex. Interpretation belongs in a conversation with a doctor, not in self-treatment.

Iron

RCT, n=198 Iron deficiency without anaemia

A team led by Vaucher studied 198 menstruating women aged 18 to 53 with fatigue, a ferritin below 50 µg/L and no anaemia, recruited in France. For twelve weeks they received oral iron, according to the study 80 mg of elemental iron daily, or a placebo.

The fatigue score fell by 47.7 percent in the iron group and by 28.8 percent in the placebo group. No significant effects were found on quality of life, depression or anxiety.

What this means for you: iron deficiency without anaemia can contribute to fatigue. The dose is a study figure and not a recommendation.

Vaucher P, Druais PL, Waldvogel S, Favrat B. CMAJ. 2012;184(11):1247-1254. PMID: 22777991 · DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.110950 [RCT, placebo-controlled, n=198]
Two perspectives side by side

The guideline and the functional view of ferritin

The DEGAM guideline considers the effects of supplementation in mild iron deficiency without anaemia, that is ferritin below 50 µg/l, to be probably placebo-related. It sees a benefit in tired women of childbearing age with ferritin below 15 µg/l or a transferrin saturation below 20 percent [Guideline].

In clinical practice I observe it differently, explicitly as an observation: in many exhausted people with a ferritin well below 100, a thorough assessment of iron metabolism seems worthwhile, including with a view to functional deficiency. This goes beyond the guideline and is not established evidence.

Both lead to the same point: iron should not be taken on your own initiative, because iron overload is also possible. More in Functional iron deficiency despite normal ferritin, Iron deficiency and fatigue and Iron overload.

Thyroid

According to DEGAM, TSH belongs in the basic laboratory tests, but not every slightly altered value explains exhaustion. In the TRUST trial, 737 people aged 65 and over with subclinical hypothyroidism received levothyroxine or placebo, and after one year the groups differed neither in the hypothyroid symptom score nor in the tiredness score (Stott 2017). This cannot simply be transferred to younger people. DEGAM, too, describes the treatment threshold and benefit here as unclear [Guideline].

If you already take thyroid hormones, this paragraph changes nothing about that. Any adjustment belongs in the hands of the doctor who prescribed them. More in Thyroid: normal values, yet symptoms.

Vitamin D

A team led by Nowak gave 120 healthy people with fatigue and a 25-OH vitamin D level below 20 µg/L a single dose of vitamin D, according to the study 100,000 units, or placebo. After four weeks, 72 percent of the vitamin D group and 50 percent of the placebo group reported an improvement in fatigue (Nowak 2016), in a small study with an erratum. DEGAM counters that a vitamin D deficit does not correlate with increased fatigue, and warns against spurious associations created by targeted testing [Guideline].

The dose is a study figure and not a recommendation. High-dose vitamin D without monitoring can lead to hypercalcaemia, a dangerously raised calcium level. More in Vitamin D deficiency and Vitamin D overdose.

Sleep apnoea

Sleep apnoea can lead to marked daytime sleepiness that can feel like never-ending exhaustion. DEGAM names as key indications daytime sleepiness with falling asleep at the wheel, observed pauses in breathing and loud snoring, together with body weight. The diagnosis is made with diagnostic equipment, and symptomatic sleep apnoea is regarded there as an avoidable dangerous course because of the risk of accidents [Guideline]. If you nod off at the wheel, this should be assessed promptly, see Recognising sleep apnoea.

Depression

The most important question in this section is not a laboratory question. According to the DEGAM guideline, 60 percent of people with fatigue who answered yes to at least one of two screening questions on depression had a confirmed depression [Guideline]. How burnout and depression are related is disputed: a systematic review led by Bianchi of 92 studies considers the distinction conceptually fragile (Bianchi 2015), while a meta-analysis led by Koutsimani found a clear association, r = 0.52, but considered the two distinguishable (Koutsimani 2019).

In practical terms: if low mood, loss of joy or hopelessness are in the foreground, if you cannot bring yourself to do anything for weeks, or if thoughts of death arise, this should be assessed by a doctor or psychotherapist. Depression is a serious, treatable illness and not a matter of willpower. A functional look at iron, thyroid or sleep comes as a complement, never in place of treatment for depression. If you have suicidal thoughts: Telefonseelsorge 0800 111 0 111 or 0800 111 0 222, and 112 in acute danger. These are German numbers. Outside Germany, please use your local crisis line and emergency number. More in Burnout or depression, Sleep and depression and Physical symptoms of burnout.

Reframe

Finding a physical cause does not mean your burnout was not real. And not finding one does not mean you are imagining the exhaustion. Both can be present at the same time: an overload that exhausted you, and a brake in the body that can slow recovery.

And now you know why exhaustion that does not fit the course deserves a thorough assessment and not a test of patience.

To take with you Four lenses on your recovery
Stress axis and nervous system
Mechanistically plausible, human studies thin

After long, continuous activation, the system may need time to switch over. In one follow-up study, a cortisol profile was not suitable as a measure of progress.

Sleep and rhythm
Indications from small follow-up studies

More consolidated sleep went along with recovery. For light and rhythm in burnout, there are only neighbouring fields.

Metabolism and micronutrients
Indications with clear deficiency, disputed in the grey zone

Iron, vitamin D and thyroid have studies on both sides, burnout-specific ones are lacking. In clinical practice I observe that an assessment is often worthwhile.

Relationships, work and meaning
Supported by cohorts, registers and interviews

Resources, control, dialogue with the workplace and support went along with recovery or return, ongoing responsibility for others with long-lasting exhaustion.

Three directions for the coming weeks, as food for thought and not as a plan

  • Adjust your expectations to waves. Compare weeks with weeks, not days with days.
  • Consciously focus on one recovery experience, such as detachment or mastery, without a compulsory programme.
  • Have open questions clarified by a doctor, physical as well as mental, especially if the exhaustion does not fit the course.

Recovery after burnout is rarely a straight line. But it often has a direction. And it is about more than returning to a desk. It is about having the strength again for what makes up your life. Energy is not a luxury. Energy is freedom.

Frequently asked questions about recovery after burnout

How long does recovery after burnout take?

There is no reliable single number, because courses vary a great deal. The best long-term data come from a Swedish clinical cohort with severe stress-related exhaustion. There, after 18 months of treatment, one third still had symptoms of clinical burnout, while depressive symptoms and anxiety mostly declined within the first three months. After seven years, 16 percent felt fully recovered, 59 percent much better and 21 percent better. These figures tend to reflect severe courses and are not a prognosis for you.

Why do I sometimes feel worse on sick leave than before?

Many people describe this. The phenomenon has not been studied directly in burnout. From neighbouring fields there are small findings: a Dutch pilot study on leisure sickness with headache, fatigue, muscle pain and nausea when work pauses, and a small migraine study in which a drop in stress was associated with more attacks in the following hours. It is mechanistically plausible that a system that has been activated for a long time might need time to switch over. Waves are common. If red flags such as suicidal thoughts, marked loss of drive lasting weeks or physical warning signs appear, this should be assessed by a doctor promptly.

How high is the risk of relapse after burnout?

I have not found a study source for the widely quoted figure of 50 to 60 percent. What is documented are Dutch register data: of 9,904 employees on sick leave for the first time because of a common mental disorder, 19 percent went on sick leave again over seven years, and 90 percent of these recurrences occurred within three years. What was counted was sick leave, not burnout specifically. The authors recommend thinking about relapse prevention over three years. In another study, conflict with a supervisor was a risk factor for renewed sickness absence.

Why are concentration and memory still poor even though the fatigue is easing?

Many people experience this, and studies show that cognitive impairments can remain measurable for a long time. In a Swedish study, people with stress-related exhaustion still performed worse than healthy people on speed, attention and memory three years later. In a Danish cohort, the greatest improvement came in the first year, and after four years a small, significant difference was measurable only for immediate memory. Another study found measured improvements that did not match the self-rated change. If symptoms are very pronounced, it is also worth looking at physical causes such as iron deficiency.

Can you become fully well again after burnout?

Yes, that is possible, and in follow-up studies many people became considerably better. In the Swedish seven-year study, 16 percent felt fully recovered, 59 percent much better and 21 percent better. Some had residual symptoms, most often reduced stress tolerance, reported by 73 percent. This is a group finding from a clinic with rather severe courses and not a prediction for you. Your own path depends on many factors, including what changes in your circumstances.

How can I tell that I am recovering?

Rarely from a single day, more often by comparing weeks or months. In a sleep laboratory study, recovery went along with more consolidated sleep, and easing fatigue was the best predictor of returning to work. In a small interview study, regained joy tended to come towards the end of the process. In clinical practice I also observe that setbacks often become shorter over time. The capacity to handle demands often returns later than energy.

What is the regeneration phase in burnout?

The regeneration phase is not a technical term with a fixed definition. It usually means the time after acute relief, in which strength, sleep, concentration and the capacity to handle demands can gradually return. It rarely follows a straight line, and cognitive symptoms can persist for years. It is less about rest alone than about gradual rebuilding, usually accompanied by medical or psychotherapeutic treatment: practising detachment, stabilising sleep, increasing activity in agreed steps, maintaining contacts and preparing the return to work. The well-known phase models are discussed in the article on burnout phases.

Should I exercise during the regeneration phase?

Exercise can be worthwhile, but the evidence is nuanced. A meta-analysis found no clear effect of exercise therapy on burnout scores. In a Swedish randomised trial, moderate to high intensity aerobic training improved fitness and episodic memory, but only 51 percent of the training group completed it, compared with 78 percent of the control group. Too much too soon can be overwhelming. A more cautious approach is a dose guided by how you feel the following day. If symptoms regularly worsen after exertion with a delay and for days, ME/CFS should be assessed by a doctor. The type and amount of exercise should be agreed with a doctor or physiotherapist.

What does psychological detachment mean, and can it be learned?

Psychological detachment means not being at work in your thoughts during your free time either. It is one of four recovery experiences described by Sabine Sonnentag and Charlotte Fritz, alongside relaxation, mastery and control. In a meta-analysis, better detachment was associated with less exhaustion and better sleep. And it can be practised: another meta-analysis of 30 studies found an average improvement of d = 0.36, stronger with longer programmes and in people whose health was already impaired.

Can a holiday replace recovery after burnout?

Usually not. A meta-analysis of seven studies with healthy employees found small positive effects of vacations that faded quickly after the return to work. In clinical burnout, a break without changed conditions is therefore probably often not enough, even though this has not been studied directly for burnout. Recovery then needs more time, a look at the conditions that contributed to the exhaustion, and often professional support. A holiday can still do you good, as one building block among several.

When is the right time to return to work?

There is no fixed point in time. It should be weighed up together with the people who support you medically and therapeutically. A team that analysed Dutch register data describes the return to work with mental health diagnoses as often being a step-by-step process with increasing hours. The British NICE guideline names adjustments such as a phased return, reduced hours or modified duties, recorded in a written return-to-work plan that is reviewed regularly. In one study, conflict with a supervisor was a risk factor for renewed sickness absence, and it deserves to be addressed beforehand. Legal questions about the Hamburg model, the German form of graded reintegration, are covered in the article on sick leave and return to work.

Which blood values should be checked for persistent exhaustion?

For primarily unexplained fatigue, the German DEGAM guideline on fatigue recommends basic laboratory tests with blood glucose, full blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate or CRP, transaminases or gamma-GT, and TSH. In women of childbearing age, ferritin can also be measured. Further tests should depend on abnormal findings or specific indications. Burnout itself is not covered by this guideline. Reference ranges depend on the laboratory and the measurement method, so interpretation belongs in a conversation with a doctor, and no self-treatment should follow from a single value.

Could depression be behind the exhaustion?

Yes, that is possible. The German National Disease Management Guideline (NVL) Unipolar Depression states that burnout symptoms can be a sign of an underlying depression and should be taken seriously. According to the DEGAM guideline, 60 percent of people with fatigue who answered at least one of two screening questions positively had a confirmed depression. If low mood, loss of joy or hopelessness persist for weeks, this should be assessed by a doctor or psychotherapist. If you have suicidal thoughts, please get help immediately: Telefonseelsorge 0800 111 0 111 or 0800 111 0 222, around the clock and free of charge, and 112 in acute danger. These are German numbers. Outside Germany, please use your local crisis line and emergency number.

What is different about recovering from boreout?

With boreout, meaning chronic underload, people also feel exhausted and empty, but for a different reason. Recovery from overload starts with relief and gradual rebuilding. With boreout, it is less about more rest and more about meaning and stimulation. In my view, what falls short there above all is mastery, the experience of competence when facing new challenges. More on this in the article on boreout and chronic underload.

Where the path leads from here

Recovery touches on sleep, work, mood, iron status and exercise. That is why here are ten paths that lead on from this article.

SJ

Shukri Jarmoukli

Physician, Integrative Medicine · ViveCura Berlin

In my private practice I work at the interface of conventional medicine, functional medicine and Clinical Psychoneuroimmunology. With exhaustion, I am interested in which conditions keep it going, which physical brakes have never been looked at, and which treatment fits which phase.

With this topic, it is important to me not to promise timelines. The data show long, wave-like courses, and at the same time they show that many people become considerably better. Psychotherapy and psychiatric treatment are central building blocks here, and the functional assessment comes as a complement, never in their place. This article does not replace medical or psychotherapeutic advice and is explicitly not a guide to changing an existing treatment or medication.

ViveCura, private practice Shukri Jarmoukli, Skalitzer Straße 137, 10999 Berlin

Scientific sources

45 studies, 44 of them with DOI and all with PMID, plus three guidelines and the WHO classification. Citations follow the PubMed standard citation.

Course, duration and relapse

  1. Glise K, Ahlborg G Jr, Jonsdottir IH. Course of mental symptoms in patients with stress-related exhaustion: does sex or age make a difference? BMC Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;12:18. PMID: 22409935 · DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-18 [Cohort, clinical, n=232]
  2. Glise K, Wiegner L, Jonsdottir IH. Long-term follow-up of residual symptoms in patients treated for stress-related exhaustion. BMC Psychol. 2020 Mar;8(1):26. PMID: 32188513 · DOI: 10.1186/s40359-020-0395-8 [Cohort, 7-year follow-up, n=217]
  3. Leone SS, Huibers MJ, Knottnerus JA, Kant I. A comparison of the course of burnout and prolonged fatigue: a 4-year prospective cohort study. J Psychosom Res. 2008 Jul;65(1):31-8. PMID: 18582609 · DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.03.018 [Cohort, working population, 4 years]
  4. Hätinen M, Kinnunen U, Mäkikangas A, Kalimo R, Tolvanen A, Pekkonen M. Burnout during a long-term rehabilitation: comparing low burnout, high burnout - benefited, and high burnout - not benefited trajectories. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2009 May;22(3):341-60. PMID: 19283645 · DOI: 10.1080/10615800802567023 [Cohort, trajectory groups, n=85]
  5. Eklöf B, Larsson H, Ellbin S, Jonsdottir IH, O'Dwyer S, Hansson C. The role of self-reported stressors in recovery from Exhaustion Disorder: a longitudinal study. BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Aug;22(1):529. PMID: 35931962 · DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-04172-y [Cohort, mixed methods, n=150]
  6. Koopmans PC, Bültmann U, Roelen CA, Hoedeman R, van der Klink JJ, Groothoff JW. Recurrence of sickness absence due to common mental disorders. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011 Feb;84(2):193-201. PMID: 20449605 · DOI: 10.1007/s00420-010-0540-4 [Cohort, register, n=9,904, 7 years]
  7. Arends I, van der Klink JJ, van Rhenen W, de Boer MR, Bültmann U. Predictors of recurrent sickness absence among workers having returned to work after sickness absence due to common mental disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014 Mar;40(2):195-202. PMID: 24048675 · DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3384 [Cohort, prospective within a cluster RCT, n=158]

Why recovery comes in waves

  1. de Bloom J, Kompier M, Geurts S, de Weerth C, Taris T, Sonnentag S. Do we recover from vacation? Meta-analysis of vacation effects on health and well-being. J Occup Health. 2009;51(1):13-25. PMID: 19096200 · DOI: 10.1539/joh.k8004 [Meta-analysis, k=7, healthy employees]
  2. Vingerhoets AJ, Van Huijgevoort M, Van Heck GL. Leisure sickness: a pilot study on its prevalence, phenomenology, and background. Psychother Psychosom. 2002;71(6):311-7. PMID: 12411765 · DOI: 10.1159/000065992 [Cross-sectional and case-control, pilot study]
  3. Lipton RB, Buse DC, Hall CB, Tennen H, Defreitas TA, Borkowski TM, Grosberg BM, Haut SR. Reduction in perceived stress as a migraine trigger: testing the "let-down headache" hypothesis. Neurology. 2014 Apr;82(16):1395-401. PMID: 24670889 · DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000332 [Cohort, prospective diary study, n=17]

Concentration, memory and capacity to handle demands

  1. Jonsdottir IH, Nordlund A, Ellbin S, Ljung T, Glise K, Währborg P, Sjörs A, Wallin A. Working memory and attention are still impaired after three years in patients with stress-related exhaustion. Scand J Psychol. 2017 Dec;58(6):504-509. PMID: 29023756 · DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12394 [Cohort with control group, n=30 vs 27]
  2. Eskildsen A, Andersen LP, Pedersen AD, Andersen JH. Cognitive impairments in former patients with work-related stress complaints - one year later. Stress. 2016 Nov;19(6):559-566. PMID: 27578321 · DOI: 10.1080/10253890.2016.1222370 [Cohort with matched controls]
  3. Dalgaard VL, Hviid Andersen J, Pedersen AD, Andersen LP, Eskildsen A. Cognitive impairments and recovery in patients with work-related stress complaints - four years later. Stress. 2021 May;24(3):294-302. PMID: 32812459 · DOI: 10.1080/10253890.2020.1797673 [Cohort with matched controls, 4 years]
  4. Ellbin S, Jonsdottir IH, Eckerström C, Eckerström M. Self-reported cognitive impairment and daily life functioning 7-12 years after seeking care for stress-related exhaustion. Scand J Psychol. 2021 Aug;62(4):484-492. PMID: 33728711 · DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12722 [Cohort, cross-sectional comparison, n=51/98/50]
  5. Österberg K, Karlson B, Malmberg B, Hansen ÅM. A follow-up of cognitive performance and diurnal salivary cortisol changes in former burnout patients. Stress. 2012 Nov;15(6):589-600. PMID: 22168599 · DOI: 10.3109/10253890.2011.648972 [Cohort, n=45, 1.5 years]
  6. Beck J, Gerber M, Brand S, Pühse U, Holsboer-Trachsler E. Executive function performance is reduced during occupational burnout but can recover to the level of healthy controls. J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Nov;47(11):1824-30. PMID: 24018104 · DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.08.009 [Cohort, small, n=12 vs 12]
  7. Malmberg Gavelin H, Eskilsson T, Boraxbekk CJ, Josefsson M, Stigsdotter Neely A, Slunga Järvholm L. Rehabilitation for improved cognition in patients with stress-related exhaustion disorder: RECO - a randomized clinical trial. Stress. 2018 Jul;21(4):279-291. PMID: 29693483 · DOI: 10.1080/10253890.2018.1461833 [RCT, open-label, n=132]
  8. Aronsson I, Neely AS, Boraxbekk CJ, Eskilsson T, Gavelin HM. Extended Long-Term Effects of Cognitive and Aerobic Training on Cognitive Function in Patients With Stress-Related Exhaustion Disorder: A 4.5-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Stress Health. 2026 Oct;42(5):e70218. PMID: 42698289 · DOI: 10.1002/smi.70218 [RCT follow-up, 56 of 132 participants]

Recovery experiences and detachment

  1. Sonnentag S, Fritz C. The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. J Occup Health Psychol. 2007 Jul;12(3):204-21. PMID: 17638488 · DOI: 10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204 [Validation study, N=930]
  2. Wendsche J, Lohmann-Haislah A. A Meta-Analysis on Antecedents and Outcomes of Detachment from Work. Front Psychol. 2016;7:2072. PMID: 28133454 · DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02072 [Meta-analysis, 91 samples, N=38,124, correlational]
  3. Karabinski T, Haun VC, Nübold A, Wendsche J, Wegge J. Interventions for improving psychological detachment from work: A meta-analysis. J Occup Health Psychol. 2021 Jun;26(3):224-242. PMID: 34096763 · DOI: 10.1037/ocp0000280 [Meta-analysis, k=30, N=3,725]
  4. Hahn VC, Binnewies C, Sonnentag S, Mojza EJ. Learning how to recover from job stress: effects of a recovery training program on recovery, recovery-related self-efficacy, and well-being. J Occup Health Psychol. 2011 Apr;16(2):202-16. PMID: 21463049 · DOI: 10.1037/a0022169 [Quasi-experimental study with waiting-list group, N=95]

Sleep, exercise, people, nature, mindfulness

  1. Ekstedt M, Söderström M, Akerstedt T. Sleep physiology in recovery from burnout. Biol Psychol. 2009 Dec;82(3):267-73. PMID: 19699775 · DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.08.006 [Cohort with polysomnography, n=23 vs 16]
  2. Ochentel O, Humphrey C, Pfeifer K. Efficacy of Exercise Therapy in Persons with Burnout. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Sports Sci Med. 2018 Sep;17(3):475-484. PMID: 30116121 · PMCID: PMC6090391 · no DOI [Meta-analysis, 4 RCTs in the meta-analysis, n=248]
  3. Eskilsson T, Slunga Järvholm L, Malmberg Gavelin H, Stigsdotter Neely A, Boraxbekk CJ. Aerobic training for improved memory in patients with stress-related exhaustion: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;17(1):322. PMID: 28865430 · DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1457-1 [RCT, open-label, n=88]
  4. Halbesleben JR. Sources of social support and burnout: a meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model. J Appl Psychol. 2006 Sep;91(5):1134-45. PMID: 16953774 · DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1134 [Meta-analysis, correlational]
  5. Salminen S, Mäkikangas A, Hätinen M, Kinnunen U, Pekkonen M. My Well-Being in My Own Hands: Experiences of Beneficial Recovery During Burnout Rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Dec;25(4):733-41. PMID: 25963325 · DOI: 10.1007/s10926-015-9581-6 [Qualitative interview study, n=12]
  6. Stigsdotter UK, Corazon SS, Sidenius U, Nyed PK, Larsen HB, Fjorback LO. Efficacy of nature-based therapy for individuals with stress-related illnesses: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;213(1):404-411. PMID: 29793558 · DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2018.2 [RCT, active control, n=84]
  7. Twohig-Bennett C, Jones A. The health benefits of the great outdoors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes. Environ Res. 2018 Oct;166:628-637. PMID: 29982151 · DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.030 [Meta-analysis, 103 observational and 40 interventional studies]
  8. Grensman A, Acharya BD, Wändell P, Nilsson GH, Falkenberg T, Sundin Ö, Werner S. Effect of traditional yoga, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, and cognitive behavioral therapy, on health related quality of life: a randomized controlled trial on patients on sick leave because of burnout. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018 Mar;18(1):80. PMID: 29510704 · DOI: 10.1186/s12906-018-2141-9 [RCT, three active arms, n=94 randomised]
  9. Tamminga SJ, Emal LM, Boschman JS, Levasseur A, Thota A, Ruotsalainen JH, Schelvis RM, Nieuwenhuijsen K, van der Molen HF. Individual-level interventions for reducing occupational stress in healthcare workers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May;5(5):CD002892. PMID: 37169364 · DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002892.pub6 [Meta-analysis, Cochrane, 117 RCTs, 11,119 participants]

Psychotherapy and work-related support

  1. Arends I, Bruinvels DJ, Rebergen DS, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Madan I, Neumeyer-Gromen A, Bültmann U, Verbeek JH. Interventions to facilitate return to work in adults with adjustment disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec;12(12):CD006389. PMID: 23235630 · DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006389.pub2 [Meta-analysis, Cochrane, k=9, 1,546 participants]
  2. Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek JH, Neumeyer-Gromen A, Verhoeven AC, Bültmann U, Faber B. Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct;10(10):CD006237. PMID: 33052607 · DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006237.pub4 [Meta-analysis, Cochrane, k=45, 12,109 participants]
  3. Perski O, Grossi G, Perski A, Niemi M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of tertiary interventions in clinical burnout. Scand J Psychol. 2017 Dec;58(6):551-561. PMID: 29105127 · DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12398 [Meta-analysis, k=8, clinical burnout]
  4. Stenlund T, Nordin M, Järvholm LS. Effects of rehabilitation programmes for patients on long-term sick leave for burnout: a 3-year follow-up of the REST study. J Rehabil Med. 2012 Jul;44(8):684-90. PMID: 22729797 · DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1003 [RCT follow-up, 3 years, n=107 per protocol]
  5. Lindegård A, Glise K, Wiegner L, Reinhardt P, Ellbin S, Pettersson S, Hadzibajramovic E, Jonsdottir I. Effects of Additional Individually Tailored Interventions on Sick-Leave and Symptoms in Patients with Exhaustion Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Rehabil Med. 2022 Aug;54:jrm00321. PMID: 35801865 · DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v54.2941 [RCT, n=142, 15 months]

Return to work

  1. Karlson B, Jönsson P, Pålsson B, Abjörnsson G, Malmberg B, Larsson B, Osterberg K. Return to work after a workplace-oriented intervention for patients on sick-leave for burnout, a prospective controlled study. BMC Public Health. 2010 Jun;10:301. PMID: 20515510 · DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-301 [Cohort, controlled, not randomised, n=74 vs 74]
  2. Karlson B, Jönsson P, Österberg K. Long-term stability of return to work after a workplace-oriented intervention for patients on sick leave for burnout. BMC Public Health. 2014 Aug;14:821. PMID: 25106094 · DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-821 [Cohort, controlled follow-up, 68 matched pairs]
  3. Kärkkäinen R, Saaranen T, Hiltunen S, Ryynänen OP, Räsänen K. Systematic review: Factors associated with return to work in burnout. Occup Med (Lond). 2017 Aug;67(6):461-468. PMID: 28898968 · DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqx093 [Systematic Review, k=10]
  4. Vendelbosch R, Roelen C, Almansa J, Bültmann U, Arends I. Do return-to-work trajectories differ by mental disorder diagnosis? A register study among 37 523 Dutch workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024 Oct;50(7):527-535. PMID: 39344707 · DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4183 [Cohort, register, n=37,523, of which burnout n=3,644]

Physical factors and depression

  1. Vaucher P, Druais PL, Waldvogel S, Favrat B. Effect of iron supplementation on fatigue in nonanemic menstruating women with low ferritin: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2012 Aug;184(11):1247-54. PMID: 22777991 · DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.110950 [RCT, placebo-controlled, n=198]
  2. Stott DJ, Rodondi N, Kearney PM, Ford I, Westendorp RGJ, Mooijaart SP, Sattar N, et al. Thyroid Hormone Therapy for Older Adults with Subclinical Hypothyroidism. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun;376(26):2534-2544. PMID: 28402245 · DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603825 [RCT, double-blind, n=737]
  3. Nowak A, Boesch L, Andres E, Battegay E, Hornemann T, Schmid C, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Suter PM, Krayenbuehl PA. Effect of vitamin D3 on self-perceived fatigue: A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(52):e5353. PMID: 28033244 · DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005353 · Erratum PMID: 31305701 [RCT, double-blind, n=120]
  4. Bianchi R, Schonfeld IS, Laurent E. Burnout-depression overlap: a review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Mar;36:28-41. PMID: 25638755 · DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.004 [Systematic Review, k=92]
  5. Koutsimani P, Montgomery A, Georganta K. The Relationship Between Burnout, Depression, and Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Psychol. 2019;10:284. PMID: 30918490 · DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00284 [Meta-analysis]

Guidelines and classification

  1. German College of General Practitioners and Family Physicians (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemeinmedizin und Familienmedizin, DEGAM). S3-Leitlinie Müdigkeit (S3 guideline on fatigue). AWMF register no. 053-002, status December 2022, published 01/2023. register.awmf.org [Guideline]
  2. German Medical Association (Bundesärztekammer), National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung), Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften). Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Unipolare Depression (German National Disease Management Guideline Unipolar Depression), long version, version 3.2. 2022. AWMF register no. nvl-005. leitlinien.de [Guideline]
  3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Workplace health: long-term sickness absence and capability to work. NICE guideline NG146, 20 November 2019. nice.org.uk [Guideline]
  4. World Health Organization. Burn-out an "occupational phenomenon": International Classification of Diseases. Press release of 28 May 2019. who.int [Classification, ICD-11 QD85]
Transparency on the evidence: what is established, what is open, what is observation
  1. The figures on duration come mainly from a Swedish clinical cohort with severe stress-related exhaustion. They tend to reflect severe courses. The Dutch data on recovery and chronic course come from the working population and are based on questionnaires. The two data sets measure different things and are not directly comparable.
  2. For the residual symptoms after seven years, the results text of the study gives 43 percent for memory problems, the table 42 percent. This article uses the table value.
  3. That things first get worse when the pressure drops has not been studied directly for burnout. The findings drawn on are a pilot study on leisure sickness without a burnout sample and a migraine study with 17 people included in the analysis. The model in the mechanism box is derived and not tested.
  4. The relapse figure of 50 to 60 percent could not be traced to any study. The register study cited counts renewed sick leave due to common mental disorders, not symptoms and not burnout specifically.
  5. That too much exercise too soon is harmful has not been shown for burnout in randomised trials. What is documented is the low completion rate of an intensive programme and an unclear effect on burnout scores. ME/CFS has its own body of evidence, which is not presented here.
  6. On daylight and rhythm in burnout, no studies of their own were found. The light therapy recommendation comes from the guideline on unipolar depression.
  7. The nature data are based on one randomised trial with 84 participants without an untreated control group and a meta-analysis from the general population with study quality that was weak in part.
  8. Several reviews come from neighbouring fields: adjustment disorders, depression, and stress in healthcare professions, mostly in prevention. They are labelled as such and not presented as evidence for burnout. The finding on time to return under cognitive behavioural therapy concerns only this endpoint and says nothing about the value of psychotherapy.
  9. The workplace-oriented intervention by Karlson and colleagues was not randomised. The comparison group consisted of people who had declined to take part. PubMed lists the 2014 follow-up as a randomised trial, but according to the original paper the allocation was not random.
  10. The 4.5-year follow-up on cognitive training reached 56 of 132 participants. The authors themselves warn of bias from selective dropout.
  11. There are no burnout-specific randomised trials on iron, vitamin D and thyroid. The iron study included only menstruating women, the vitamin D study is small and has an erratum, and the thyroid study applies only to people aged 65 and over. The doses mentioned are study figures.
  12. Statements labelled as clinical observation on setbacks after good days, on setbacks becoming shorter and on ferritin are observations from my consultations and not study results.
  13. What is deliberately not included here. No recommendation for dietary supplements, no dosage recommendation, no training volumes, no recovery plan to copy, no prognosis on duration and no legal advice. No advice to stop, reduce or replace an antidepressant, a sleeping pill, thyroid hormones or any other prescribed medication. Any change belongs in the hands of the doctor who prescribed it. Nothing in any paragraph of this article implies that psychotherapy or psychiatric treatment should be postponed, shortened or replaced by nature, exercise or relaxation methods.

Have questions or want to book an appointment?

We'd be happy to advise you personally at our practice.

Book appointment